Jump to content

Kamala


baddog

Recommended Posts

is doing an interview on communist news network and has to have her running mate there for the “bobble-head” support. If she can’t handle a softball interview on cnn without Walz, what the heck is she going to do with Putin and XI? 
 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, baddog said:

is doing an interview on communist news network and has to have her running mate there for the “bobble-head” support. If she can’t handle a softball interview on cnn without Walz, what the heck is she going to do with Putin and XI? 
 

This is the hidden content, please

But y'all support a guy who can't beat her!!!!!

 

LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, baddog said:

is doing an interview on communist news network and has to have her running mate there for the “bobble-head” support. If she can’t handle a softball interview on cnn without Walz, what the heck is she going to do with Putin and XI? 
 

This is the hidden content, please

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, baddog said:

is doing an interview on communist news network and has to have her running mate there for the “bobble-head” support. If she can’t handle a softball interview on cnn without Walz, what the heck is she going to do with Putin and XI? 
 

This is the hidden content, please

Trump did an interview with Vance after he selected him as his VP

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Anyone else watching this lying scumbag? Anybody who believes one thing she says is being led to slaughter. What a liar. 

I saw some clips.  She said she never flip flopped on anything.  LOL!  Then she admitted the so-call "Inflation Reduction Act" was nothing more than a way to get the Green New Deal through the back door.  Then later, she went into one of her patented "word salads."  Not sure how many times she had to look to Walzo-Bazzarro to bail her out.  You know, that's why he was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh, brother, she actually said this:  "we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to deadlines around time."  Is there any other way?!  LOL!! 

Kommiemala Harris had one job – don’t blow your first sit-down interview with the press. No word salad. No ‘unburdened by what has been’ mantra. Don’t cackle to cover up for a lack of brain cells.

She couldn’t even do that…

Sitting down with running mate Tim Walz for a pre-taped CNN interview set to air at 9 PM Thursday, a preview clip reveals she’s still an absolute moron.

I wonder how much bad stuff did CNN actually edit out?  Would like to see the full version!

@Big girl  @CardinalBacker @UT alum  @HuntersLaptop2028

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where’s all the Kamala worshippers? Did she impress with her education and resume? Of course not. She’s a word salad dingbat. Here’s the most pertinent question about that “interview”.

Why was it recorded? The whole purpose of an interview is to put one on the spot for an answer. 
 

The debate will be the nail in the coffin. No editing. Don’t allow her to change the rules. Why would anyone need/want to do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Where’s all the Kamala worshippers? Did she impress with her education and resume? Of course not. She’s a word salad dingbat. Here’s the most pertinent question about that “interview”.

Why was it recorded? The whole purpose of an interview is to put one on the spot for an answer. 
 

The debate will be the nail in the coffin. No editing. Don’t allow her to change the rules. Why would anyone need/want to do that?

No doubt about it, and they have Tulsi Gabbard onboard, who absolutely destroyed Harris in the debate and ended her bid for President.

I still have no confidence that half the country will choose what's best for the country, no matter how bad she duffs it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Where’s all the Kamala worshippers? Did she impress with her education and resume? Of course not. She’s a word salad dingbat. Here’s the most pertinent question about that “interview”.

Why was it recorded? The whole purpose of an interview is to put one on the spot for an answer. 
 

The debate will be the nail in the coffin. No editing. Don’t allow her to change the rules. Why would anyone need/want to do that?

Having a law degree is impressive. Do you have one? She wants the mics to be unmuted, because she knows he is going to go on a tangent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is about Kamala’s interview. Do not bring up Trump for your argument. Instead of your comment, why not try and tell me any truths she uttered?

Please stop flaunting hers, and your, educations. I’ve already said I am not impressed and it’s a clear sign of a failed education AND PAYBACK system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CardinalBacker said:

All that matters is "can she win?"  Yes, she can, because of the  R's infatuation with Trump.

 

Look in the mirror, MAGAts.... y'all did this to America by nominating an unelectable turd. 

We are going to have a lot of material to mess with you on if trump wins.

The interview last night didn't move the needle for Kamala......Even CNN said it was "safe" 

Meanwhile Vance is going on CNN and taking reporters questions daily, Trump doing the same with reporters......

Find you a nice chair, cause the polls I'm seeing is Trump starting to gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 30 minute interview and we get 18 tells me the other 12 were WORSE. Almost unbelievable that it could get worse.

When anyone says that the most “significant” and the most “important” to describe something, tells me all I need to know. Her education precedes her.

An edited interview is what the American people get from this buffoon. What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...