Jump to content

Orangefield (38) @ Anahuac (0) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, hoops784 said:

Oh there is no question OF has better football players. But athletically/talent wise Anahuac has the upper hand. At the skill positions especially. I didn’t see any one from OF that has the talent Coates, Barrier, Richardson, Trotter etc. from Anahuac have. And that’s not a knock on OFAM. OF has tough, disciplined, smart kids who play the game well and that’s why they will win this district

After last night’s performance I don’t see how Anahuac had 1,600 passing in 4 games & 400 rushing. 
 

maybe Orangefield defense did that much better. The Panthers QB had zero time to even think about setting up. 
 

38-0. I think Orangefield talent at QB, RB & receivers was equal or better to those you mentioned for at least this game. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, hoops784 said:

Oh there is no question OF has better football players. But athletically/talent wise Anahuac has the upper hand. At the skill positions especially. I didn’t see any one from OF that has the talent Coates, Barrier, Richardson, Trotter etc. from Anahuac have. And that’s not a knock on OFAM. OF has tough, disciplined, smart kids who play the game well and that’s why they will win this district

 

3 hours ago, hoops784 said:

Oh there is no question OF has better football players. But athletically/talent wise Anahuac has the upper hand. At the skill positions especially. I didn’t see any one from OF that has the talent Coates, Barrier, Richardson, Trotter etc. from Anahuac have. And that’s not a knock on OFAM. OF has tough, disciplined, smart kids who play the game well and that’s why they will win this district

Manning kid has an FBS offer with a school rumored to soon be Power 5.  Forget Anahuac, he’s probably the most athletically talented kid in the district. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TxHoops said:

And also not as athletic as Manning…

Maybe not.

I have to say, when I attended the OF/BC game a few weeks ago, not one player for OF really stood out to me. Maybe it was just a bad game, maybe BC is really that good. I don't know. But OF looked average that night and no player stood out, athletically.

I am going to make a point to go to OF/EC game (unless there is a more intriguing game that night) . Looks like the Bobcats and their new offense have got it rolling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AggiesAreWe said:

Maybe not.

I have to say, when I attended the OF/BC game a few weeks ago, not one player for OF really stood out to me. Maybe it was just a bad game, maybe BC is really that good. I don't know. But OF looked average that night and no player stood out, athletically.

I am going to make a point to go to OF/EC game (unless there is a more intriguing game that night) . Looks like the Bobcats and their new offense have got it rolling.

That we can agree on, OF looked bad that night, I think they are just starting to get comfortable with the seismic shift in offensive philosophy from the past decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, it was not my intention to insult Orangefield at all and it seems like y’all took it that way. Manning kid might be the real deal, I dont know. I watched for a half though and I couldn’t tell you which one he was. 
 

To correct my previous post and maybe make my point more clear: 

Anahuac has the athletes to compete with anybody in the district. Some of the best athletes in the district play for Anahuac, IN MY OPINION. They have the players to not lose to Orangefield 38-0 and I think most people can agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hoops784 said:

For the record, it was not my intention to insult Orangefield at all and it seems like y’all took it that way. Manning kid might be the real deal, I dont know. I watched for a half though and I couldn’t tell you which one he was. 
 

To correct my previous post and maybe make my point more clear: 

Anahuac has the athletes to compete with anybody in the district. Some of the best athletes in the district play for Anahuac, IN MY OPINION. They have the players to not lose to Orangefield 38-0 and I think most people can agree

I definitely expected a more competitive game & yes Anahuac definitely has better athletes than 38-0 In my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Maybe not.

I have to say, when I attended the OF/BC game a few weeks ago, not one player for OF really stood out to me. Maybe it was just a bad game, maybe BC is really that good. I don't know. But OF looked average that night and no player stood out, athletically.

I am going to make a point to go to OF/EC game (unless there is a more intriguing game that night) . Looks like the Bobcats and their new offense have got it rolling.

Obviously BC is pretty good.  Other than Manning breaking off a long run toward the end of the game, not many highlights.  BC is bigger, stronger and faster than OF and has one of the best QBs in the area.  
 

That said, they also play in different classifications.  And although I’m not the biggest transitive guy, OF boat racing Hardin 59-zip who then plays EC to 28-22 the following week makes me wonder why people were shocked by the score last night.  You can never overlook the BISD West Buccaneers and I’m sure the Bobcats won’t.  Coldspring is another team to watch in that district. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Obviously BC is pretty good.  Other than Manning breaking off a long run toward the end of the game, not many highlights.  BC is bigger, stronger and faster than OF and has one of the best QBs in the area.  
 

That said, they also play in different classifications.  And although I’m not the biggest transitive guy, OF boat racing Hardin 59-zip who then plays EC to 28-22 the following week makes me wonder why people were shocked by the score last night.  You can never overlook the BISD West Buccaneers and I’m sure the Bobcats won’t.  Coldspring is another team to watch in that district. 

I had several coaches (from 3 different teams) tell me that watched film of the Hardin/OF game that said that OF is not 59 points better than Hardin. Was just one of those games that snowballed on Hardin. It was 21-0 halfway thru 1st Q due to botched opening kickoff and two fumbles on first two possessions. But like Parcells always said, you are what your record and score says you are.

I admit, I was very surprised with the score from last night. I did pick Anahuac to win and certainly did not have them being shutout to the tune of 38-0. 

Contrary to your comment about the score should not be surprising, I strongly disagree and from the looks of the pickems and comments, others do too.

Maybe you are just smarter than everyone. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I had several coaches (from 3 different teams) tell me that watched film of the Hardin/OF game that said that OF is not 59 points better than Hardin. Was just one of those games that snowballed on Hardin. It was 21-0 halfway thru 1st Q due to botched opening kickoff and two fumbles on first two possessions. But like Parcells always said, you are what your record and score says you are.

I admit, I was very surprised with the score from last night. I did pick Anahuac to win and certainly did not have them being shutout to the tune of 38-0. 

Contrary to your comment about the score should not be surprising, I strongly disagree and from the looks of the pickems and comments, others do too.

Maybe you are just smarter than everyone. lol

Well, not EVERYONE but clearly smarter than most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Big TE/DE for Anahuac is committed to University of Louisiana Rajun Cajuns.

From the 2 quarters of the game that I caught it looked like they weren't using him enough on offense. On defense they had him dropping back in coverage instead of blitzing the edges. He probably caused 3 or 4 of the 6 turnovers against Woodville blitzing the edges and pressuring the QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,114
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    anjali43
    Newest Member
    anjali43
    Joined



  • Posts

    • He made the comment as a business man he hated overtime. He never said or implied he wanted to do away with it. He has said overtime should not be taxed. That will benefit the refinery workers in our area big time…..as well as nurses. Not only would you not pay taxes and see the benefit immediately on your paycheck, my guess that at the end of the year, you would subtract all the overtime from your total wages, thus lowering your taxable imcome.
    • Well I thought it would be a better matchup for us more so than us versus yall and we got whooped 🤷🏾‍♂️ we'll see, long time before Ball High meets Lufkin though. 
    • Very critical win for Crosby last night. At no point has the current regime given me any reason to think Crosby should be able to pencil in wins but for the sake of discussion I will for FB Kempner who we play two weeks from now and also Porter who we play a couple of weeks after that. That means if Crosby can beat Kingwood Park next week we’ll most likely finish district play 5-2 and in at least 3rd place.    That being, the team could be a lot better if we had a competent offensive coach. Crosby’s offensive philosophy is to give it to Yarbrough and hope he breaks it which is why we lose to team with above average defensive talent. Crosby’s TE Landen Hammer is 6’2” and about 210lbs with crazy ball skills, an absolute mismatch problem and got one target last night. Friendswood realized Crosby had some playmakers on the edges and lots of times gave the receivers a 10 yard cushion. The problem is that Willis doesn’t know that so not once did we just raise up, throw it out to the receiver and give them an opportunity to be an athlete and make a play. So now that we’ve averaged 8 completions per game through our first four contest because 50% of the time Willis chooses to swap out 50% of the offense we look like we “don’t have the receiving talent that we used to.” Yarbrough probably had close to 300 rushing yards last night but I wouldn’t be surprised if he had 35 carries. I like our backup RB but there are several kids who could help Crosby more at that position and Willis chooses not to play them there and feed Yarbrough to the point he couldn’t even finish the game last night. He continues to display an inability to efficiently use his personnel which is why we get blow out by any team with at least equal talent. Maybe something changes but Willis being 6-19 his last two and a half years on the sideline and his inability to shake the Cedar Park model don’t give much hope, which is unfortunate for the kids. 
    • Big girl is trying to make Oprah sound like Bam Morris, who was busted with 220# of weed in the trunk of his car. When the cops opened the truck and found the weed, Bam said,”That’s not mine”. Give me a break.
    • Aggies with the “brunch” game today. I think Missouri will be a tough matchup. Playing at Kyle may have an effect.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...