Jump to content

LCM VS HF week 1


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said:

HF by a few. Lol 

Thats bad when two alums pick against your alma mater. I guess at some point you have to honest with yourself. But if LCM wins that will tell me they are a good team to be respected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

Thats bad when two alums pick against your alma mater. I guess at some point you have to honest with yourself. But if LCM wins that will tell me they are a good team to be respected. 

I respect them either way. They picked extremely tough challenges pre district nd not cupcakes, and that's something to build off of.

 

Realistically. HF is a tall task at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, setxathlete14 said:

I respect them either way. They picked extremely tough challenges pre district nd not cupcakes, and that's something to build off of.

 

Realistically. HF is a tall task at this point.

Respect has to be earned not given!!!! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HF is really good this year.  I was kinda curious to see how they'd scrimmage against lumberton last week.  the fact that they were up 21-0 and lumberton took their ball and went home after 1 quarter told me a lot.  If you'd asked me for a full game prediction, I would've picked HF over lumberton by 21.  The horns looked like they could hang 60 on them.  If LCM hasn't improved a lot from last year, HF could win in a blowout.  The horns are better this year than last, and they were pretty dang good last year when they beat a couple of teams who pounded on the bears pretty good. I'll take HF by 21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

HF is really good this year.  I was kinda curious to see how they'd scrimmage against lumberton last week.  the fact that they were up 21-0 and lumberton took their ball and went home after 1 quarter told me a lot.  If you'd asked me for a full game prediction, I would've picked HF over lumberton by 21.  The horns looked like they could hang 60 on them.  If LCM hasn't improved a lot from last year, HF could win in a blowout.  The horns are better this year than last, and they were pretty dang good last year when they beat a couple of teams who pounded on the bears pretty good. I'll take HF by 21.

I agree to a point. Not so sure HF is better defensively this year. Lost a lot on that side of the ball. All three LB's, 2 DB's and a DL. All were very significant on that side of the ball. Particularly two of the LB's.

HF offense will be their strength. Lot's of weapons and a good offensive line. 

Still my pick to win district.

As for this game, I got HF by 14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I agree to a point. Not so sure HF is better defensively this year. Lost a lot on that side of the ball. All three LB's, 2 DB's and a DL. All were very significant on that side of the ball. Particularly two of the LB's.

HF offense will be their strength. Lot's of weapons and a good offensive line. 

Still my pick to win district.

As for this game, I got HF by 14

defense should still be pretty salty, but you're right, they lost some key guys.  it's my understanding there are some solid pieces moving up as well, though.  Pirtle is also back and healthy, and should be starting somewhere in the secondary.  he's a ballplayer.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

defense should still be pretty salty, but you're right, they lost some key guys.  it's my understanding there are some solid pieces moving up as well, though.

HF d line is going to get tossed around by LCMs offensive line. There linebacker will really have to bow their necks if they are going to stop the rungame. Time to see what these solid pieces moving up are all about. They will face big challenges going into their first varsity game as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...