thetragichippy Posted Thursday at 04:31 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 04:31 PM It's been overturned due to a technicality, but his name will stay with the likes of Millie Vanilliš Ā This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted Thursday at 08:43 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 08:43 PM Illinoisā¦ā¦no surprise here. Too bad for āJuicyā. Fellas like him have fun in prison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM His verdict was not overturned on evidence.Ā The unethical prosecutor, whose decision itself was overturned, was allowed to stand. Ā Here is an example. A guy crossed the street and commited jaywalking. A guy driving a car had to swerve to miss the guy who was jaywalking. After getting in an argument, the driver attempted to drive away and the guy who jaywalked shoots and kills him in basically a road rage incident. He was arrested for murder Ā For political reasons, the prosecutor tells the jaywalker, if you plead guilty to the pedestrian traffic charge, we will drop the murder charge. Ā Naturally, he agreed, knowing that heās been given a gift for appearance. Another prosecutor cameĀ along and asked on appeal to reinstate the murder charges. An appeals court agreed saying that there is an ample evidence for such a charge. They went to trial and the prosecution was able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that murder was committed. In steps to state Supreme Court. While it is obvious that all of the evidence was valid and itās obviously that the murder was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because the special prosecutor allowed the murder suspect to plead guilty to a traffic ticket, he canāt be charged again for murder under double Jeopardy. Ā Big girl 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 13 hours ago, tvc184 said: His verdict was not overturned on evidence.Ā The unethical prosecutor, whose decision itself was overturned, was allowed to stand. Ā Here is an example. A guy crossed the street and commited jaywalking. A guy driving a car had to swerve to miss the guy who was jaywalking. After getting in an argument, the driver attempted to drive away and the guy who jaywalked shoots and kills him in basically a road rage incident. He was arrested for murder Ā For political reasons, the prosecutor tells the jaywalker, if you plead guilty to the pedestrian traffic charge, we will drop the murder charge. Ā Naturally, he agreed, knowing that heās been given a gift for appearance. Another prosecutor cameĀ along and asked on appeal to reinstate the murder charges. An appeals court agreed saying that there is an ample evidence for such a charge. They went to trial and the prosecution was able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that murder was committed. In steps to state Supreme Court. While it is obvious that all of the evidence was valid and itās obviously that the murder was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because the special prosecutor allowed the murder suspect to plead guilty to a traffic ticket, he canāt be charged again for murder under double Jeopardy. Ā Thanks for the explanation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 23 hours ago, baddog said: Illinoisā¦ā¦no surprise here. Too bad for āJuicyā. Fellas like him have fun in prison. You disgust me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Big girl said: You disgust me. Mission accomplished. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.