Jump to content

West Orange Stark vs Hamshire Fannett


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, fridaynightlites said:

Hamshire hasn't gotten too much rain this week. The ditches are dry even and I'm showing 30% chance friday and 0% Thursday. If the weather holds what are the odds we see the outcome that silsbee and Jasper fans didn't see coming... a blowout... 

I doubt this game is a blowout 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A wet field definitely benefits WOS.  HF’s sophomore running back has improved since taking over for Augustine after his season ending injury, but WOS definitely has a major advantage on the ground.  For HF to win this one they’ve got to be sharp through the air, and wet conditions aren’t ideal.  Hopefully the rain holds off and we see how these teams do strength Vs. strength. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

A wet field definitely benefits WOS.  HF’s sophomore running back has improved since taking over for Augustine after his season ending injury, but WOS definitely has a major advantage on the ground.  For HF to win this one they’ve got to be sharp through the air, and wet conditions aren’t ideal.  Hopefully the rain holds off and we see how these teams do strength Vs. strength. 

Is Hamshire Fannett the faster team of the two? If not I don’t see how the wet field would benefit WOS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BBfan061 said:

Is Hamshire Fannett the faster team of the two? If not I don’t see how the wet field would benefit WOS

overall, no. but their offense is through the air. they run great routes and have a fantastic quarterback, arguably the best in the area.  a wet field and a wet ball will benefit WOS if it becomes necessary to keep it on the ground more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, fridaynightlites said:

I doubt it too, just like I doubted the silsbee game and jasper game would be blowouts. I see it 42-35 HF 

The silsbee game didn't shock me, but the Jasper game did after they arguably should've beaten WOS the week before.  42-0 after three quarters and Jasper couldn't have had more than a couple of first downs at that point, after scoring 5 touchdowns the week before on the chain gang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...