Jump to content

Silsbee (14) @ Hamshire-Fannett (35) - FINAL


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, fridaynightlites said:

If not for that onside kick this could still be a shutout. Terrible call there was no need for that. Coaches will be rethinking that all weekend

I could be wrong, but I don't think it was an intentional onsides kick. I think he muffled a pooch kick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

Man we have thrown 4 pick 6s in the last 2 games 

I dont understand or might just be lack of knowledge but we have been throwing in double and triple coverage . Is the coach telling him who to throw the ball too or does he  have the option to read the defense and go to the second guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mballler#1 said:

Why is Silsbee running such a vanilla or a bland offense this is district gotta open up the playbook.

I feel like its been the same plays last 5 to 7 years. The i formation is not working because thats a power formation and the oline is not blocking well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiger33 said:

I dont understand or might just be lack of knowledge but we have been throwing in double and triple coverage . Is the coach telling him who to throw the ball too or does he  have the option to read the defense and go to the second guy?

The option? Yes. The ability? Dunno. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take away the pick 6s and HF didn't score in the 2nd half. Silsbee just looked slow to me tonight. Maybe due to playing on grass? RBs looked slower. WRs and defense looked slower. No explosion on offense. Your right basic slow development on each play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...