Jump to content

Report

  • Optionally enter a message with your report.

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,128
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    wingsup
    Newest Member
    wingsup
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I “think” the intelligence gathering is the authority to pass on intel information to local authorities. Prior to 9-11 and even now, some of the possible critical information isn’t readily shared. Some of these DoD memorandums mentioned in the section that you cited go back to 2005 so in that era. Having been in federal task force operations in my career, I have been given extremely limited intelligence due to my position at the time. I believe that this opens it up a bit to share a little more information a little easier.   The deadly force appears (after reading additional linked documents) to be authorized to protect DoD and federal institutions/properties. It also says to support state/local law enforcement at their request. Certainly the National Guard has state policing authority under the governor (unless activated into federal duty by the president). I don’t think this DoD document authorizes the DoD to independently act with National Guard authority if that was your question. 
    • it was your first line. doesn't matter that nobody needs to usher him off the stage if he never shuts up and 60% of the country hates him.  and you can say what you want about him not getting confused, his speeches are getting harder and harder to follow.  funny how he (and republicans in general) correctly claimed that Sleepy Joe was too old to run or be effective 4 years ago.  But here we are now and Trump is even older than that, and looks and acts it. Too bad the republicans didn't perform a coup and install a decent candidate.  
    • 1. Atascocita 2. Lufkin 3. PA Memorial 4. Angleton 5. La Porte  6. Huntsville 7. Lake Creek 8. Huffman Hargrave  9. LCM 10. Bridge City 11. Vidor 12. HF 13. West Orange-Stark 14. East Chambers 15. Orangefield  16. Teague 17. Fairfield 18. Palestine Westwood 19. Woodville 20. Trinity 21. Garrison  22. Joaquin  23. Shelbyville 24. Deweyville 25. Sabine Pass 
    • Read it again in the Yoda voice. Plus I think Aggies summed this up correctly. Honestly when I started crunching numbers I thought WOS would be lower and Jasper up high. Also why I added the others to show the differences in team schedules. For years WOS was downed for playing weak district opponent. Even heard it said that half of the 500 wins were against sub 500 teams. It's doesn't matter. You play the teams put in front of you to the best of your abilities and the outcome speaks for itself.  Much respect to Coach Crumedy for testing his young team after an unexpected deep run last season. On the other hand, I wish we were still playing some of our former rivals. But what good does it do to beat up on neighbor OC schools. Now after more research, I see the benifit of Hickman's pre district schedule. We have to build up to where he expects us to be. Can't get the Carthages and Hitchcocks until we prove to be a formidable foe.
    • West Fork's coach is a PN-G grad, if I'm not mistaken.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...