Jump to content

Not local !! Thursday night !! Fort bend marshall at Richmond Randle!!


lcm93

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Eazy said:

Randle’s district mate Huntsville took them out in Round 3 last year.  I don’t know who can take them out this year. Maybe Liberty Hill or Brenham, but I think Randle has a good shot and winning Region 3.

Brenham just hung 70 on killeen last night !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Randle caught that sweet spot on the way up in enrollment just like George Ranch a decade ago when they won State. I wouldn't be surprised if Randle wins it twice in a row here in this enrollment period before rezoning 

The Randle running back is much better than the one for Brenham. The kid for Brenham is good but the Randle kid should be ranked one of the top 5 to 10 overall players in the nation when he's a senior if not the top player. He's a different level from anyone I've seen in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, gary-us-bonds said:

Randle caught that sweet spot on the way up in enrollment just like George Ranch a decade ago when they won State. I wouldn't be surprised if Randle wins it twice in a row here in this enrollment period before rezoning 

The Randle running back is much better than the one for Brenham. The kid for Brenham is good but the Randle kid should be ranked one of the top 5 to 10 overall players in the nation when he's a senior if not the top player. He's a different level from anyone I've seen in a long time.

What’s the name? So I can keep a eye on him and watch him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

What’s the name? So I can keep a eye on him and watch him

Landen Williams-Callis. If he isn’t already, I expect a five star rating before it’s all over. I think he already has offers from pretty much everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...