Susan Smith

[baddog]

….denied parole. She should have been executed. She should at least never come up for parole. This is what is wrong with our society. Bleeding hearts wanting to give her some second chance. I think about those kids crying mommy while going under water. She heard their screams then concocted a crazy story to cover it up. They should play those screams for her to hear till the devil comes for her.

[BS Wildcats]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

….denied parole. She should have been executed. She should at least never come up for parole. This is what is wrong with our society. Bleeding hearts wanting to give her some second chance. I think about those kids crying mommy while going under water. She heard their screams then concocted a crazy story to cover it up. They should play those screams for her to hear till the devil comes for her.

Just as Ibarra should be

[CardinalBacker]

Hypocritical is crying that abortion stops a beating heart while demanding the murder of another human being. 

 

And vice versa.

Me?  I'm pro-life... unborn children AND convicted criminals.  The part no one wants to recognize is that it cost a lot less money to house/clothe/feed Susan Smith for 40 years that it would cost to fund her appeals of a death sentence.  I'm also anti-wasteful spending.  

 

[LumRaiderFan]

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Hypocritical is crying that abortion stops a beating heart while demanding the murder of another human being. 

 

And vice versa.

Me?  I'm pro-life... unborn children AND convicted criminals.  The part no one wants to recognize is that it cost a lot less money to house/clothe/feed Susan Smith for 40 years that it would cost to fund her appeals of a death sentence.  I'm also anti-wasteful spending.  

 

Nothing hypocritical at all about that opinion.

[baddog]

Who said she is a human being?

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Hypocritical is crying that abortion stops a beating heart while demanding the murder of another human being. 

How you can compare ending a life of an innocent baby to that of a convicted criminal, who admitted she drowned them is beyond me....

[BS Wildcats]

31 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

How you can compare ending a life of an innocent baby to that of a convicted criminal, who admitted she drowned them is beyond me....

The liberal mindset.  And, he wants us to believe that he is a conservative.

[5GallonBucket]

It really doesn’t have to cost that much….we ve complicated things.

[tvc184]

2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

How you can compare ending a life of an innocent baby to that of a convicted criminal, who admitted she drowned them is beyond me....

Everyone understands the difference and knows there is no comparison.

Some conveniently ignore the obvious. 

[Big girl]

On 11/20/2024 at 3:30 PM, baddog said:

….denied parole. She should have been executed. She should at least never come up for parole. This is what is wrong with our society. Bleeding hearts wanting to give her some second chance. I think about those kids crying mommy while going under water. She heard their screams then concocted a crazy story to cover it up. They should play those screams for her to hear till the devil comes for her.

I thought you were pro life

[Big girl]

11 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Hypocritical is crying that abortion stops a beating heart while demanding the murder of another human being. 

 

And vice versa.

Me?  I'm pro-life... unborn children AND convicted criminals.  The part no one wants to recognize is that it cost a lot less money to house/clothe/feed Susan Smith for 40 years that it would cost to fund her appeals of a death sentence.  I'm also anti-wasteful spending.  

 

I agree. Either you are pro-life or you are not

[baddog]

5 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I thought you were pro life

I thought you weren’t going to respond to my post anymore. Promises, promises…..

Don’t play your little game of mincing words. Look at Hippy’s and TVC’s posts above. There is no comparison.

[tvc184]

14 minutes ago, Big girl said:

I agree. Either you are pro-life or you are not

So you have deemed what peoples’ limitations are?

I am pro life of innocent unborn children.

I am pro death penalty for heinous murderers who have been convicted and appealed their verdict.

 There is no either/or to it. 

 

[CardinalBacker]

8 hours ago, tvc184 said:

So you have deemed what peoples’ limitations are?

I am pro life of innocent unborn children.

I am pro death penalty for heinous murderers who have been convicted and appealed their verdict.

 There is no either/or to it. 

 

So  “thou shall not kill” applies to helpless unborns, but not to men handcuffed to gurneys decades after whatever crime they committed. 
 

Makes sense to me.  
 

 

[mat]

22 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Hypocritical is crying that abortion stops a beating heart while demanding the murder of another human being. 

 

And vice versa.

Me?  I'm pro-life... unborn children AND convicted criminals.  The part no one wants to recognize is that it cost a lot less money to house/clothe/feed Susan Smith for 40 years that it would cost to fund her appeals of a death sentence.  I'm also anti-wasteful spending.  

 

So you’re saying we need to reform our appeal process?🤔

[Big girl]

12 hours ago, baddog said:

I thought you weren’t going to respond to my post anymore. Promises, promises…..

Don’t play your little game of mincing words. Look at Hippy’s and TVC’s posts above. There is no comparison.

A life is being taken in both instances.

[Big girl]

11 hours ago, tvc184 said:

So you have deemed what peoples’ limitations are?

I am pro life of innocent unborn children.

I am pro death penalty for heinous murderers who have been convicted and appealed their verdict.

 There is no either/or to it. 

 

Say that then. Don't just stop at i am pro-life. Thanks for the clarification.

[baddog]

3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

So  “thou shall not kill” applies to helpless unborns, but not to men handcuffed to gurneys decades after whatever crime they committed. 
 

Makes sense to me.  
 

 

So you want to spare the life of a heinous murderer while taking the life of an unborn is ok. Makes sense to me.

[CardinalBacker]

9 minutes ago, baddog said:

So you want to spare the life of a heinous murderer while taking the life of an unborn is ok. Makes sense to me.

It's called reading comprehension.  

 

I against abortion and capital punishment.  It's way cheaper to just let a murderer rot in a cell to have them executed just to win the votes of bitter old white dudes who would never have the intestinal fortitude to work in a prison, much less flip the switch on a human. 

[baddog]

South Carolina does have the death penalty so Smith is very lucky. I can’t think of a more monstrous crime than to watch your two kids drown while screaming mommy.

[5GallonBucket]

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

It's called reading comprehension.  

 

I against abortion and capital punishment.  It's way cheaper to just let a murderer rot in a cell to have them executed just to win the votes of bitter old white dudes who would never have the intestinal fortitude to work in a prison, much less flip the switch on a human. 

Doesn’t have to be

[baddog]

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

It's called reading comprehension.  

 

I against abortion and capital punishment.  It's way cheaper to just let a murderer rot in a cell to have them executed just to win the votes of bitter old white dudes who would never have the intestinal fortitude to work in a prison, much less flip the switch on a human. 

Well, there’s ONE. Most liberals have no problem with abortion but will scream to spare the life of a criminal. That sounds pretty demented to me. In fact, perfectly backwards to everything I believe. What elde is new?