Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, UT alum said:

Source? All interviews are edited. Where’s the proof it was done to hide incompetence? I think you’re just spreading Trump lies. And don’t link me to Breitbart. I want a legit link.

Heck, I thought the CBS edit of Harris' goofy interview was now common knowledge.  2 things:  They did it to help her not look so stupid.  Or, they did it to try to help her for the up coming election.  Personally, I think it's both.  To me, either one of these would be election interference.  Critics, including Trump, alleged bias, with Trump filing a $10 billion lawsuit claiming election interference.

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
6 hours ago, Reagan said:

Heck, I thought the CBS edit of Harris' goofy interview was now common knowledge.  2 things:  They did it to help her not look so stupid.  Or, they did it to try to help her for the up coming election.  Personally, I think it's both.  To me, either one of these would be election interference.  Critics, including Trump, alleged bias, with Trump filing a $10 billion lawsuit claiming election interference.

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Trying to make Harris not look stupid was an impossible task, as tough as trying to make Biden look coherent.

Posted
16 hours ago, baddog said:

Even free speech has limitations. To be in control of a nationwide media outlet and broadcast fake news to the American public is treasonous. Losing their FCC license should be the least of their problems. 
The problem people have with the first amendment is that they think it allows them to do anything. 

Yeah, like trash our nation’s capitol. You are such a hypocrite, man.

Posted
11 hours ago, Reagan said:

Heck, I thought the CBS edit of Harris' goofy interview was now common knowledge.  2 things:  They did it to help her not look so stupid.  Or, they did it to try to help her for the up coming election.  Personally, I think it's both.  To me, either one of these would be election interference.  Critics, including Trump, alleged bias, with Trump filing a $10 billion lawsuit claiming election interference.

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Ok. You cited three sources that are notorious for lies and sensationalism. Did you actually read the CNN article? If you did, I don’t think you would have included it. There is no proof they edited any differently than is done standard. CBS settled to get the Weasel off their back. A gutless move, but the move they chose.

Posted
15 hours ago, baddog said:

Editing for length is one thing. Changing the entire word salad response is criminal, especially during an election run. Don’t let hate rule your judgement. 

There is no proof that happened.

Posted
26 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Ok. You cited three sources that are notorious for lies and sensationalism. Did you actually read the CNN article? If you did, I don’t think you would have included it. There is no proof they edited any differently than is done standard. CBS settled to get the Weasel off their back. A gutless move, but the move they chose.

If you are innocent, you don't make a deal!  There's no doubt that they edited her interview before the election for a reason.  But I think you knew that already.  

Posted
33 minutes ago, Reagan said:

If you are innocent, you don't make a deal!  There's no doubt that they edited her interview before the election for a reason.  But I think you knew that already.  

Yes, innocents do make deals. Had Trump any sense he would have made a deal with E. Jean Carrol. You say Trump was innocent of housing discrimination. He made a deal. It’s called settling out of court, and I’ll bet dollars to donuts there was a disclaimer that CBS admits no wrongdoing. If they were guilty, why did Trump offer a settlement? Why didn’t he push for the max? He wanted fast cash. 

Posted

Anybody with more than one functioning brain cell can see a difference in editing an answer for time and replacing an answer with a totally different one. It’s not rocket science and Kamala still looked like a buffoon. You can’t totally edit out stupid.

Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Yes, innocents do make deals. Had Trump any sense he would have made a deal with E. Jean Carrol. You say Trump was innocent of housing discrimination. He made a deal. It’s called settling out of court, and I’ll bet dollars to donuts there was a disclaimer that CBS admits no wrongdoing. If they were guilty, why did Trump offer a settlement? Why didn’t he push for the max? He wanted fast cash. 

CBS admitted they edited her interview.  Now the only question is why did they do it.  Personally, I think it's obvious.  I can also say with a reasonable amount of certitude that they would not have edited something of Trump's.

As for as Jean Carrol, wasn't he found innocent?  So, why would he pay?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,270
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    WayBackWhen23
    Newest Member
    WayBackWhen23
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...