purple reign Posted Wednesday at 12:31 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 12:31 AM With ADM's having been released on TEA site taken last fall between UIL accounting years, it looks like both Richmond Randle from 5A-D2, the state champion, and Dulles dropping down from 6A will have to find a new home in 5A-D1. What district gets them? Dulles this year had 2165 and Randle 1966 and growing fast. Other Adm's for 5AD1 in region 3 follow: 9-5AD1: Baytown Sterling 2150 B. United 2035 B. West Brook 2213 Galveston Ball 1905 Lufkin 2026 Barbers Hill 2222 P.A. Memorial 2140 10-5AD1 Galena Park 1815 H. Austin 1181 H. Madison 1588 H. Milby 2126 H. Sharpstown 1689 H. Waldrip 1615 H.Westbury 2263 H. Spring Woods 2020 11-5AD1: Angleton 2025 Crosby 2148 FB Kempner 1850 Friendswood 2014 Kwood Park 1884 La Porte 2090 NC Porter 2094 Pasadena 2217 12-5AD1: A. Anderson 2223 Bastrop Ceder Creek 2144 Buda Hays 2304 College Station 2226 CS A & M Cons 2166 Kyle Lehman 2128 Lockhart 2006 PF. Hendrickson 2128 Pf.Weiss 1985 Quote
Matthew328 Posted Wednesday at 02:17 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 02:17 AM Dulles is FBISD so they have to go where Kempner goes....Randle is so close to FBISD they'd probably follow wherever the 2 FBISD schools go Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted Wednesday at 02:24 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 02:24 AM Would make sense to me if Randle and Dulles were in 11-5AD1, move Crosby or La Porte to 9-5AD1. Goslin 1 Quote
purple reign Posted Wednesday at 03:26 AM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 03:26 AM 1 hour ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said: Would make sense to me if Randle and Dulles were in 11-5AD1, move Crosby or La Porte to 9-5AD1. Or La Porte and Pasadena. That way you would have the 3 ship channel area schools together. Barbers Hill may go to 6A this time if they have another year of growth like this year and that would leave 2 openings in 9-5Ad1. Goslin and Mr. Buddy Garrity 2 Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted Wednesday at 03:38 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 03:38 AM 9 minutes ago, purple reign said: Or La Porte and Pasadena. That way you would have the 3 ship channel area schools together. Barbers Hill may go to 6A this time if they have another year of growth like this year and that would leave 2 openings in 9-5Ad1. Ahhhhh, I forgot all about BH potentially being 6A. Sidenote: I'm banking on Lufkin staying put. Goslin 1 Quote
Goslin Posted Wednesday at 10:39 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 10:39 AM When you’re talking 9-5A-D1, remember also that GCCISD is rezoning this summer. GCM might be dropping back down from 23-6A if they can get the numbers low enough. They’d surely want back into 9-5A-1 with RSS. REL in 9-5A-2 in-District with Randle right now would probably like to be able to play up in 9-5A-1 again as well since RSS and GCM were the 2 teams they always beat there, (I actually think REL is doing just fine where they are but that’s just me). There’s gonna be a lot of movement in ‘26. Quote
purple reign Posted Wednesday at 02:22 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 02:22 PM Another thing to consider is FB Kempner reported 1850 and Kingwood Park 1884, that's below the current cutoff for D1 of 1903 Goslin 1 Quote
purple reign Posted Wednesday at 03:57 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 03:57 PM 5 hours ago, Goslin said: When you’re talking 9-5A-D1, remember also that GCCISD is rezoning this summer. GCM might be dropping back down from 23-6A if they can get the numbers low enough. They’d surely want back into 9-5A-1 with RSS. REL in 9-5A-2 in-District with Randle right now would probably like to be able to play up in 9-5A-1 again as well since RSS and GCM were the 2 teams they always beat there, (I actually think REL is doing just fine where they are but that’s just me). There’s gonna be a lot of movement in ‘26. Changes don't look too radical to me, if you're talking about area. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Goslin 1 Quote
Goslin Posted Wednesday at 04:23 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 04:23 PM 1 hour ago, purple reign said: Changes don't look too radical to me, if you're talking about area. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up They’re not too radical for the High Schools but supposedly they’re trying to reduce GCM’s enrollment around 700 students. RSS would see a 500 student increase and REL around 200. Of course this doesn’t take into account many incoming 9th graders choosing their campus through the various academies. At the Feb Board meeting the question was asked whether or not this rezone would drop GCM down for sure and they didn’t answer that question, just saying that there are other things they can do as well like moving programs around to get that enrollment number down but that even if GCM drops down in ‘26 they’ll be back up permanently in ‘28 or ‘30 at the latest. Long story short, they want to drop GCM down in ‘26 and think they can do it but no guarantees and if they CAN do it, it’ll only last 2-4 years before they’re back in 6A to stay. If that’s the case I say leave them where they are and let them learn to live with it but it’s not up to me. It’s a lot more radical at the elementary and Jr school level. Some Junior Schools have fed into multiple High Schools for a while now. After this, each High School will have 2 Jr Schools which feed exclusively into them. At the Elementary level they’re closing Lamar Elementary and splitting its students between Carver and Ashbel Smith. It isn’t over after this rezone, either. GCCISD is going into year 3 of cuts in ‘25-‘26 and they said at the last meeting that the year after that ‘26-‘27 will be a cut year as well and that’s without taking into account what the Legislature is going to do as far as funding/Vouchers/etc. Quote
purple reign Posted Wednesday at 05:35 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 05:35 PM 1 hour ago, Goslin said: They’re not too radical for the High Schools but supposedly they’re trying to reduce GCM’s enrollment around 700 students. RSS would see a 500 student increase and REL around 200. Of course this doesn’t take into account many incoming 9th graders choosing their campus through the various academies. At the Feb Board meeting the question was asked whether or not this rezone would drop GCM down for sure and they didn’t answer that question, just saying that there are other things they can do as well like moving programs around to get that enrollment number down but that even if GCM drops down in ‘26 they’ll be back up permanently in ‘28 or ‘30 at the latest. Long story short, they want to drop GCM down in ‘26 and think they can do it but no guarantees and if they CAN do it, it’ll only last 2-4 years before they’re back in 6A to stay. If that’s the case I say leave them where they are and let them learn to live with it but it’s not up to me. It’s a lot more radical at the elementary and Jr school level. Some Junior Schools have fed into multiple High Schools for a while now. After this, each High School will have 2 Jr Schools which feed exclusively into them. At the Elementary level they’re closing Lamar Elementary and splitting its students between Carver and Ashbel Smith. It isn’t over after this rezone, either. GCCISD is going into year 3 of cuts in ‘25-‘26 and they said at the last meeting that the year after that ‘26-‘27 will be a cut year as well and that’s without taking into account what the Legislature is going to do as far as funding/Vouchers/etc. Under this change GCM would become a 5AD2 school, Lee would probably become 5AD1, and Sterling a 6A using the numbers you supplied. Quote
Goslin Posted Thursday at 12:31 AM Report Posted Thursday at 12:31 AM 6 hours ago, purple reign said: Under this change GCM would become a 5AD2 school, Lee would probably become 5AD1, and Sterling a 6A using the numbers you supplied. Likely, but that’s IF those numbers end up being close to that. These are the numbers GCCISD put out there BUT like I said, when they were asked point-blank at their February Board meeting if these numbers were accurate and if GCM was for sure going to be under the 6A threshold they wouldn’t answer either way. It’s a mess and we probably won’t know for sure which way GCM or any other GCCISD school is going until after next season most likely. Quote
Austin1985 Posted Friday at 09:21 PM Report Posted Friday at 09:21 PM Regardless of where Dulles and Randall land, the whole of Reg 3 needs to be re-examined Mr. Buddy Garrity and Goslin 2 Quote
purple reign Posted Saturday at 10:39 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 10:39 PM On 3/25/2025 at 7:31 PM, purple reign said: With ADM's having been released on TEA site taken last fall between UIL accounting years, it looks like both Richmond Randle from 5A-D2, the state champion, and Dulles dropping down from 6A will have to find a new home in 5A-D1. What district gets them? Dulles this year had 2165 and Randle 1966 and growing fast. Other Adm's for 5AD1 in region 3 follow: 9-5AD1: Baytown Sterling 2150 B. United 2035 B. West Brook 2213 Galveston Ball 1905 Lufkin 2026 Barbers Hill 2222 P.A. Memorial 2140 10-5AD1 Galena Park 1815 H. Austin 1181 H. Madison 1588 H. Milby 2126 H. Sharpstown 1689 H. Waldrip 1615 H.Westbury 2263 H. Spring Woods 2020 11-5AD1: Angleton 2025 Crosby 2148 FB Kempner 1850 Friendswood 2014 Kwood Park 1884 La Porte 2090 NC Porter 2094 Pasadena 2217 12-5AD1: A. Anderson 2223 Bastrop Ceder Creek 2144 Buda Hays 2304 College Station 2226 CS A & M Cons 2166 Kyle Lehman 2128 Lockhart 2006 PF. Hendrickson 2128 Pf.Weiss 1985 Angleton's adm should be 2225. Quote
lcm93 Posted Saturday at 11:24 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:24 PM How do you find the enrollment numbers on tea? Quote
purple reign Posted yesterday at 01:34 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:34 AM 1 hour ago, lcm93 said: How do you find the enrollment numbers on tea? Go to: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up On report line click the last one on the drop down "Selected totals using campus name",where it says "type here", type over that phrase with the name of the school. Where it says grade, ethnicty or gender, I usually select gender so that i only need to add 2 numbers together unless I have some interest in the other two, then click on "next" below that. Quote
lcm93 Posted yesterday at 02:48 AM Report Posted yesterday at 02:48 AM What was png and Nederland? Quote
Rez Posted yesterday at 03:17 AM Report Posted yesterday at 03:17 AM 28 minutes ago, lcm93 said: What was png and Nederland? PNG came in at something like 1705, Nederland about 150 less Quote
purple reign Posted yesterday at 04:30 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 04:30 AM 1 hour ago, lcm93 said: What was png and Nederland? PNG, 1720 , Nederland 1500 Quote
lcm93 Posted yesterday at 02:03 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:03 PM Spendora ? New caney west fork ? Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted yesterday at 02:05 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:05 PM 1 minute ago, lcm93 said: Spendora ? New caney west fork ? What about em?? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.