Guitar Man Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago Big game with a lot on the line for both teams. They will both need every advantage they can get to compete with who they will be drawing in the first round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right99JOH Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago HH by 17+ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBfan061 Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago Give me Huffman by 2-3 TDs Right99JOH 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theSHOW1 Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago Huffman 49 BC 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BC Alum Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago BC will have to play great in all phases of the game to get the win. BC will have to contain HH running back #12 and wrap him up on every tackle. I did watch the HH/LCM game and HH defense is not that good. I think BC will be able to score and it will come down to how good BC plays Defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago On the Bayou in November? Give me BC in a close one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmashMouth Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago If I'm being honest, I've never liked HH (shell shock from when they dominated and whipped our butt a few times), and I always felt sorry for BC until they audibled the "RED-WHITE OPT-AROUND". But since I don't consider HH to be a local team, I will root for BC. I wish somehow they both could lose, but that ain't gonna happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FALCONS2026 Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 11 minutes ago, SmashMouth said: If I'm being honest, I've never liked HH (shell shock from when they dominated and whipped our butt a few times), and I always felt sorry for BC until they audibled the "RED-WHITE OPT-AROUND". But since I don't consider HH to be a local team, I will root for BC. I wish somehow they both could lose, Lol.....Well the "winner" gets last year's state runner up and the loser gets a 4 hour road trip.....seems like a lose/lose to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOSdrummer99 Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 🌲 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 5A/6A are still the only ones using the homefield Bi-District format. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 20 minutes ago, AshlyHasBeen said: 5A/6A are still the only ones using the homefield Bi-District format. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Districts opposing each other in 1st Rd. can agree to the top 2 seeds hosting. 9-4A DI and 10-4A DI has made that agreement. AshlyHasBeen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guitar Man Posted 9 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 22 minutes ago, AshlyHasBeen said: 5A/6A are still the only ones using the homefield Bi-District format. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I thought that it applied to 4A D1 as well, or at least that is what has been said multiple times by multiple people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, Guitar Man said: I thought that it applied to 4A D1 as well, or at least that is what has been said multiple times by multiple people. No. Only 6A/5A is mandated by UIL. Districts facing each other in 1st round can have an agreement to have the top 2 seeds host. Districts 9-4A DI and 10-4A DI has made that agreement. Guitar Man 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, SmashMouth said: If I'm being honest, I've never liked HH (shell shock from when they dominated and whipped our butt a few times), and I always felt sorry for BC until they audibled the "RED-WHITE OPT-AROUND". But since I don't consider HH to be a local team, I will root for BC. I wish somehow they both could lose, but that ain't gonna happen. We could both lose and still be ahead of the Raiders in District Standings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wo-s#1 Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said: We could both lose and still be ahead of the Raiders in District Standings. Bam…shots fired Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 19 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said: Bam…shots fired "Git DOWN!!!!!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: Districts opposing each other in 1st Rd. can agree to the top 2 seeds hosting. 9-4A DI and 10-4A DI has made that agreement. If really wish they would make it uniform across the state. BBfan061 and AggiesAreWe 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 13 minutes ago, AshlyHasBeen said: If really wish they would make it uniform across the state. I agree. I have always stated that I thought the district champ should always host the first round. Just another incentive to win district. AshlyHasBeen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmashMouth Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: We could both lose and still be ahead of the Raiders in District Standings. No doubt about that. I don’t see the relevance in that reply, but it’s true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 24 minutes ago, SmashMouth said: No doubt about that. I don’t see the relevance in that reply, but it’s true. “I wish somehow they both could lose, but that ain't gonna happen.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmashMouth Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: “I wish somehow they both could lose, but that ain't gonna happen.” Still looking for relevance counselor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, SmashMouth said: Still looking for relevance counselor. You were hating on my cards, so I had to point out the Raiders’ impotence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago Errrrrr…. Incompetence. SmashMouth 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pine curtain Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 7 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: We could both lose and still be ahead of the Raiders in District Standings. Would BC even make the playoffs if they would have stayed in the district they were suppose to be in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guitar Man Posted 2 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 19 minutes ago, pine curtain said: Would BC even made the playoffs if they would have stayed in the district they were suppose to be in? They are definitely capable of getting a close win over Jasper and Silsbee. They could be 4th or 3rd at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.