Jump to content

Kirbyville whoops Jasper once again!!


Recommended Posts

Guest bleed orange

Both teams fought hard, but Kirbyville outlasted them bulldogs 44-43. It was a high scoring game like everybody predicted....considering it was a rivarly game. Kirbyville will take on WOS which I predict will be a better match than ever before.

Sorry but WOS is not Jasper. You will lose this one and it won't be close. ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both teams fought hard, but Kirbyville outlasted them bulldogs 44-43. It was a high scoring game like everybody predicted....considering it was a rivarly game. Kirbyville will take on WOS which I predict will be a better match than ever before.

Sorry but WOS is not Jasper. You will lose this one and it won't be close. ;D

One point is not a whooping son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kirbyville beat us yes they did.  BUT it wasn't their offence that did it.  Their specialty teams wooped Jasper.  Kickoff run back for a TD , punt runback for a TD, two 2 point conversions allowed and one tipped field goal attempt.  If it hadn't been for those teams the outcome would be different.  Great job cats on those teams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I must admit I am a man about it, Kirbyville won good job, but I must say Jasper played a good game and Kirbyville did also, I can see both teams going deep in the playoffs, Armstrong #4 was the key to the running game, and Spikes#10 was the key to the passing game. Jasper need to get everything in sink because the coaching staff need to recognize that Bailey can't win the game by himself. Bailey is  a great Athlete, but coaches in the surrounding area has figured a game plan for him. Offensive coordinator, lets wake up and mix things up, it seem like to me after Spikes didn't play the whole third quarter, due to the cramping your other receivers got outta sink. My hat goes out to #32, #11, #5,and number #1, and #4 for kirbyville good game. Man that was a good game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both teams fought hard, but Kirbyville outlasted them bulldogs 44-43. It was a high scoring game like everybody predicted....considering it was a rivarly game. Kirbyville will take on WOS which I predict will be a better match than ever before.

DUDE, IT'S SEEMS BY THE SCORE THAT NO DEFENSE WAS PLAYED BY EITHER SCHOOL. NEWS FLASH" WE PLAY DEFENSE."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both teams fought hard, but Kirbyville outlasted them bulldogs 44-43. It was a high scoring game like everybody predicted....considering it was a rivarly game. Kirbyville will take on WOS which I predict will be a better match than ever before.

Sorry but WOS is not Jasper. You will lose this one and it won't be close. ;D

Kirbyville will match up better this year like I said. Kirbyville by 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both teams fought hard, but Kirbyville outlasted them bulldogs 44-43. It was a high scoring game like everybody predicted....considering it was a rivarly game. Kirbyville will take on WOS which I predict will be a better match than ever before.

Sorry but WOS is not Jasper. You will lose this one and it won't be close. ;D

Kirbyville will match up better this year like I said. Kirbyville by 7

:D :D :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bulldog fan (Land95) talked all that crap and get disappointed once again. ;D ;D ;D

Yea what ever.Good game K-ville but you know you guys got lucky better get those CB. SS. FS. in shape cause if jasper WR. would have been able to hold on the ball you know it would have been a jasper win.But it is what it is.Good Game KATS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah yeah

A bulldog fan (Land95) talked all that crap and get disappointed once again. ;D ;D ;D

Yea what ever.Good game K-ville but you know you guys got lucky better get those CB. SS. FS. in shape cause if jasper WR. would have been able to hold on the ball you know it would have been a jasper win.But it is what it is.Good Game KATS.

Woulda, coulda, shoulda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just as an observer with no ties to them, i would say that jasper has beat themselves the last two games with poor special teams and dropped passes...i was at the Jasper-Gilmer game and the KO return by gilmer and the dropped pass in the endzone in 4th really stick out in my mind as game changing, and from reading about this game it seems like special teams lost it for em...so jasper is much better than the 0-2 record shows, JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this game was exciting for both sides,very intense. Yes, there were alot of mistakes made, missed passes, tackles, etc. for both teams, but they kept trying.  It reminded me of the Kville vs. Silsbee game last year, down to the wire with a one point win, on a 2 point conversion.  Good luck to both teams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...