Reagan Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 From the video: He states that the Supreme Court appears to be sympathetic to the Trump administration concerning these 675 trial judges who have no jurisdiction to bring the government to a halt with nation-wide injunctions. The Supreme Court is meeting in special session May 15 to hear oral arguments concerning this. It's unusual because they never hear cases in May. This should be over pretty quickly. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted Sunday at 05:18 PM Author Report Posted Sunday at 05:18 PM AOC may have finally got something right. She says a President should ignore a judge's ruling if the President disagrees with it. @Big girl @UT alum @Boyz N Da Hood @CardinalBacker Thoughts?! Quote
baddog Posted Sunday at 05:52 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:52 PM 29 minutes ago, Reagan said: AOC may have finally got something right. She says a President should ignore a judge's ruling if the President disagrees with it. @Big girl @UT alum @Boyz N Da Hood @CardinalBacker Thoughts?! They can’t even reply to this. A stand would have to be taken. Let this yo-yo run for president…..please. Actually she won’t even get nominated. She might even drop out quicker than Kamala. Quote
UT alum Posted Sunday at 09:47 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:47 PM 4 hours ago, Reagan said: AOC may have finally got something right. She says a President should ignore a judge's ruling if the President disagrees with it. @Big girl @UT alum @Boyz N Da Hood @CardinalBacker Thoughts?! It’s AOC for gosh sakes. I don’t side with her tactics. If the President is immune, what’s the point, anyway? Now, if you are talking ARRESTING judges you don’t like, I’d say someone’s taking lessons from Putin and Xi. Executive branch ordering the Judicial branch around? If that’s the kind of state you want, you need to move over there. Trump will never build it here, though the construction site will take years to clean up. Quote
Reagan Posted 6 hours ago Author Report Posted 6 hours ago On 4/27/2025 at 4:47 PM, UT alum said: It’s AOC for gosh sakes. I don’t side with her tactics. If the President is immune, what’s the point, anyway? Now, if you are talking ARRESTING judges you don’t like, I’d say someone’s taking lessons from Putin and Xi. Executive branch ordering the Judicial branch around? If that’s the kind of state you want, you need to move over there. Trump will never build it here, though the construction site will take years to clean up. At this time she is one of the faces of the present day Democratic party. She out polls Schumer. Could possibly beat him in the Demo Senate primary. They are also talking about her being the Demo nominee in 2028 for President. But as always these two are still hypocrites! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.