Reagan Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 When I first heard this, I told my wife I bet this judge was appointed by either clinton, obama or biden. And sure enough it was biden. How did I know? Because this judge is not following the law. To me, this should be cause for removal. How many know that the House has this authority? @UT alum @HuntersLaptop2028 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 How obvious does it need to be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 1 hour ago, Reagan said: When I first heard this, I told my wife I bet this judge was appointed by either clinton, obama or biden. And sure enough it was biden. How did I know? Because this judge is not following the law. To me, this should be cause for removal. How many know that the House has this authority? @UT alum @HuntersLaptop2028 I hope no one knows this because the House cannot remove a federal judge. Only the Senate can remove a federal judge by a 2/3 vote. I doubt that you could get 27 Democrat senators to support removal. thetragichippy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted October 25 Author Report Share Posted October 25 18 minutes ago, tvc184 said: I hope no one knows this because the House cannot remove a federal judge. Only the Senate can remove a federal judge by a 2/3 vote. I doubt that you could get 27 Democrat senators to support removal. You are right. The House impeaches and the Senate removes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1 Posted Monday at 05:12 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:12 PM Misleading headline, but I'd use that to for clicks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted Monday at 09:51 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:51 PM On 10/25/2024 at 12:54 PM, Reagan said: When I first heard this, I told my wife I bet this judge was appointed by either clinton, obama or biden. And sure enough it was biden. How did I know? Because this judge is not following the law. To me, this should be cause for removal. How many know that the House has this authority? @UT alum @HuntersLaptop2028 It’s the freakin’ law. Jeez, do you ever think for yourself? This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This explanation comes from the Secretary of State of the reddest state in the U.S. You are participating in the spread of an outright lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted Wednesday at 07:21 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 07:21 PM US Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge voter rolls of aliens. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Reagan and thetragichippy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted Wednesday at 11:03 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 11:03 PM 3 hours ago, tvc184 said: US Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge voter rolls of aliens. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Then Federal Law got changed by an unelected body. That’s called a Kangaroo Court. LumRaiderFan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago 5 hours ago, UT alum said: Then Federal Law got changed by an unelected body. That’s called a Kangaroo Court. No, you just ignore the parts of the Constitution that you don’t like. thetragichippy, Ty Cobb and 5GallonBucket 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted 19 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 19 hours ago 5 hours ago, UT alum said: Then Federal Law got changed by an unelected body. That’s called a Kangaroo Court. OK, apparently you think the Supreme Court is wrong. So, fill us in on where the problem is! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted 19 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 19 hours ago On 10/28/2024 at 12:12 PM, Bobcat1 said: Misleading headline, but I'd use that to for clicks. Explain the misleading headline! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted 19 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 19 hours ago 9 hours ago, tvc184 said: US Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge voter rolls of aliens. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Are these DEI hires or just plain marxist? But, now we know why they were put on the Supreme Court! @UT alum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 13 hours ago, Reagan said: Are these DEI hires or just plain marxist? But, now we know why they were put on the Supreme Court! @UT alum They voted to uphold the law as written and passed. It’ll be interesting to see how many come off the rolls. Statistically irrelevant is my guess. Even more interesting will be how many are mistakenly removed and don’t have time to restore their right before Tuesday. The law was that way for a good reason. The appeals court upheld the lower court Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 13 hours ago, Reagan said: OK, apparently you think the Supreme Court is wrong. So, fill us in on where the problem is! Not wrong. Whatever the court rules becomes right by definition. I don’t agree and personally think they ruled incorrectly but that and $1 will buy you a cup of coffee. I hope some reporting done on who lost their vote because they were “suspected” incorrectly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 23 minutes ago, UT alum said: They voted to uphold the law as written and passed. It’ll be interesting to see how many come off the rolls. Statistically irrelevant is my guess. Even more interesting will be how many are mistakenly removed and don’t have time to restore their right before Tuesday. The law was that way for a good reason. The appeals court upheld the lower court So you and your communist regime want non-citizen invaders to vote in elections. What a traitor to those who gave their lives so that our rights could live on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 36 minutes ago, UT alum said: Statistically irrelevant is my guess. Based on your statement it won't matter if their vote is counted or not. So why not make sure they are valid? I think you based your statement on the Democratic talking point of "no widespread fraud"..... Right now in Pennsylvania they are examining 2500 ballets in one county and there are 2 other counties that are examining ballets - 2500 ballets may not be defines as "wide spread" but as close as this race is, it might determine an outcome...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Based on your statement it won't matter if their vote is counted or not. So why not make sure they are valid? I think you based your statement on the Democratic talking point of "no widespread fraud"..... Right now in Pennsylvania they are examining 2500 ballets in one county and there are 2 other counties that are examining ballets - 2500 ballets may not be defines as "wide spread" but as close as this race is, it might determine an outcome...... It’s not a Democratic talking point. It’s a fact. As for your first remark, it’s not about the relevance of the vote. It’s about the accuracy of the poll list. In a city council election decided by one vote it would count bigly. In a national election the number is statistically insignificant. Our nation has the best election system in the world, but at the same time any system always has room for improvement. As for the Pennsylvania deal, it is relevant in which county the allegation was made and who made it. I’ll bet no significant evidence of fraud is found. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT alum Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 32 minutes ago, baddog said: So you and your communist regime want non-citizen invaders to vote in elections. What a traitor to those who gave their lives so that our rights could live on. I think it is reasonable to “set” the poll list 90 days before an election.. If it could be meddled with right up to Election Day, voters incorrectly removed would not have time to cure their vote and would be denied their right. I don’t think non citizens should be allowed to vote because it is against the law. Use the other 21 months between federal elections to clean the voter rolls. Why do you make such a wild assumption just because my opinion differs from yours. Traitor? Really? You need to chill, man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 minutes ago, UT alum said: It’s not a Democratic talking point. It’s a fact. It is not a fact.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 10 minutes ago, UT alum said: I think it is reasonable to “set” the poll list 90 days before an election.. If it could be meddled with right up to Election Day, voters incorrectly removed would not have time to cure their vote and would be denied their right. I don’t think non citizens should be allowed to vote because it is against the law. Use the other 21 months between federal elections to clean the voter rolls. Why do you make such a wild assumption just because my opinion differs from yours. Traitor? Really? You need to chill, man. Don’t tell me to chill. How many years have we been voting in this country? Just here lately has there been problems. Why? Because of a hostile takeover through our voting system. Call me crazy, call me anything you want. It’s what the left is good at. I don’t mince words. It’s communism, and anyone who takes up for illegal voting rights is with them. Your opinion is just that. Voting rights belongs to Americans. If they are tampered in any way, we become Venezuela. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.