HF vs. LaMarque

[bullets13]

La Marque ar losers of 3 straight, and 4th place out of a very bad district.  This feels like an incoming blowout for the horns.  

[AggiesAreWe]

4 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

La Marque ar losers of 3 straight, and 4th place out of a very bad district.  This feels like an incoming blowout for the horns.  

Horns by 28+

[BBfan061]

HF can name their score… But in the second round they will have a much tougher game with the winner of Robinson/Sealy

[Separation Scientist]

I dunno why everyone wants to jump ahead past the current week. HF and all the others needs to go out and have fun and Kick Asp this week and fight next week next week. Why throw cold water on a party? 

[AggiesAreWe]

5 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

I dunno why everyone wants to jump ahead past the current week. HF and all the others needs to go out and have fun and Kick Asp this week and fight next week next week. Why throw cold water on a party? 

I agree.

[BBfan061]

26 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

I dunno why everyone wants to jump ahead past the current week. HF and all the others needs to go out and have fun and Kick Asp this week and fight next week next week. Why throw cold water on a party? 

When playing a inferior opponent I believe it’s normal to look ahead to the next round… at least to have something to talk about… No one wants to discuss how Hamshire Fannett is gonna beat the hell outta La Marque… so.. for conversation sake yeah people will look ahead to the following week lol I can assure you the people that matter ( HF coaches and players ) are focused on this week and they will have fun and kick some asp 

[AggiesAreWe]

13 minutes ago, BBfan061 said:

When playing a inferior opponent I believe it’s normal to look ahead to the next round… at least to have something to talk about… No one wants to discuss how Hamshire Fannett is gonna beat the hell outta La Marque… so.. for conversation sake yeah people will look ahead to the following week lol I can assure you the people that matter ( HF coaches and players ) are focused on this week and they will have fun and kick some asp 

That seems to be what you do on most threads. Get the talk pointed more towards your area teams.lol

[Separation Scientist]

41 minutes ago, BBfan061 said:

 No one wants to discuss how Hamshire Fannett is gonna beat the hell outta La Marque… 

They should. LM is HF's opponent this week. This should be the topic, see the title. 

This goes beyond just HF-LM. Many threads have "well they win this week but won't get past so-and-so in rd. 2 or rd. 3. 

No need for future cold water. 

[BBfan061]

Yeah and without yall nitpicking me about this there would be 2 post on this thread about this game…. But please continue on… Let me know about any other un written rules

[Separation Scientist]

Not any rules, just simply look at the thread title. Again, I am not pointing specifically at you. This goes on in many threads.

"Yeah they will win the first round but they are toast in the 2nd!"

What good does that do for anyone?    

 

 

[BBfan061]

4 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

Not any rules, just simply look at the thread title. Again, I am not pointing specifically at you. This goes on in many threads.

"Yeah they will win the first round but they are toast in the 2nd!"

What good does that do for anyone?    

 

 

All good just messing with y’all lol

[89Falcon]

1 hour ago, Separation Scientist said:

Not any rules, just simply look at the thread title. Again, I am not pointing specifically at you. This goes on in many threads.

"Yeah they will win the first round but they are toast in the 2nd!"

What good does that do for anyone?    

 

 

It does "good" for me. I enjoy conversations that aggravate "forum judiciary". Referencing opponents in the next round is a perfectly relevant addition to a playoff thread, particularly when the primary/current game is a "laugher". 

I would ask the question: "What good does it do for anyone to discuss a non-competitive matchup"? And follow it up with: "Why worry about a comment made by another poster when all you have to do is disregard the comment and not engage"?   

[Separation Scientist]

3 hours ago, 89Falcon said:

It does "good" for me. I enjoy conversations that aggravate "forum judiciary".  

So its not the teams, or their future playoff prospects. You just want to "aggravate" someone. 

Another pot stirrer. Got it. 

[89Falcon]

7 hours ago, Separation Scientist said:

So its not the teams, or their future playoff prospects. You just want to "aggravate" someone. 

Another pot stirrer. Got it. 

Glad you "got it", did you read the entire quote? Referencing opponents in the next round is a perfectly relevant addition to a playoff thread, particularly when the primary/current game is a "laugher"