Dept of defense: effective sept 27 (for upcoming civil unrest)

[5GallonBucket]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

I tried to copy and paste the section that catches my attention, but it wouldn’t let me.

read section 3.3, especially 3.3 c

kathleen hicks deputy secretary of defense….another dei hire🤔

 

like to get @tvc184 thoughts

 

[5GallonBucket]

Sorry. It’s actually 3.3. 2c

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

I tried to copy and paste the section that catches my attention, but it wouldn’t let me.

read section 3.3, especially 3.3 c

kathleen hicks deputy secretary of defense….another dei hire🤔

 

like to get @tvc184 thoughts

 

Is any woman or minority a DEI hire to you?

[5GallonBucket]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Is any woman or minority a DEI hire to you?

Go figure

No.

dont get upset and try to peg someone a certain way when one questions a hire for something your party created.

I just want the most qualified no matter race or gender(which there is only 2)

 

[thetragichippy]

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

Is any woman or minority a DEI hire to you?

Depends on the hiring method....When Biden said his VP would be a woman of color.......BAM, DEI hire

If a company hires a woman of color based on their qualifications, that would NOT be a DEI hire......

I think the difference is caveman simple

[tvc184]

5 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Sorry. It’s actually 3.3. 2c

What do you want to know, the apparent intent?

[5GallonBucket]

20 hours ago, tvc184 said:

What do you want to know, the apparent intent?

Is this different than prior policies…..intelligence gathering….to now adding direct lethal involvement.
 

I just found it worrisome.  I know national guard has been called in in the past….la riots, Detroit 67

 

[tvc184]

23 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Is this different than prior policies…..intelligence gathering….to now adding direct lethal involvement.
 

I just found it worrisome.  I know national guard has been called in in the past….la riots, Detroit 67

 

I “think” the intelligence gathering is the authority to pass on intel information to local authorities. Prior to 9-11 and even now, some of the possible critical information isn’t readily shared. Some of these DoD memorandums mentioned in the section that you cited go back to 2005 so in that era. Having been in federal task force operations in my career, I have been given extremely limited intelligence due to my position at the time. I believe that this opens it up a bit to share a little more information a little easier. 

 The deadly force appears (after reading additional linked documents) to be authorized to protect DoD and federal institutions/properties. It also says to support state/local law enforcement at their request.

Certainly the National Guard has state policing authority under the governor (unless activated into federal duty by the president). I don’t think this DoD document authorizes the DoD to independently act with National Guard authority if that was your question. 

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, tvc184 said:

I don’t think this DoD document authorizes the DoD to independently act with National Guard authority if that was your question. 

I just had a faaaaaar right guy try and tell me this was authorizing the federal government to use lethal force on "perceived" threats.....

I would not be surprised if this guy has a fall out shelter under his garage