Jump to content

West Orange Stark vs Shepherd


Recommended Posts

This could be a rest in the 2nd half game. But we can't look ahead to the trip to Silsbee next week. We've been surprised before when it's looks easy. Shepherd has played well so far. They come in with a 2 game win streak. Holding on to a 3 way tie for 1st. They scored 50+ in their 3 wins. 34+ in the 3 losses. WOS defense allowing 22.8 ppg. It's closer to the traditional numbers expected from the Mustangs. Helps when the offense is able to take advantage of those stops. If we can clean up the little things and keep the coaches off the field 👀, maybe those untimely flags can stay off the turf. #every second counts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, monknuk68 said:

The offense will score yes, how much will the defense give up. I agree with all those that say even though the 50 defense is back, it is not the same as CT or Hooks area.

But it could have been, if they would have never changed it in the first place and kept most of the old coaching staff the ran away.  Discipline might not have drop. But it is what it is and here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bring back the 50 defense said:

But it could have been, if they would have never changed it in the first place and kept most of the old coaching staff the ran away.  Discipline might not have drop. But it is what it is and here we are.

I agree. Young coaches want to make a name for themselves. They do want to continue with what works if someone else gets the credit. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BBfan061 said:

Whys that?

No worries, probably.  Just saying that a couple or 3 of Shepherd's linemen looked pretty athletic, based on what little I've seen in the video clips. #88, if I recall right, along with the right tackle, were opening up some holes, in their loss to whoever they were playing, I can't recall now.  Anyway ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...