the trenches

[stang4life]

you guys cant be serious............you who got the better scholarship you guys are tripping forreal

You have no clue of what you are talking about.  Chavis had his choice of schools and chose to follow his brother to A&M.  I'm a big Texas fan, but how is a scholarship to Texas a better scholarship?  Both are free rides to D-I schools.  We'll just watch and see who becomes the better college football player.  My money is on Chavis. 

neither one of them impressed me this year and i can guarantee you texas wasnt a school that offered him but neway let me give you an example of how texas is better then........lets go by the players that texas gets and the players that a&m gets.............in the class of 09 texas gets players like garret gilbert arguably the best qb in the state of texas and ranked number 12 in the nation, thomas ashcraft, chris waley the best running back in the state of texas, greg timmons ranked 69 in the nation...........a&m doesnt have a verbal from one player one the rivals top 100 players in the class 09 they get all of texas leftovers thats why texas was able to get dravannti from a&m when he was commited there its a no brainer if texas offered the same kid that a&m did the player would pick texas hands down the university of texas is way better then a&m in every aspect

I think that each school has much to offer anyone interested in going to a great university.  There are some things that Texas has that are "better" than Texas A&M, but there are also things that Texas A&M has that are better than Texas.  And, that includes every aspect of both universities.  My son had an equal opportunity to go to either school (not for sports, but academically) and when you throw the "all aspects" thing in there...that just simply may not be true.  More goes into these decisions than just being Texas and/or Texas A&M...or at least it should.  Of course, Texas has a national championship, but are they are still both great schools. 

[fbplayer999]

if your talking about recruits then Randle-Kelly but if you mean players then. Brent Kimmey-Dayton, John Ward-Lumberton, Windbush-LCM.

All I have to say is who?  At the risk of sounding like a homer my vote is for Chavis.

not to continue with the hijack of this thread, but kimmey would be a major prospect if he was 2 inches taller. unfortunately, I don't think he's got another growth spurt in him. Chavis and Johnson have got the size and ability, total package.

I would have been to if i was 3 inches taller and .4 seconds faster in the 40 and 60 pounds stonger on bench and 100 pounds stonger on squat and if, etc.......................give me a break

[dayton]

if your talking about recruits then Randle-Kelly but if you mean players then. Brent Kimmey-Dayton, John Ward-Lumberton, Windbush-LCM.

All I have to say is who?  At the risk of sounding like a homer my vote is for Chavis.

not to continue with the hijack of this thread, but kimmey would be a major prospect if he was 2 inches taller. unfortunately, I don't think he's got another growth spurt in him. Chavis and Johnson have got the size and ability, total package.

I would have been to if i was 3 inches taller and .4 seconds faster in the 40 and 60 pounds stonger on bench and 100 pounds stonger on squat and if, etc.......................give me a break

easy there sport. I gave one exception. If Brent hadn't proved himself to be a force in this district, I wouldn't have said anything at all. also, I took nothing away from DJ or Chavis. In fact I called them both the total package. ........ give me a break.