Jump to content

Juicy Smollett conviction overturned by Illinois Supreme Court


thetragichippy

Recommended Posts

His verdict was not overturned on evidence.Ā 

The unethical prosecutor, whose decision itself was overturned, was allowed to stand.

Ā Here is an example.

A guy crossed the street and commited jaywalking. A guy driving a car had to swerve to miss the guy who was jaywalking.

After getting in an argument, the driver attempted to drive away and the guy who jaywalked shoots and kills him in basically a road rage incident. He was arrested for murder Ā 

For political reasons, the prosecutor tells the jaywalker, if you plead guilty to the pedestrian traffic charge, we will drop the murder charge. Ā Naturally, he agreed, knowing that heā€™s been given a gift for appearance.

Another prosecutor cameĀ along and asked on appeal to reinstate the murder charges. An appeals court agreed saying that there is an ample evidence for such a charge. They went to trial and the prosecution was able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that murder was committed.

In steps to state Supreme Court. While it is obvious that all of the evidence was valid and itā€™s obviously that the murder was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because the special prosecutor allowed the murder suspect to plead guilty to a traffic ticket, he canā€™t be charged again for murder under double Jeopardy.

Ā 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, tvc184 said:

His verdict was not overturned on evidence.Ā 

The unethical prosecutor, whose decision itself was overturned, was allowed to stand.

Ā Here is an example.

A guy crossed the street and commited jaywalking. A guy driving a car had to swerve to miss the guy who was jaywalking.

After getting in an argument, the driver attempted to drive away and the guy who jaywalked shoots and kills him in basically a road rage incident. He was arrested for murder Ā 

For political reasons, the prosecutor tells the jaywalker, if you plead guilty to the pedestrian traffic charge, we will drop the murder charge. Ā Naturally, he agreed, knowing that heā€™s been given a gift for appearance.

Another prosecutor cameĀ along and asked on appeal to reinstate the murder charges. An appeals court agreed saying that there is an ample evidence for such a charge. They went to trial and the prosecution was able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that murder was committed.

In steps to state Supreme Court. While it is obvious that all of the evidence was valid and itā€™s obviously that the murder was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because the special prosecutor allowed the murder suspect to plead guilty to a traffic ticket, he canā€™t be charged again for murder under double Jeopardy.

Ā 

Thanks for the explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,203
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    bfr_341-
    Newest Member
    bfr_341-
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...