7mary3 Posted August 29, 2008 Report Posted August 29, 2008 Being a felony will require him a DAEP placement thus keeping him out of extra curricular. Would he receive DAEP before a trial? Not sure how that works. By law if a student in the State of Texas get's arrested, felony or not, the school has be notified by the arresting agency. Action's taken by the school depend on what kind of disciplinary rules/regulations the school has. With it being an aggravated robbery charge the school may deem the subject a danger to the students and faculty and SHOULD not allow the subject back on campus until the disposition of the case, but again thats up to the school administration. Can't wait to see how this will turn out.
td Posted August 29, 2008 Report Posted August 29, 2008 Being a felony will require him a DAEP placement thus keeping him out of extra curricular. Would he receive DAEP before a trial? Not sure how that works. By law if a student in the State of Texas get's arrested, felony or not, the school has be notified by the arresting agency. Action's taken by the school depend on what kind of disciplinary rules/regulations the school has. With it being an aggravated robbery charge the school may deem the subject a danger to the students and faculty and SHOULD not allow the subject back on campus until the disposition of the case, but again thats up to the school administration. Can't wait to see how this will turn out. It's nice to have someone that knows the facts.
stang4life Posted August 29, 2008 Report Posted August 29, 2008 Wonder how our local school districts would handle it? Just curious. ???
stangchain Posted August 30, 2008 Report Posted August 30, 2008 Take the case of a young man from WOS who was arrested on the practice field in front of many area news cameras some years ago. They made him strip on the field (remove his football gear), handcuffed him and led him off to the jail with the media in tow. Funny how the media was called prior to the situation, isn't it? The police supposedly had video PROOF of the kid doing a drug deal, with a date and time stamped video. The video may very well have been the kid. That has never been determined, but the date and time was laughable. Several coaches appeared before the court to attest that the kid was ON THE BUS headed to a football game when the alleged event took place. Kid is released and the charges are dropped. Egg on the face of the LE in Orange. I think that our administration allowed the kid to continue to practice because of the testimony of the coaches and the bogus charges.
LHSALLZONE Posted August 30, 2008 Report Posted August 30, 2008 white,black, brown,doesnt really matter. when a crime is comitted,pulling a gun & robbing someone is a crime,at least the last time i checked,this individual & whoever was with him,should recieve what the law allows & no sports option considered. race comments are just stupid,any color flesh can pull a gun. the act of wrong is whats punishable,whether by local authoritys or by the school district. if this young man is guilty,& this schools coaches through some kind of descion ,by law or other means,let this kid play after pulling a gun, now that would be the shame of us all. second chance for this young man, you bet,after he is rehab & shown the higher road. second chance to play high school football, no way. hmmm, other young men should see a correct descion in this case. maybe bullet proof pads for the other team,security gaurds with riot gear at hand. i remember a movie of a running back while trying to score , pulls gun from uniform and shoots defensive player right before making a td. thats all i have to say about this . :'( :'(
Recommended Posts