Jump to content

Nederland vs WOS Week 0!!! Your Thoughts....


Guest 87CRU79

Recommended Posts

Guest 87CRU79

The old rivalry is renewed!!!

WOS has gotten the best of Nederland the last two meetings between these teams, but Nederland had WOS' number the three contests before those two.

What are yall's thoughts on this years match up???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

drove thru nederland the other day and saw the scoreboard.  it is HUGE!!!  the scoreboard is so big that it makes the stadium look small.  i was very impressed.   8)

Thats why we need to replace the stadium!!  ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 87CRU79

Nederland has a lot of talent coming off of last years team:

Offense

QB - (3) Kirby Bellow, Jr

WR - (21) Asa Cardenas, Sr

WR - (7) Ryan Brady, Jr

WR - (4) Brandon Salenga, So

OL - (56) Trey Terracina, Sr

OL - (54) Stefan Huber, Sr

Defense

DL - (2) Wareall Grogan, Sr

LB - (40) Grant Lovelady, Jr

LB - 8 - Jordan Landry, Sr

DB - (22) Justin Krautz, Sr

DB - (24) Jimmy Swain, Sr

DB - (25) Adrian Pina, Sr

I believe that Nederland will have a solid core of leadership returning from last year's 7-3 team. If Bellow can return to form after a standout sophomore year, he will have arguebly the best receiving core in the area. Questions loom though: Will Larry Neumann return as head coach? In year 2 AM (After Mosley), can Nederland find a consistent RB for the 2008 season? We shall see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nederland has a lot of talent coming off of last years team:

Offense

QB - (3) Kirby Bellow, Jr

WR - (21) Asa Cardenas, Sr

WR - (7) Ryan Brady, Jr

WR - (4) Brandon Salenga, So

OL - (56) Trey Terracina, Sr

OL - (54) Stefan Huber, Sr

Defense

DL - (2) Wareall Grogan, Sr

LB - (40) Grant Lovelady, Jr

LB - 8 - Jordan Landry, Sr

DB - (22) Justin Krautz, Sr

DB - (24) Jimmy Swain, Sr

DB - (25) Adrian Pina, Sr

I believe that Nederland will have a solid core of leadership returning from last year's 7-3 team. If Bellow can return to form after a standout sophomore year, he will have arguebly the best receiving core in the area. Questions loom though: Will Larry Neumann return as head coach? In year 2 AM (After Mosley), can Nederland find a consistent RB for the 2008 season? We shall see...

Even if Neumann returns(and he will, Suggs gets the job @LM), there's still Spell running that swiss cheese D which gave up 40+ points the last 3 games on avg., on that big pretty score board.  Matter of fact, I heard after Dayton got done, it was leaning to the right lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nederland has a lot of talent coming off of last years team:

Offense

QB - (3) Kirby Bellow, Jr

WR - (21) Asa Cardenas, Sr

WR - (7) Ryan Brady, Jr

WR - (4) Brandon Salenga, So

OL - (56) Trey Terracina, Sr

OL - (54) Stefan Huber, Sr

Defense

DL - (2) Wareall Grogan, Sr

LB - (40) Grant Lovelady, Jr

LB - 8 - Jordan Landry, Sr

DB - (22) Justin Krautz, Sr

DB - (24) Jimmy Swain, Sr

DB - (25) Adrian Pina, Sr

I believe that Nederland will have a solid core of leadership returning from last year's 7-3 team. If Bellow can return to form after a standout sophomore year, he will have arguebly the best receiving core in the area. Questions loom though: Will Larry Neumann return as head coach? In year 2 AM (After Mosley), can Nederland find a consistent RB for the 2008 season? We shall see...

Even if Neumann returns(and he will, Suggs gets the job @LM), there's still Spell running that swiss cheese D which gave up 40+ points the last 3 games on avg., on that big pretty score board.  Matter of fact, I heard after Dayton got done, it was leaning to the right lol

wow you are a funny guy, again what team do you support?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Penny

SFA85, who coached the defenses that dominated Bay City in the 00 Regional Final, shutdown both of the McCown led Jacksonville offenses, stopped the unstoppable Friendswood offense in the Regional Final of 01... I could go on.

You have a short memory... or you don't know jack freakin xxit about high school football... where coaches don't get to recruit players.  Has Nederland been soft on Defense... heck yeah, no joke, tell folks something they don't know.  To blame it on a coach who has been one of the great defensive minds in the area... give me a break... you embarrass yourself.  Go ask Cornell Thompson what he thinks of Spell and you would be FREAKIN embarrassed.  Keep talkin... Nederland will have personnel again shortly to play defense... we'll see what you have to say.  Give it about 2-3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SFA85, who coached the defenses that dominated Bay City in the 00 Regional Final, shutdown both of the McCown led Jacksonville offenses, stopped the unstoppable Friendswood offense in the Regional Final of 01... I could go on.

You have a short memory... or you don't know jack freakin xxit about high school football... where coaches don't get to recruit players.  Has Nederland been soft on Defense... heck yeah, no joke, tell folks something they don't know.  To blame it on a coach who has been one of the great defensive minds in the area... give me a break... you embarrass yourself.  Go ask Cornell Thompson what he thinks of Spell and you would be FREAKIN embarrassed.  Keep talkin... Nederland will have personnel again shortly to play defense... we'll see what you have to say.  Give it about 2-3 years.

The same cat who coached those defenses is the same cat who now presides of that crab net defense @Nederland but don't get your panties in a knot Penny.  Then numbers don't lie.  Funny thing also, the more all-staters/pseudo-All americans in your defense, the worse stastically y'all have gotten.  It's no big secret on how to beat Nederland the last 6 years:  Run right down their throats.  That's a failure in coaching and preparation that starts with Nuemann.  Now, with Saint Mosely gone, y'all have gotten soft on O.  Looking like a poor-man's Lumberton of the late 90's/early 00's.  But don't be mad at me.  The proof of what I say are in the numbers......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Penny

SFA, so you're telling me that Neumann all of a sudden said, hey we're going to be soft against the run, I know what worked for the past 7-8 years when we dominated on defense, but we're not going to teach that anymore??? You kill me buddy, you're like a night at the Improv.  I'm not mad at you, I'm at the games, I know why we're soft against the run.  I'm not mad at you, I feel sorry for you that you go after a guy like Larry Neumann, he is a class act.  I'm sure Suggs is as well, he's a great football coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...