baddog Posted January 12 Report Posted January 12 Can anyone imagine the new regulations/codes they will come up with for the rebuilds? Slate roofs only, no natural gas, solar power and wind mills….etc…. All of the vegetation has been burned off. California already has hill/mud slide issues. When it rains, it’s going to be a huge mess. Quote
mat Posted January 12 Report Posted January 12 5 hours ago, baddog said: Can anyone imagine the new regulations/codes they will come up with for the rebuilds? Slate roofs only, no natural gas, solar power and wind mills….etc…. All of the vegetation has been burned off. California already has hill/mud slide issues. When it rains, it’s going to be a huge mess. They will loosen the regs for the rebuild Quote
Reagan Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 46 minutes ago, mat said: They will loosen the regs for the rebuild You are giving the commies a lot of credit for being rational. Remember their mantra: Never let a good crisis go to waste! So… Quote
baddog Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 hour ago, mat said: They will loosen the regs for the rebuild Hopefully you’re right. Rebuilding in a spot where the views have been wiped away……I guess it will happen. I won’t live to see it. Quote
tvc184 Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 Anyone watch the video of the Los Angeles Assistant Fire Chief saying that if a person responds to your emergency, you want someone who looks like you? This premise she claims is based on if we look the same, the firefighter would better understand your situation. What situation? Let’s see, a heterosexual White male firefighter finds a woman in a burning house who is suffering smoke inhalation and at risk of death. But wait? Is she a race other than White? What are her pronouns? Is she actually a born female or a transgender female? How long should the male firefighter question her before he can tell if he understands her situation? “I realize that you are at risk of death but I really need to understand your situation”. When answering a follow up situation that the Assistant Fire Chief brought up about whether a woman firefighter could drag a person out of a burning building, her response was, “He got himself in the wrong place if I have to carry him out of a fire”. I wonder if the police could use the same rationale? Maybe the police could say, we realize that you are a victim of a violent assault but before we can assist you, are you concerned that we have a different ethnicity or our pronouns are different? Also note that you should not have gotten yourself into the situation where you were assaulted! So by the Assistant Fire Chief’s own words, the ability to do the job physically is not important. It is knowing and understanding that people being rescued (or perhaps a weak and failed attempt at a rescue) are concerned if the person saving his/her life either looks the same or has the same lifestyle. Heck, maybe a straight Black woman would reject having her life saved if the only rescuer was a transgender male. DEI at its finest….. 😳 Reagan and thetragichippy 2 Quote
thetragichippy Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 3 minutes ago, tvc184 said: that if a person responds to your emergency, you want someone who looks like you? The 8 years I worked for the ambulance service, no one I ever "rescued" or rushed to the hospital cared about anything but them getting help.....lol The amount of word play about this enter disaster is ridiculous. tvc184 1 Quote
baddog Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 I think all of this was planned. Mayor Karen Bass is a marxist. Newsom is known to suck up to China….city cleanup/Covid masks…Neither show any real concern for the people. Call me crazy, but the setup for failure is real and obvious. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.