BadgerNation Posted October 6 Report Posted October 6 BC should take this one with ease. Give me BC by 17+. BC has surprised me and they are firing on all cylinders right now! I don’t see them slowing down anytime soon. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted October 7 Report Posted October 7 I think this one will be a more competitive game. We should still be picked to win, but I don't see us beating them by 4 TDs or anything crazy like that. On paper they're going to be our toughest opponent yet. Quote
Billyjohn Posted October 7 Report Posted October 7 1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said: I think this one will be a more competitive game. We should still be picked to win, but I don't see us beating them by 4 TDs or anything crazy like that. On paper they're going to be our toughest opponent yet. Considering lcm beat them by 5 TDs I think yall should easily scorch them as well. Split Down The Bayou 1 Quote
BLUE_LEFT_LEFT_ONE_ELEVEN Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 Hutch and the Cardinals by 40 BC is BACK!!! Catcher In The Wry 1 Quote
setxathlete14 Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 I'm now convinced bc is it until proven otherwise Quote
3rdandGreen Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 BC cashed out against Vidor, who LCM barely scraped by. LCM beat HJ by 36 points. Give me the same if not more for BC -40. Quote
Billyjohn Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 3 hours ago, 3rdandGreen said: BC cashed out against Vidor, who LCM barely scraped by. LCM beat HJ by 36 points. Give me the same if not more for BC -40. From my understanding vidors stud on both sides of the ball #28 went out early in the game not much after he popped a 50 yard touchdown. I’m not saying Vidor would of won, but would of been a lot closer if he would’ve gone down. Quote
bullets13 Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 Both teams have improved, but BC was quite a bit better than HJ last year, and the hawks have probably lost some ground from that point. Quote
Orange County Baller Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 2 hours ago, Billyjohn said: From my understanding vidors stud on both sides of the ball #28 went out early in the game not much after he popped a 50 yard touchdown. I’m not saying Vidor would of won, but would of been a lot closer if he would’ve gone down. #28 played the first half and I believe he was held out starting in the 3Q. Quote
BayouRunner Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 4 hours ago, Billyjohn said: From my understanding vidors stud on both sides of the ball #28 went out early in the game not much after he popped a 50 yard touchdown. I’m not saying Vidor would of won, but would of been a lot closer if he would’ve gone down. Come on billyjohn…. Let’s be real Quote
Split Down The Bayou Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 4 hours ago, Billyjohn said: From my understanding vidors stud on both sides of the ball #28 went out early in the game not much after he popped a 50 yard touchdown. I’m not saying Vidor would of won, but would of been a lot closer if he would’ve gone down. Other than that big run, BC shut him down. I don't think it would have made a difference. 28 is a good player, but has little support around him. Quote
3rdandGreen Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 4 hours ago, Billyjohn said: From my understanding vidors stud on both sides of the ball #28 went out early in the game not much after he popped a 50 yard touchdown. I’m not saying Vidor would of won, but would of been a lot closer if he would’ve gone down. If this was week 2 I'd agree possibly, but BC has proven themselves to me at least within this area of competition regardless of #28. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted October 8 Report Posted October 8 2 hours ago, Split Down The Bayou said: Other than that big run, BC shut him down. I don't think it would have made a difference. 28 is a good player, but has little support around him. Yeah… the pirate o-line wasn’t getting it done. Quote
Billyjohn Posted October 9 Report Posted October 9 5 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: Yeah… the pirate o-line wasn’t getting it done. Just out of curiosity who in the district has the best o line ? Quote
CardinalBacker Posted October 9 Report Posted October 9 7 hours ago, Billyjohn said: Just out of curiosity who in the district has the best o line ? That’s hard to say because I’ve only watched BC, Lum, and Vidor. Vidor’s O Line was having PROBLEMS. It could have just been that we made them appear to be bad, but I don’t think so. We looked like the Chain Gang of old up front last Friday. I don’t know how many stops the cards made in the pirate backfield. Tiger33 1 Quote
setxathlete14 Posted October 9 Report Posted October 9 8 hours ago, Billyjohn said: Just out of curiosity who in the district has the best o line ? Whoever gets a playoff win. That's who. Quote
WO-S 89 Posted October 9 Report Posted October 9 This Bridge City district will be all done in the first rd of playoffs. They have a bad match up in rd 1. Kilgore. Chapel Hill. Henderson. Lindale Right99JOH 1 Quote
FALCONS2026 Posted October 9 Report Posted October 9 3 hours ago, WO-S 89 said: This Bridge City district will be all done in the first rd of playoffs. They have a bad match up in rd 1. Kilgore. Chapel Hill. Henderson. Lindale You forgot Pine Tree.......Lindale probably won't make it. That district is loaded. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.