Coach_Izzy Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 36 minutes ago, SmashMouth said: In your opinion, and you have knowledge, what schools are possibly recruiting? Just your opinion...which ones? I’ve never once accused any schools of recruiting…I know first hand that schools who have a ton of success in recent years don’t have to recruit! Kids are fickle & will flock to these programs because they want to win, get exposure at the highest level & get recruited at the highest level. There’s only a hand full of programs that are doing this consistently so it’s no secret why they have the most talent…this ain’t rocket science. NS had major flaws on both sides of the ball this year…if they were out recruiting you think they wouldn’t have brought in players to fill those voids? Quote
SmashMouth Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said: I’ve never once accused any schools of recruiting…I know first hand that schools who have a ton of success in recent years don’t have to recruit! Kids are fickle & will flock to these programs because they want to win, get exposure at the highest level & get recruited at the highest level. There’s only a hand full of programs that are doing this consistently so it’s no secret why they have the most talent…this ain’t rocket science. NS had major flaws on both sides of the ball this year…if they were out recruiting you think they wouldn’t have brought in players to fill those voids? So is it your opinion that almost no schools recruit? And I'm just asking, cuz I have no idea. Quote
OlDawg Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said: I’ve never once accused any schools of recruiting…I know first hand that schools who have a ton of success in recent years don’t have to recruit! Kids are fickle & will flock to these programs because they want to win, get exposure at the highest level & get recruited at the highest level. There’s only a hand full of programs that are doing this consistently so it’s no secret why they have the most talent…this ain’t rocket science. NS had major flaws on both sides of the ball this year…if they were out recruiting you think they wouldn’t have brought in players to fill those voids? I believe NS had a major microscope on their program due to recruiting violations that were caught. Seriously doubt if they’d be doing much right away. They’re the Astros of TXHSFB. An example. Quote
SmashMouth Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago I'm of the weak opinion, (weak, because I only have opinions of coaches to back it up & not facts) that recruiting (a violation) is much less prevalent than athletes transferring on their own to a better suited school for athletic purposes (also a violation). None of it is acceptable to me, but I understand why people do it. WOSdrummer99 1 Quote
Right99JOH Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Maybe this has already been said but one of the biggest narratives is MOMMY and DADDY.... $$'s-N-The-👁️'s Quote
Right99JOH Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Ladies & Gents.... Coach Izzy is the only person on this site who is never wrong!... THS99, Lamar1996 and CS. 1 2 Quote
Separation Scientist Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: Pretty sure starting next year the "brother in law" DEC meetings will cease because a UIL official will be in those meetings per the new regs. THIS is the biggest first step that will make a real difference. Its about time! Quote
Coach_Izzy Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, OlDawg said: I believe NS had a major microscope on their program due to recruiting violations that were caught. Seriously doubt if they’d be doing much right away. They’re the Astros of TXHSFB. An example. And yet they still gotta 4 star WR (Farrakhan) to transfer in after this happened…was he recruited? Or did his Dad want his son playing at NS? Lol Quote
oldschool2 Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 3 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: Under UIL policy, in order to participate in UIL activities, one has to establish residency within the school district one is attending or one will be ineligible for a calendar year. Also, the DEC can rule ineligible if moved for athletic purposes. This is regardless of open or closed enrollment schools. Some are talking about moving for better opportunities. It's hard to validate that move when one moves from a school that has an A rating from TEA to a school with a D or F rating. Unless the parents moved for work or it was a negative family situation, those kind of moves are obviously for athletic purposes and the student should be rules ineligible. These new policies and regulations that UIL has just come out with will crack down on some of this mass transfer situation. (i.e. Duncanville girls basketball). It won't stop it completely, but having 10-15 transfers per year will cause major red flags to the UIL and they will step in DEC meetings. Pretty sure starting next year the "brother in law" DEC meetings will cease because a UIL official will be in those meetings per the new regs. Here's where the issue is going to be. Actually.. just one of the issues. What if the parents buy a house in that district because it was more affordable? Or better living conditions? You already mentioned work. What if they didn't get along with a teacher / school employee / other students ? I'm playing devil's advocate here and I'm telling you that if a family uproots and moves, UIL better be careful determining why or why not that happened. "I know your dad took a job in Northshore, and y'all sold your house, and hired a moving company, and bought a house in Northshore, but your son's previous school has a way better academic rating so you guys obviously did all that for athletic purposes." I'm just saying... slippery slope. Quote
Coach_Izzy Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, SmashMouth said: So is it your opinion that almost no schools recruit? And I'm just asking, cuz I have no idea. You missed the part where I said “I know first hand” NS is one of the programs that constantly gets accused of recruiting on this site & I know from experience that doesn’t happen. It ain’t rocket science why the same schools get all the talent…you think it’s because they have the best recruiters on staff? Lol Quote
Coach_Izzy Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 5 minutes ago, oldschool2 said: Here's where the issue is going to be. Actually.. just one of the issues. What if the parents buy a house in that district because it was more affordable? Or better living conditions? You already mentioned work. What if they didn't get along with a teacher / school employee / other students ? I'm playing devil's advocate here and I'm telling you that if a family uproots and moves, UIL better be careful determining why or why not that happened. "I know your dad took a job in Northshore, and y'all sold your house, and bought a house in Northshore, but your son's previous school has a way better academic rating so you guys obviously did all that for athletic purposes." I'm just saying... slippery slope. Those news rules won’t stop a thing…promise you lol the rich will continue to get richer! Quote
oldschool2 Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Coach_Izzy said: Those news rules won’t stop a thing…promise you lol the rich will continue to get richer! I really think that relocation is the equalizer. Physically moving.. changing your family's permanent address. Change of employment. How is the state going to tell a student/family that the only reason they did that was for athletic benefit. Even if it was.. if it's verbally said and signed that it wasn't, then that's it. A parent can simply say that they couldn't afford to live in their previous location. Which may be true. Using a secondary address... "living" with a relative... sure. Red flags. Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote
SmashMouth Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, Coach_Izzy said: You missed the part where I said “I know first hand” NS is one of the programs that constantly gets accused of recruiting on this site & I know from experience that doesn’t happen. It ain’t rocket science why the same schools get all the talent…you think it’s because they have the best recruiters on staff? Lol Not according to the UIL... bullets13 1 Quote
CardinalBacker Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 15 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said: I feel what your saying and understand the situations faced by people of all races. But with the risk of starting to sound like CB. This is not always the case. For those using it as an excuse. Please stop. You are only handicaping yourself and others with the belief that this will always be the ways it is. I see it first hand here in my hometown. Kids not getting scholarships anymore. And unconfirmed rumors of what they are now doing at school breaks my heart. Or even others that had the chance to get out but couldn't put away their childish ways at the next level. Next thing you know they're back in the Fruit robbing a store at gunpoint. Yep it's bad and getting worse round here. The kids need us to step up. Need those role models back in front of them on a daily basis. Not friends. Sorry to veer off topic Let's be honest... kids who are transferring around in high school TYPICALLY aren't going to college to get a degree. They're heading there for an NIL deal and then a mega deal after they play out their rookie deal in the pros. Education is the LAST thing on their mind. But statistically speaking, they'll likely never finish a degree plan or DEFINITELY never make the pros. So why are people selling them a lie? At that point you have to ask "what's the point of going to college if you're going to be unsuccessful academically, then never make the pros?" You're just setting kids up for failure in life just so that your favorite high school team can get a few more wins. That's how kids end up back in their hometowns in trouble with the law. That's my problem with society in general. One community says "have fun... when it's over you can join the military, hop on that Hazelwood and get moving in life. Or hold down a part time job, take out some loans, further your education and get a semi-white collar job. Heck, go learn a trade and make decent money... you can have a good life-it's all up to you." So kids do. Another community says "the only way you're gonna make it out of here is by balling out or dropping a fire mix-tape." Which doesn't happen, except when the stars completely align. When a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of kids actually do manage to earn a living as an athlete, why do we sell that pipe dream to everybody? I doubt that a single kid from PNG over the last two years ever plays a snap of pro ball. I'd bet that MAYBE two kids from SOC in the same era will ever play a snap of pro ball. So was it worth it? Quote
Lamar1996 Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up CS. and LHJJ05 2 Quote
Boyz N Da Hood Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago SOC got some folks upset! No point in sugarcoating it... this topic was mute last year Coach_Izzy and Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 1 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said: SOC got some folks upset! No point in sugarcoating it... this topic was mute last year I agree. This has been an issue for many, many years. I can see someone seeing this as sour grapes. Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote
89Falcon Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 4 hours ago, Coach_Izzy said: You missed the part where I said “I know first hand” NS is one of the programs that constantly gets accused of recruiting on this site & I know from experience that doesn’t happen. It ain’t rocket science why the same schools get all the talent…you think it’s because they have the best recruiters on staff? Lol Did NS have a coach receive a "multi-year ban" for recruiting? bullets13 1 Quote
CardinalBacker Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 54 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: I agree. This has been an issue for many, many years. I can see someone seeing this as sour grapes. I wouldn’t expect Silsbee to have a problem with it. 🙄 Quote
bullets13 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 57 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: I agree. This has been an issue for many, many years. I can see someone seeing this as sour grapes. To be fair, silsbee fans were all over the internet and Facebook griping about the same thing after losing to faith family. And as someone who supports them because they’re local, I was right there with them. It’s hard to blame PNG fans for their sour grapes, although they weren’t winning state this year anyway. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: I wouldn’t expect Silsbee to have a problem with it. 🙄 I have a problem with mass transfers and the DEC's not doing their jobs correctly. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 1 minute ago, bullets13 said: To be fair, silsbee fans were all over the internet and Facebook griping about the same thing after losing to faith family. And as someone who supports them because they’re local, I was right there with them. It’s hard to blame PNG fans for their sour grapes, although they weren’t winning state this year anyway. The complaining about Faith Family has been going on for many years by many people. Didn't just start last season with Silsbee folks. I actually think that's a different topic all together. I also think some sour grapes were involved with Silsbee folks last year. Quote
bullets13 Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 14 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: The complaining about Faith Family has been going on for many years by many people. Didn't just start last season with Silsbee folks. I actually think that's a different topic all together. I also think some sour grapes were involved with Silsbee folks last year. I guess my point is sometimes things aren’t as big of a deal until they affect you directly navydawg31 and LumRaiderFan 2 Quote
Coach_Izzy Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 4 hours ago, SmashMouth said: Not according to the UIL... 1 hour ago, 89Falcon said: Did NS have a coach receive a "multi-year ban" for recruiting? A coach who hadn’t been employed at NS for even a full year & was running an outside recruiting service on his own. NS has been dominating for 20+ years and never got hit with a recruiting violation lol please stop reaching. Quote
Coach_Izzy Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, Boyz N Da Hood said: SOC got some folks upset! No point in sugarcoating it... this topic was mute last year Bingo Boyz N Da Hood and CS. 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.