Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Defense showed up second half and just showed who they were as a unit impressive job to shutdown a team for an entire half.

Offense did enough tonight and did it early which is whats key, we get a lead and we have the defense that can hold it.

Posted
10 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I really like #0 and #2 for Crosby. They definitely are (and should be) the center pieces on each side of the ball for the Cougars.

I thought #2 was going to Arizona but I am out of the loop on this stuff

Posted

Last night was the first time I’ve seen Crosby this year. With what I saw from the personnel on the field, I thought the staff did a good job with the game plan. I’ve heard some displeasure. My observation was that Crosby looked pretty good. Of course, the focus is on 2. But, it should be IMHO. He’s a solid player.

Congrats on the win. I think this pretty much tied up a PO spot.

Posted

Saw a few glimpses of the old Crosby out there. Unfortunate for the other QB getting injured however we let Lott get in rhythm and it pays off. Folks keep saying CHS doesn’t have the talent. That’s simply not true. But in order to stay within the rules I’ll keep my opinion to myself. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, MrFleet23 said:

Saw a few glimpses of the old Crosby out there. Unfortunate for the other QB getting injured however we let Lott get in rhythm and it pays off. Folks keep saying CHS doesn’t have the talent. That’s simply not true. But in order to stay within the rules I’ll keep my opinion to myself. 

I did a whole post about this many years ago (gonna see if I can find it and bump it to the top), but it's really not difficult to state an opinion without violating our rules, even when the opinion is about a coach or his coaching. but if you don't trust yourself to be able to stay within the rules, it's always best to err on the side of caution ;)

Posted
1 hour ago, Austin1985 said:

Yeah.  With respect to certain Crosby fans, I was really looking for a non-talented, disorganized team out there but I was pleasantly surprised. 

Go Cougs

I don’t think any Crosby fans said they don’t have the talent. Quite the contrary, they don’t have the leadership. 

Posted
1 hour ago, CCRed said:

I don’t think any Crosby fans said they don’t have the talent. Quite the contrary, they don’t have the leadership. 

Ah.  Didn't fully comprehend what 14.2 was putting down.  Looks like everyone's playing where they supposed to 

Posted
On 10/11/2024 at 1:24 PM, Austin1985 said:

Ah.  Didn't fully comprehend what 14.2 was putting down.  Looks like everyone's playing where they supposed to 

It looks like that because we played better overall. He’s been moving some players around the last couple of weeks and actually trying to get some of his athletes the ball which is a lot more “offensive coordinating” than he’s been doing during his time in Crosby. We’ll take the progress where we can get it though. 
 

We’re 3-0 in district play because we have better football players than three teams we’ve played. Again, you take the progress from the beginning of the year where we were losing to a team like Dayton who has half the talent we do. The issue is being consistently blown out by teams with equal or slightly better talent.  
 

Crosby is benefitting record-wise from a weak district but it’s helping us learn to win again. Thursday was the most swagger I’ve seen a Crosby team play with since Willis has been our coach. Wins are wins but if you’re objectively looking at what Crosby is considering progress after a year and a half under Willis it’s a game where we play two good quarters and then get shut out until late in the fourth quarter against a team with not near the personnel of La Porte or Angleton. Crosby could be a lot better than we are but I will admit this is the best we’ve looked under Willis. I guess it’s just going to take the kids overplaying his system and play-calling to achieve the results the last two coaches did? 

Posted
On 10/11/2024 at 9:55 AM, OlDawg said:

Last night was the first time I’ve seen Crosby this year. With what I saw from the personnel on the field, I thought the staff did a good job with the game plan. I’ve heard some displeasure. My observation was that Crosby looked pretty good. Of course, the focus is on 2. But, it should be IMHO. He’s a solid player.

Congrats on the win. I think this pretty much tied up a PO spot.

So this is the first game we have not used alternating QB's. This is apparently due to an injury which is really sad and you never want to see a kid get hurt. Continuity was there tonight, the passing game looked much better. 

If I am being honest, I think the biggest thing was the QB knew if he did make a mistake he was going to right back out there to make up for it and I wonder what the effect of always wondering if you're going to be taken out at any time in the game was doing to that young sophomore who played a heck of a game 

Prior to this game those "new QB for 2 plays" were completely disjointing the offense even when the plays were successful. Also we've started to do this overload to one side toss zone play that has killed everyone in district so far that we did not run prior to districts end, who knows maybe if we put our kids in space earlier in the season we might have an extra win or maybe even two this season. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...