Jump to content

Lamar Head Football Coach


Recommended Posts

Anybody heard if the head coaching job has been narrowed down or who the front runners are? I would like to see someone from this area with some college coaching exp get the job. We need someone who will be willing to stay and build a program and can recruit from this area. Craig Stump or Ben Norton, IMO should be heading up the list. What does everyone else think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A high profile coach who knows how to build a program is what we need... who is ben norton?

Ben Norton would be the best hire if you want someone that knows how to win in the SLC...

Time at SHSU, McNeese and now at Texas State - San Marcos. Graduate of SFA.

Vidor native. Recruits Golden Triangle.

Would love nothing more than to coach at Lamar.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A high profile coach who knows how to build a program is what we need... who is ben norton?

Ben Norton would be the best hire if you want someone that knows how to win in the SLC...

Time at SHSU, McNeese and now at Texas State - San Marcos. Graduate of SFA.

Vidor native. Recruits Golden Triangle.

Would love nothing more than to coach at Lamar.

This is the hidden content, please

As much as you spit on Texas st football, you want one of Texas st assistant to build Lamar's program.

That sounds desperate to me. Terror you must really fear Lamars rise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as you spit on Texas st football, you want one of Texas st assistant to build Lamar's program.  That sounds desperate to me. Terror you must really fear Lamars rise.

He was a SHSU assistant before he landed in San Marcos. Major part of our 2004 run. I think he's going to be a finalist. Tubbs would be in the wrong not to give him a up close and personal look considering the names I've seen do not as many SLC ties (since you don't want Jim Bob) as Norton...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as you spit on Texas st football, you want one of Texas st assistant to build Lamar's program.  That sounds desperate to me. Terror you must really fear Lamars rise.

He was a SHSU assistant before he landed in San Marcos. Major part of our 2004 run. I think he's going to be a finalist. Tubbs would be in the wrong not to give him a up close and personal look considering the names I've seen do not as many SLC ties (since you don't want Jim Bob) as Norton...

HaHa, in your dreams. Reguardless of the fact he coached at SHSU, you have posted many times basically saying Texas st sucks at football.

Yet you want Lamar to hire one of the coaches of a team you says sucks. I bet you have dreams of LU football failing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as you spit on Texas st football, you want one of Texas st assistant to build Lamar's program.  That sounds desperate to me. Terror you must really fear Lamars rise.

He was a SHSU assistant before he landed in San Marcos. Major part of our 2004 run. I think he's going to be a finalist. Tubbs would be in the wrong not to give him a up close and personal look considering the names I've seen do not as many SLC ties (since you don't want Jim Bob) as Norton...

Why? So he is a good assistant at the SLC level... none of us including Tubbs want us to stay long term in the Southland Conference, the man has only really coached in the SLC and has no head coaching experience in the College at all... seems like just another applicant. I hear most likely that the man who gets this job hasn't applied yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? So he is a good assistant at the SLC level... none of us including Tubbs want us to stay long term in the Southland Conference, the man has only really coached in the SLC and has no head coaching experience in the College at all... seems like just another applicant. I hear most likely that the man who gets this job hasn't applied yet.

I find that hard to believe that Tubbs does not want to stay long term in the SLC. He's doing a respectable job as far as making his voice heard in this conference as he works to "improve" it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? So he is a good assistant at the SLC level... none of us including Tubbs want us to stay long term in the Southland Conference, the man has only really coached in the SLC and has no head coaching experience in the College at all... seems like just another applicant. I hear most likely that the man who gets this job hasn't applied yet.

I find that hard to believe that Tubbs does not want to stay long term in the SLC. He's doing a respectable job as far as making his voice heard in this conference as he works to "improve" it...

Hey, let's not put the cart before the horse here. Tubbs would be stupid to look beyond SLC for atleast the next 10 years. Let's get the program established and running. When you start whipping the boys across the Sabine, then we can talk about beyond the SLC. And everyone can stop dreaming, we're not getting a "Big Name" coach coming to Lamar to start a 20 year dead program! We need someone with college level coaching exp., and local ties to here. Someone willing to endure 1-9 and 2-8 seasons for the next 2-4 years. Your not going to see the Mac Brown's or Les Miles' lining up for that job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? So he is a good assistant at the SLC level... none of us including Tubbs want us to stay long term in the Southland Conference, the man has only really coached in the SLC and has no head coaching experience in the College at all... seems like just another applicant. I hear most likely that the man who gets this job hasn't applied yet.

I find that hard to believe that Tubbs does not want to stay long term in the SLC. He's doing a respectable job as far as making his voice heard in this conference as he works to "improve" it...

Hey, let's not put the cart before the horse here. Tubbs would be stupid to look beyond SLC for atleast the next 10 years. Let's get the program established and running. When you start whipping the boys across the Sabine, then we can talk about beyond the SLC. And everyone can stop dreaming, we're not getting a "Big Name" coach coming to Lamar to start a 20 year dead program! We need someone with college level coaching exp., and local ties to here. Someone willing to endure 1-9 and 2-8 seasons for the next 2-4 years. Your not going to see the Mac Brown's or Les Miles' lining up for that job!

No, just the opposite, not looking beyond the slc is stupid. Nobody wants to see Lamar vs Nicholls st or Lamar vs Tarleton st. Nobody except Terror.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking beyond the SLC in the next ten years is a pipe dream. There is noting wrong with palying the SLC for a few years to get you up on your feet. McNeese packs them in over at their place, we need to start by looking over there. Probably not going to build a domed stadium in downtown Beaumont either. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? So he is a good assistant at the SLC level... none of us including Tubbs want us to stay long term in the Southland Conference, the man has only really coached in the SLC and has no head coaching experience in the College at all... seems like just another applicant. I hear most likely that the man who gets this job hasn't applied yet.

I find that hard to believe that Tubbs does not want to stay long term in the SLC. He's doing a respectable job as far as making his voice heard in this conference as he works to "improve" it...

Hey, let's not put the cart before the horse here. Tubbs would be stupid to look beyond SLC for atleast the next 10 years. Let's get the program established and running. When you start whipping the boys across the Sabine, then we can talk about beyond the SLC. And everyone can stop dreaming, we're not getting a "Big Name" coach coming to Lamar to start a 20 year dead program! We need someone with college level coaching exp., and local ties to here. Someone willing to endure 1-9 and 2-8 seasons for the next 2-4 years. Your not going to see the Mac Brown's or Les Miles' lining up for that job!

Just stating what I heard... and I know Billy doesn't want Lamar to be stuck in the Southland Conference forever. He wants better for Lamar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking beyond the SLC in the next ten years is a pipe dream. There is noting wrong with palying the SLC for a few years to get you up on your feet. McNeese packs them in over at their place, we need to start by looking over there. Probably not going to build a domed stadium in downtown Beaumont either. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Staying in the Southland is like putting Lamar on the crack pipe. There was a study that came out a few weeks ago that said this area has an

inferior view of it's self. The people in this area feel Beaumont should never better itself, Houston and Austin deserves anything new and innovative. That we

are not worthy of any considered good. So there is loud voices screaming to keep the status quo. You can see it on this forum, you can see it in the Jefferson county

leaders, you can see it when you look at the history of Lamar between 1970 to 1999. Thank Goodness Dr Simmons and the Legend is not of that mnindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking beyond the SLC in the next ten years is a pipe dream. There is noting wrong with palying the SLC for a few years to get you up on your feet. McNeese packs them in over at their place, we need to start by looking over there. Probably not going to build a domed stadium in downtown Beaumont either. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Staying in the Southland is like putting Lamar on the crack pipe. There was a study that came out a few weeks ago that said this area has an

inferior view of it's self. The people in this area feel Beaumont should never better itself, Houston and Austin deserves anything new and innovative. That we

are not worthy of any considered good. So there is loud voices screaming to keep the status quo. You can see it on this forum, you can see it in the Jefferson county

leaders, you can see it when you look at the history of Lamar between 1970 to 1999. Thank Goodness Dr Simmons and the Legend is not of that mnindset.

I may be having a senior moment but I seem to remember Lamar decided to go back to the Southland after several years of playing with the big dogs in the Sun Belt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking beyond the SLC in the next ten years is a pipe dream. There is noting wrong with palying the SLC for a few years to get you up on your feet. McNeese packs them in over at their place, we need to start by looking over there. Probably not going to build a domed stadium in downtown Beaumont either. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Staying in the Southland is like putting Lamar on the crack pipe. There was a study that came out a few weeks ago that said this area has an

inferior view of it's self. The people in this area feel Beaumont should never better itself, Houston and Austin deserves anything new and innovative. That we

are not worthy of any considered good. So there is loud voices screaming to keep the status quo. You can see it on this forum, you can see it in the Jefferson county

leaders, you can see it when you look at the history of Lamar between 1970 to 1999. Thank Goodness Dr Simmons and the Legend is not of that mnindset.

I may be having a senior moment but I seem to remember Lamar decided to go back to the Southland after several years of playing with the big dogs in the Sun Belt.

Big dawgs like La-Monroe, school pop. 7,000. Lamar came back to the SLC because someone had the mentallity of a fly. Every week I use to see Lamar name

on the big board at Ceasars Palace, Barbary Coast, Flamingo, Mirage, and Star Dust(RIP). Southland teams don't make the board. Bad leadership is so frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamar came back to the Southland because at the time the University as a whole was in horrible shape financially and couldn't afford the travel costs in the Sunbelt.  Dr. Cottle rectified the finances problem during his tenure and Dr. Simmons has done an excellent job of taking the foundation laid by Cottle and steadily improving the University in all areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamar came back to the Southland because at the time the University as a whole was in horrible shape financially and couldn't afford the travel costs in the Sunbelt.  Dr. Cottle rectified the finances problem during his tenure and Dr. Simmons has done an excellent job of taking the foundation laid by Cottle and steadily improving the University in all areas.

Lamar was getting "dogged" in the Sunbelt and the expenses and LOSING didn't look good on the balance sheets. Enough said!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamar came back to the Southland because at the time the University as a whole was in horrible shape financially and couldn't afford the travel costs in the Sunbelt.  Dr. Cottle rectified the finances problem during his tenure and Dr. Simmons has done an excellent job of taking the foundation laid by Cottle and steadily improving the University in all areas.

Same excuse used to drop football.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, I dont mean to hijack your post, but...........arent we suppose to be talking about the new HC at Lamar and who it might possibly be? Any ideas?

We are all idea out. We are ready to here the real name so we can start discuss how this coach should build this team. We are experts

ya know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...