Jump to content

Huffman (26) @ Bridge City (18) - FINAL


Recommended Posts

Huffman dominated up front defensively, and did what they needed to on offense to secure the win. BCs quarterback took a lot of hits and was limping around. I thought BCs defense played well considering all the turnovers the offense committed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep up with pine tree because that’s where both my college roommates graduated from.  They’ve been very good this year, but before last year they were bad a long time.  9-1 this year with some good wins, but have played a couple of mediocre teams close.  Maybe not a blowout, but I think they beat BC comfortably, although BC probably caught a break finishing 3rd and avoiding Chapel Hill.  LCM has a shot against Lindale, but while they’re 5-5, every team they’ve lost to would probably win this district.  Vidor is probably gonna get thumped.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Right99JOH said:

What did we learn this season?!?!…. BC is avg. they beat the bad and ok teams. Lose to the good teams.

What we actually learned this season is that BC far exceeded expectations (Projected to finish 6th) and were in the running for the DC. Future looks bright for BC football. They lost to the district champion by 3 points. At the end of the day, it’s been a heck of a season and I expect them to compete their butts off against Pine Tree. Take your hating somewhere else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Guitar Man said:

What we actually learned this season is that BC far exceeded expectations (Projected to finish 6th) and were in the running for the DC. Future looks bright for BC football. They lost to the district champion by 3 points. At the end of the day, it’s been a heck of a season and I expect them to compete their butts off against Pine Tree. Take your hating somewhere else. 

You've been hating for 3 weeks. Grab your spoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Guitar Man said:

What we actually learned this season is that BC far exceeded expectations (Projected to finish 6th) and were in the running for the DC. Future looks bright for BC football. They lost to the district champion by 3 points. At the end of the day, it’s been a heck of a season and I expect them to compete their butts off against Pine Tree. Take your hating somewhere else. 

I’ll take it right here potnha… what good team did bridge chitty beat?!?!… Vidor? Buna? I’ll wait…. 
 

*future looks about as bright as the weather in SETX today 

**FYI… a loss by 3 pts or 30… it’s still an “L”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Right99JOH said:

I’ll take it right here potnha… what good team did bridge chitty beat?!?!… Vidor? Buna? I’ll wait…. 
 

*future looks about as bright as the weather in SETX today 

They finished 8-2. The two losses combined were 11 points. If BC is average. So is Huffman and so is LCM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Guitar Man said:

They finished 8-2. The two losses combined were 11 points. If BC is average. So is Huffman and so is LCM

LCM and Hh are above avg. cause BC is avg in a below avg district.

bc caught lightening in bottle. One good year in how many?!?! Again, I’ll wait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Guitar Man said:

They finished 8-2. The two losses combined were 11 points. If BC is average. So is Huffman and so is LCM

Lol huffman kneeled at the goalline. You're really gonna try to brag about how much BC "only" lost by? I guess thats the standard there not getting drug by the normal district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Right99JOH said:

LCM and Hh are above avg. cause BC is avg in a below avg district.

bc caught lightening in bottle. One good year in how many?!?! Again, I’ll wait

I've heard that statement before... bc will be fine. They'll take a huge loss with that many seniors but they have a great group of coaches over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said:

Lol huffman kneeled at the goalline. You're really gonna try to brag about how much BC "only" lost by? I guess thats the standard there not getting drug by the normal district.

They also took advantage of an interception in the end zone and muffed kick return

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said:

Lol huffman kneeled at the goalline. You're really gonna try to brag about how much BC "only" lost by? I guess thats the standard there not getting drug by the normal district.

I’m not bragging, I’m just stating the actual numbers. If BC is below avg so is LCM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Guitar Man said:

I’m not bragging, I’m just stating the actual numbers. If BC is below avg so is LCM

😂 LCM beat BC… that means LCM scored more points that BC… BC is an avg team teetering on being below avg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, setxathlete14 said:

By stating the actual numbers what are you trying to point out? Huffman Actually could've had 7 more points.

Im trying to point out that Right99JOH said that bc loses to the “good” teams. They lost to the outright district champ by 3. And despite committing 4 turnovers on offense and losing the ball on kickoff return, they were in the Huffman game till the end. I just don’t understand why yall hate so much when the margins are so small between the three. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Guitar Man said:

Im trying to point out that Right99JOH said that bc loses to the “good” teams. They lost to the outright district champ by 3. And despite committing 4 turnovers on offense and losing the ball on kickoff return, they were in the Huffman game till the end. I just don’t understand why yall hate so much when the margins are so small between the three. 

If you wanna talk about "only losing by" points in one of the worst districts in the state......Should we tally up theoretical if the opt-out never happened? Would that help you understand better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...