KFDM COOP Posted June 6, 2008 Author Report Posted June 6, 2008 SFA...A guy from Memorial told me they will be ready for the big boys from Wallisville Road.
SFA85 Posted June 6, 2008 Report Posted June 6, 2008 SFA...A guy from Memorial told me they will be ready for the big boys from Wallisville Road. Yeah, that's the shyt talker in us. From what I saw and the schemes they're attempting to run, all I see them getting ready for is an ass whipping of Biblical proportions
KFDM COOP Posted June 6, 2008 Author Report Posted June 6, 2008 Who do you see Memorial beating this year? Non District included..
SFA85 Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 Who do you see Memorial beating this year? Non District included.. They could easily go into district 0-5. At best 2-3 non-district and 3-2 in district. Something between 3-7 and 5-5 for the season....
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 NS will not win this district. they can get the big head if they want. Its a team on the west end of BMT that will have a say in that. And im not to sure NS wont have they're hands full with even PAM. You know they bi-polar. anything can happen.
SFA85 Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 NS will not win this district. they can get the big head if they want. Its a team on the west end of BMT that will have a say in that. And im not to sure NS wont have they're hands full with even PAM. You know they bi-polar. anything can happen. Scooter whatever you're smokin', you need to quit. I've seen on tape and live what NS brings to the table. WB is ultrathin on defense, and PAM's ultrathin on offense plus their offensive and defensive schemes are sissy @best. NS keeps a squad of grown men in their football program and will continue their district dominance until the UIL suffles the deck in 2010......
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 NS will not win this district. they can get the big head if they want. Its a team on the west end of BMT that will have a say in that. And im not to sure NS wont have they're hands full with even PAM. You know they bi-polar. anything can happen. Scooter whatever you're smokin', you need to quit. I've seen on tape and live what NS brings to the table. WB is ultrathin on defense, and PAM's ultrathin on offense plus their offensive and defensive schemes are sissy @best. NS keeps a squad of grown men in their football program and will continue their district dominance until the UIL suffles the deck in 2010...... Hey luck might be on wb and pam side this year..  NS thought they was gonna waltz into P.A. and beat TJ (i wanna say 97) and left with a L.
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 PAM could be a good team if they shore up that D. Right now based off of past years their just an average team that runs the spread unfortunately. WB on the other hand has a chance to be a great team. I just dont think NS is just gonna ride through this district like everyone says they will.
SFA85 Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 PAM could be a good team if they shore up that D. Right now based off of past years their just an average team that runs the spread unfortunately. WB on the other hand has a chance to be a great team. I just dont think NS is just gonna ride through this district like everyone says they will. Give it up Scooter. PAM can't run the rock nor stop the run. WB has to run the receivers both ways @DB plus replace 2 D1 DE's. I tell you what, NS looses to either, I won't post here ever again.....
82 5A State Champs Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 PAM could be a good team if they shore up that D. Right now based off of past years their just an average team that runs the spread unfortunately. WB on the other hand has a chance to be a great team. I just dont think NS is just gonna ride through this district like everyone says they will. Give it up Scooter. PAM can't run the rock nor stop the run. WB has to run the receivers both ways @DB plus replace 2 D1 DE's. I tell you what, NS looses to either, I won't post here ever again..... Ooohhh....I'll take that action! >
BMTSoulja1 Posted June 7, 2008 Report Posted June 7, 2008 Yall trippin :D. Scooter, you better not let 85 sucker you in, man! ;D ;D
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 8, 2008 Report Posted June 8, 2008 Yall trippin :D. Scooter, you better not let 85 sucker you in, man! ;D ;D :D :D
KFDM COOP Posted June 9, 2008 Author Report Posted June 9, 2008 PAM could be a good team if they shore up that D. Right now based off of past years their just an average team that runs the spread unfortunately. WB on the other hand has a chance to be a great team. I just dont think NS is just gonna ride through this district like everyone says they will. Give it up Scooter. PAM can't run the rock nor stop the run. WB has to run the receivers both ways @DB plus replace 2 D1 DE's. I tell you what, NS looses to either, I won't post here ever again.....
Guest Cardinal Posted June 13, 2008 Report Posted June 13, 2008 There's no excuse in Memorial not having a good Defense.
SFA85 Posted June 14, 2008 Report Posted June 14, 2008 There's no excuse in Memorial not having a good Defense. This isn't an excuse, it's a reason: They run the Spread which is a soft offense thus making that 3-3-5 junk a soft defense. Ever since that old man's been there, soft football teams and the whole program is down in all sports.....
Guest Kelly Football Posted June 15, 2008 Report Posted June 15, 2008 Why won't they change the Defense?
SFA85 Posted June 15, 2008 Report Posted June 15, 2008 Why won't they change the Defense? I guess they feel the majority of their schedule are spread teams but I got news for them: I know of 4 teams off the top of my head who run the ball including NS. They will get blown out of the water running that junk against the Mustangs
Guest Kelly Football Posted June 15, 2008 Report Posted June 15, 2008 They got you guys picked 3rd in District and 7 starters back on Defense.
SFA85 Posted June 15, 2008 Report Posted June 15, 2008 They could have all 11 back from last year. It's not the personnel, it's the scheme....
KFDM COOP Posted June 30, 2008 Author Report Posted June 30, 2008 PAM could be a good team if they shore up that D. Right now based off of past years their just an average team that runs the spread unfortunately. WB on the other hand has a chance to be a great team. I just dont think NS is just gonna ride through this district like everyone says they will. NS only has 3 starters back on Offense but the 3 are Studs.
BigWolf10 Posted June 30, 2008 Report Posted June 30, 2008 all I have to say is, NS reloads every year. Where do they get them studs?
TradinUp BH Posted July 1, 2008 Report Posted July 1, 2008 North Shore followed very closely by WB. This should be a good district this year.
Guest Wildcat 08 Posted July 1, 2008 Report Posted July 1, 2008 Should be a good one with WB and The Shore.
Recommended Posts