Elon Musk: I Am Willing To Serve!

[Reagan]

 

Thoughts?!

[5GallonBucket]

Better than Harris, but that isn’t saying much

[HuntersLaptop2028]

Trump supporters are convinced the billionaire supporting another billionaire, have people like Reagan’s best interests in mind

Freaking LOL man 

[LumRaiderFan]

8 minutes ago, HuntersLaptop2028 said:

Trump supporters are convinced the billionaire supporting another billionaire, have people like Reagan’s best interests in mind

Freaking LOL man 

Democrats like yourself are convinced that politicians have their best interest in mind.

🤣

[HuntersLaptop2028]

3 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Democrats like yourself are convinced that politicians have their best interest in mind.

🤣

Trump supporter logic - anyone that doesn’t support trump, is a democrat

People like you are the reason your party is a cluster right now. Give yourself two pats on the back, champ

[LumRaiderFan]

10 minutes ago, HuntersLaptop2028 said:

Trump supporter logic - anyone that doesn’t support trump, is a democrat

People like you are the reason your party is a cluster right now. Give yourself two pats on the back, champ

No, people like you are why we are a cluster right now, you voted for biden rather than the best choice for the country.

Don't try to deny it, your posts tell us all we need to know.

Quit being the victim and worrying about who has your best interests in mind, no one in Washington does.

[HuntersLaptop2028]

9 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

No, people like you are why we are a cluster right now, you voted for biden rather than the best choice for the country.

Don't try to deny it, your posts tell us all we need to know.

Quit being the victim and worrying about who has your best interests in mind, no one in Washington does.

Lol talk about lessons unlearned, good chat 

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, HuntersLaptop2028 said:

Trump supporters are convinced the billionaire supporting another billionaire, have people like Reagan’s best interests in mind

Freaking LOL man 

Who would you think would be more inclined to be able to streamline government:  a career politician or a business individual who's lively hood is dependent on succeeding?  If you owned a business, would you trust Nancy Pelosi or Chucky Schumer to run your business?  Or would you trust Trump or Musk?  Government is nothing more than big business.  They are just not bound by balance sheets!  

[thetragichippy]

Musk briefly attended the 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 before immigrating to Canada at the age of 18, acquiring citizenship through his Canadian-born mother. Two years later he 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 at 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 in Canada. Musk later transferred to the 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 and received 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 in economics and physics. He moved to California in 1995 to attend 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, but dropped out after two days and, with his brother 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, co-founded the online 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 software company 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. The startup was acquired by 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 for $307 million in 1999. That same year Musk co-founded 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. X.com merged with 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 in 2000 to form 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. In October 2002 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 acquired PayPal for $1.5 billion. Using $100 million of the money he made from the sale of PayPal, Musk founded SpaceX, a 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 services company, in 2002.

 

Why in the world would we want a guy that created profitable companies and became the richest man in the world to have any input on Government programs? (sarcasm)

The guy has great ideas and is running X(twitter) better than ever with a 1/3rd of the staff.  

I'm not sure why so many people hate successful people.  

[LumRaiderFan]

19 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Musk briefly attended the 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 before immigrating to Canada at the age of 18, acquiring citizenship through his Canadian-born mother. Two years later he 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 at 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 in Canada. Musk later transferred to the 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 and received 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 in economics and physics. He moved to California in 1995 to attend 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, but dropped out after two days and, with his brother 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, co-founded the online 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 software company 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. The startup was acquired by 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 for $307 million in 1999. That same year Musk co-founded 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. X.com merged with 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 in 2000 to form 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. In October 2002 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 acquired PayPal for $1.5 billion. Using $100 million of the money he made from the sale of PayPal, Musk founded SpaceX, a 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 services company, in 2002.

 

Why in the world would we want a guy that created profitable companies and became the richest man in the world to have any input on Government programs? (sarcasm)

The guy has great ideas and is running X(twitter) better than ever with a 1/3rd of the staff.  

I'm not sure why so many people hate successful people.  

Jealousy, I guess, never really understood that either.

 

[HuntersLaptop2028]

Now the trump supporters are saying I hate successful people, even though I said I hope GOP nominates Glenn youngkin in 2028

Zero critical thinking 🧠 

[UT alum]

5 hours ago, Reagan said:

Who would you think would be more inclined to be able to streamline government:  a career politician or a business individual who's lively hood is dependent on succeeding?  If you owned a business, would you trust Nancy Pelosi or Chucky Schumer to run your business?  Or would you trust Trump or Musk?  Government is nothing more than big business.  They are just not bound by balance sheets!  

Wrong. Government is not like big business. That’s one reason business people do not do particularly well in the Oval Office. If a cost - benefit analysis shows the cost of lead poisoning is less than the cost of replacing lead pipes, you’d be drinking lead. That’s why we got business regulation. Unrestrained capitalism does not have a moral framework. Not a judgement, just an economic reality.

[mat]

12 hours ago, UT alum said:

Wrong. Government is not like big business. That’s one reason business people do not do particularly well in the Oval Office. If a cost - benefit analysis shows the cost of lead poisoning is less than the cost of replacing lead pipes, you’d be drinking lead. That’s why we got business regulation. Unrestrained capitalism does not have a moral framework. Not a judgement, just an economic reality.

Somewhat right, somewhat wrong. You think government regulation is in place to protect the public? Government is like a big mafia. They rule control and oppress what does not benefit their machine.

[UT alum]

14 minutes ago, mat said:

Somewhat right, somewhat wrong. You think government regulation is in place to protect the public? Government is like a big mafia. They rule control and oppress what does not benefit their machine.

That’s a bit cynical, Mat. The government is subject to the same Constitution as all of us. I think you’re confusing the role of government with the ability of lobbyists and unlimited donor money to influence that role. That’s the mafia side. I recognize that bureaucratic creep is real and is a hazard, but the government doesn’t seek to control. The money does. I’ve long believed that every other session of Congress the only action towards bills would be bills to eliminate unneeded or detrimental laws already in existence. Or, in every session the only way to introduce a new law is to take an old one off the books. Government exists, and has as long as there has been one, to give order to a society.

[baddog]

How does defunding the police and allowing criminals/terrorist to cross our border bring order to society?

[mat]

9 hours ago, UT alum said:

That’s a bit cynical, Mat. The government is subject to the same Constitution as all of us. I think you’re confusing the role of government with the ability of lobbyists and unlimited donor money to influence that role. That’s the mafia side. I recognize that bureaucratic creep is real and is a hazard, but the government doesn’t seek to control. The money does. I’ve long believed that every other session of Congress the only action towards bills would be bills to eliminate unneeded or detrimental laws already in existence. Or, in every session the only way to introduce a new law is to take an old one off the books. Government exists, and has as long as there has been one, to give order to a society.

Tomayto tomahto. That’s like blaming the cartel for our drug problem when we allow it into our country.

[Reagan]

11 hours ago, UT alum said:

That’s a bit cynical, Mat. The government is subject to the same Constitution as all of us. I think you’re confusing the role of government with the ability of lobbyists and unlimited donor money to influence that role. That’s the mafia side. I recognize that bureaucratic creep is real and is a hazard, but the government doesn’t seek to control. The money does. I’ve long believed that every other session of Congress the only action towards bills would be bills to eliminate unneeded or detrimental laws already in existence. Or, in every session the only way to introduce a new law is to take an old one off the books. Government exists, and has as long as there has been one, to give order to a society.

Really?!  Just like when the Supreme Court it was unconstitutional when JoeBama was unilaterally forgiving student debt?  He had no constitutional right to to it.  But did it anyway.  Broke his oath!  So, you have to have an honest government to make your statement true.