Daniel Perry - NOT GUILTY

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

In this case the guy absolutely and without question choked the "victim" until he was dead.  But he gets a walk.  

You need to read up on the case. He absolutely, without question did not choke the victim until he was dead.......When ambulance arrived he had a pulse. 

If he walks in a liberal city like New York, the state had no case

 

[SmashMouth]

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

He's not a billionaire, so he won't get a spot in the Cabinet. 

Good point. I think he'd make an exception just to tee off the woke left though. Lol.

[baddog]

I remember The Texas Tower Sniper, Charles Whitman killing 17 people in 1966. The two officers, who finally gained access to the floor where Whitman was and gunned him down, there were those who claimed the officers used excessive deadly force. In actuality, they were hailed as heroes. I was 13 years old at the time and I was so glad Whitman was dead. We had watched the carnage on tv. 

I guess Neely should have been left alone so he could kill several people and everyone would be happy. Well, you would have those who would say why didn’t anyone do anything.

You can’t please all of the people all of the time.

[Reagan]

It’s my understanding that the charges were actually brought by Alvin “the devil” Bragg.  
I heard today that Pam Bondi will/might use the Civil Rights section of the DOJ to launch an investigation into the devil Bragg!  I say, go for it!  It’s time to start holding evil accountable!

[baddog]

 

[tvc184]

Here is an interesting take on this case.

We all should know that no matter the facts of a case, it sometimes depends on the laws in that particular state and in that particular jurisdiction.

I often see arguments in various forums, including this one, where an incident in Oklahoma will be compared to a similar one in New Jersey. It usually can’t be done because it is different laws prosecuted by a different jurisdictions. 

 This video is about a self defense case on a train where an unarmed person was killed. In this case the deceased made no threats to kill anyone like in the Penny case. The man who claimed self defense in this case, killed an unarmed guy who not making any death threats. He did so by stabbing with an illegal knife. Yep, the killer brought maybe a 6” blade knife onto a train where city ordinance only allowed a 4” knife.

Why was the guy stabbed to death? Because he slapped a woman.

Even in Texas where self defense is a bit more open, a deadly force self defense requires a “reasonable belief” that it is to stop deadly force. Imagine if school kids could lawfully kill each other if one slapped the other at school. You gave me a bloody nose so I can lawfully kill you?

Both the Penny case and the case in this video were 6 weeks apart and…. both in New York City. That’s right folks, both were on a subway in NYC in the summer of 2023  

 The guy who brought the illegal knife onto the train, stabbed a guy to death for a slap. The DA investigated and presented a case to the grand jury which resulted in no charges filed. This was 6 weeks AFTER the Penny case where Penny used no deadly weapon to subdue a guy who threatened to kill people and the man making threats said that he didn’t care if he spent life in prison. Seems like a credible threat? 

So what if the difference between a guy killing an unarmed guy with a deadly weapon for a slap and a guy that used only physical force to stop a person making death threats…. in the same city and only 6 weeks difference? 

The guy who brought the illegal knife onto the train and killed the unarmed guy for a slap, was Black.

So in the same city at almost the same time where an “unarmed person” was killed on a subway in both cases, one was killed with an illegal weapon for a slap and the other was killed only with physical force of holding on after the deceased threatening to kill several people. Who would seem more likely to be prosecuted? Oh, the unarmed White guy.

Any questions about political prosecutions in NYC? 

 

 

[tvc184]

On a side note, am I angry that the guy defended his girlfriend from a slap with deadly force? No.

Am I angry that he brought a 6” knife with him? No. In Texas there is no such restriction but like always, different states have different laws. This guy was likely committing a crime of carrying a deadly weapon onto a subway, but I don’t blame him.

[baddog]

That video proves that it all comes down to the race baiters. CNN shouldn’t be on the air with their lies. Notice the truth comes from Fox. 

[SmashMouth]

4 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Any questions about political prosecutions in NYC?

No doubt...

[baddog]

5 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Here is an interesting take on this case.

We all should know that no matter the facts of a case, it sometimes depends on the laws in that particular state and in that particular jurisdiction.

I often see arguments in various forums, including this one, where an incident in Oklahoma will be compared to a similar one in New Jersey. It usually can’t be done because it is different laws prosecuted by a different jurisdictions. 

 This video is about a self defense case on a train where an unarmed person was killed. In this case the deceased made no threats to kill anyone like in the Penny case. The man who claimed self defense in this case, killed an unarmed guy who not making any death threats. He did so by stabbing with an illegal knife. Yep, the killer brought maybe a 6” blade knife onto a train where city ordinance only allowed a 4” knife.

Why was the guy stabbed to death? Because he slapped a woman.

Even in Texas where self defense is a bit more open, a deadly force self defense requires a “reasonable belief” that it is to stop deadly force. Imagine if school kids could lawfully kill each other if one slapped the other at school. You gave me a bloody nose so I can lawfully kill you?

Both the Penny case and the case in this video were 6 weeks apart and…. both in New York City. That’s right folks, both were on a subway in NYC in the summer of 2023  

 The guy who brought the illegal knife onto the train, stabbed a guy to death for a slap. The DA investigated and presented a case to the grand jury which resulted in no charges filed. This was 6 weeks AFTER the Penny case where Penny used no deadly weapon to subdue a guy who threatened to kill people and the man making threats said that he didn’t care if he spent life in prison. Seems like a credible threat? 

So what if the difference between a guy killing an unarmed guy with a deadly weapon for a slap and a guy that used only physical force to stop a person making death threats…. in the same city and only 6 weeks difference? 

The guy who brought the illegal knife onto the train and killed the unarmed guy for a slap, was Black.

So in the same city at almost the same time where an “unarmed person” was killed on a subway in both cases, one was killed with an illegal weapon for a slap and the other was killed only with physical force of holding on after the deceased threatening to kill several people. Who would seem more likely to be prosecuted? Oh, the unarmed White guy.

Any questions about political prosecutions in NYC? 

 

 

In an earlier post, I said if the situation was reversed, he would get a slap on the wrist. Thanks for that fantastic video.

[Reagan]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up