Jump to content

Playing surfaces


Vini vidi

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Vini vidi said:

Grass or turf playing surfaces. 
which and why?

Personally I prefer a grass field. 
Completely get why field turf is popular and all the reasons why but still like grass better

Not that it’s not a fair question, but it comes up almost every year. You did not follow your own advice. You said which surface (grass), but not why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Vini vidi said:

Grass or turf playing surfaces. 
which and why?

Personally I prefer a grass field. 
Completely get why field turf is popular and all the reasons why but still like grass better

Grass, if it's maintained properly, which it hardly ever is.

Otherwise, field turf is the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer grass, but I understand why turf works better for most schools.  I was a kicker for the football team, but soccer was where I excelled.  I'm so glad I didn't have to play 90% of my soccer games on turf like these kids today.  In football it makes the game quicker and keeps the field cleaner, but in soccer it speeds things up unnaturally and the bounces are horrible.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Grass, if it's maintained properly, which it hardly ever is.

Otherwise, field turf is the way to go.

Maintained properly is how the district chooses to keep the grass.  Back in the 70s a visiting coach to PNG asked how we play football in that "cow pasture."  referring to the fact that the grass was kept a little high so we were used to practicing in it, and the opponents were not.  So the question is, turf is fair for everybody, grass may not be!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AHUDDLESTON said:

A lot of the young coaches don't know the joy of washing grass stains out of uniforms or lining the fields every week thanks to turf.

Wednesday after practice painting parties. 
now instead of grass and dirt those coaches are having to get black infill stains out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good grass field is the best but good grass fields are nearly impossible to find. At a high school level you will never play on two grass fields that are equal, and hardly ever a truly good (level, flat, good grass,  well maintained) grass field. Especially at smaller schools where you are playing on weeds, dirt spots, crawfish holes, and uneven surface. Turf is best for high school is provides the most consistency across the board. Grass is better at higher levels because it can be maintained to the proper standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Looper said:

A good grass field is the best but good grass fields are nearly impossible to find. At a high school level you will never play on two grass fields that are equal, and hardly ever a truly good (level, flat, good grass,  well maintained) grass field. Especially at smaller schools where you are playing on weeds, dirt spots, crawfish holes, and uneven surface. Turf is best for high school is provides the most consistency across the board. Grass is better at higher levels because it can be maintained to the proper standard.

So turf doesn't have to be maintained?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turf fields are easier to maintain, they are playable in wet weather.  The technology has gotten much better over the years.

Grass is better IMO, the downfall is maintenance, not all grass fields are the same or maintained the same. Wet and cold weather is a problem. Most schools do not over seed their fields, so you have a brown field with painted dirt later in the fall.  If you have ever played in the mud on a cold night, well you will remember it. I do. As far as early turf days, playing at Sam Houston, you might as well have been playing in the parking lot. 

IMO there are more ACL, high ankle sprain and turf toe injuries today with turf, than a player would have from playing on a well maintained grass field.

It's a toss up economically, however you do see more NFL and College teams reverting back to grass.  The turf technology will get better, just don't know how close the turf manufacturers can get to REAL grass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PackAttack said:

Turf fields are easier to maintain, they are playable in wet weather.  The technology has gotten much better over the years.

Grass is better IMO, the downfall is maintenance, not all grass fields are the same or maintained the same. Wet and cold weather is a problem. Most schools do not over seed their fields, so you have a brown field with painted dirt later in the fall.  If you have ever played in the mud on a cold night, well you will remember it. I do. As far as early turf days, playing at Sam Houston, you might as well have been playing in the parking lot. 

IMO there are more ACL, high ankle sprain and turf toe injuries today with turf, than a player would have from playing on a well maintained grass field.

It's a toss up economically, however you do see more NFL and College teams reverting back to grass.  The turf technology will get better, just don't know how close the turf manufacturers can get to REAL grass.

It's not just injuries with turf. There are more staph infections with turf fields than there are with grass fields.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,126
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NDN1982
    Newest Member
    NDN1982
    Joined


  • Posts

    • So this is the first game we have not used alternating QB's. This is apparently due to an injury which is really sad and you never want to see a kid get hurt. Continuity was there tonight, the passing game looked much better.  If I am being honest, I think the biggest thing was the QB knew if he did make a mistake he was going to right back out there to make up for it and I wonder what the effect of always wondering if you're going to be taken out at any time in the game was doing to that young sophomore who played a heck of a game  Prior to this game those "new QB for 2 plays" were completely disjointing the offense even when the plays were successful. Also we've started to do this overload to one side toss zone play that has killed everyone in district so far that we did not run prior to districts end, who knows maybe if we put our kids in space earlier in the season we might have an extra win or maybe even two this season.     
    • I keep hearing that but yet to see it. (at the RB at least, some recievers have made a few plays.) 
    • Sorry, yes I did mean quiet. Lot's of excitement each week around BC, just didn't seem as much after this week. I'm excited for them and hoping for an undefeated regular season. I do not believe BC has ever done this, not even when they won a state championship in the 60's. I am not saying they are going to win a state championship this year, just a chance to be undefeated before post season begins. 
    • My point about the turf in Woodville is that it does not have the black rubber pellets as a filler. That turf actually has wood chips/sawdust as it's filler. They actually have to water their turf so that it doesn't dry out and become a dust bowl. First time I stepped foot on that field a few years ago, I was like "what is this stuff?" One of their coaches told me it was wood chips and they actually had to water it regularly. The wood chip filler helps keep the field cooler than the rubber pellets.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...