Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No, it’s mutually beneficial.

Looking at just a couple of NATO members, their contributions seems to match their GDP.

An example the US uses 3.4% of its GDP for NATO but Poland spends 3.9%. Poland is spending 15% more of their money on NATO than the US. Estonia is spending 3.4%, Latvia 3.2% and Greece who just went through a financial crisis is at 3.1%.

It would be like complaining that people in Texas with 30,000,000 people pay more total in  federal income taxes compared to people in Wyoming with 600,000 people. When you are 50 times bigger, it stands to reason that you will pay roughly 50 times more income tax total.

 Not counting just NATO but the total US defense spending is larger than (I think) the next 10 largest militaries…. Combined!

That’s not only NATO but involves India, China and Russia, who are not part of that organization.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,258
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ryanbland55
    Newest Member
    Ryanbland55
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...