Jump to content

Fastest Team in 2008?


Recommended Posts

I know that as of now Central is looking very fast in track, but I think they lose some of those guys and WOS is looking very fast as well.  I am not sure if the same people who run for WOS are on the football team.  I listened to three games this year on the radio and I cant remember any one except the Franks kids named being called.  I also think that West Brook will be fast as usual, and I think the ZEN may be a little down by looking at the track times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that as of now Central is looking very fast in track, but I think they lose some of those guys and WOS is looking very fast as well.  I am not sure if the same people who run for WOS are on the football team.  I listened to three games this year on the radio and I cant remember any one except the Franks kids named being called.  I also think that West Brook will be fast as usual, and I think the ZEN may be a little down by looking at the track times.

WOS will be loaded with speed next year Franks, Gloston, Haynes, there on both relay teams.

Central will lose their main horse Hall to A&M

Ozen will also lose some speed but honestly in the Pear Orachard there will be speed coming from some where

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please don't get me started on this topic!  I thought the entire year that Haynes and Gloston were one of the fastest kids around and they rarely got to see the ball.  I know we had the Garrett Boys and Hypolite, but whenever we needed big plays they did not have the break a way speed that these two did.  I am not sure about Franks!!  To me that seemed like one of the biggest differences in this years offense and the one from years past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest agswin

Please don't get me started on this topic!  I thought the entire year that Haynes and Gloston were one of the fastest kids around and they rarely got to see the ball.  I know we had the Garrett Boys and Hypolite, but whenever we needed big plays they did not have the break a way speed that these two did.  I am not sure about Franks!!  To me that seemed like one of the biggest differences in this years offense and the one from years past.

yeah we all know the haynes and gloston kids are fast ....but let me tell u right now that franks kid has got some wheels he's really surprised me this year on the track .....i was lookin at the area times in track and he has the 2nd or 3rd fastest time in the 200 somethin like a 22.29 ...he's really stepped his speed up and is really starting to look like a Franks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HELLO Beaumont fans!!! If you want to see speed Watch westfield when they come to town. NOT a slow kid on the roster..

Let me say this, Yes, Westfield is fast. BUT, if you guys hadn't lost to Cy-Falls the week before you guys played West Brook, the Bruins would/should have won that game. The refs won ya'll that game because there is no way that they allow 'the mighty Westfield Mustangs' to lose two games in a row, and you know it. The refs cheated on several calls that put the game in your favor. Soulja was right, West Brook had ya'll on the ropes and should have won the game, but the refs intervened (the off sides penalty that negated a TD)and the Mustangs won. Stick around and see what happens next year at our house! PODNAH! ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lumberton is a faster team than Central !!!  Its like comparing a AMTRAK to a locamotive.

Some of you L-Town folks never cease to amaze me---every time that I think I have heard the most stupid thing you seem to come back with another one---Lumberton faster than Central ???? don't think so
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...