WOS or WB (with current rooster)

[wosgrad-84]

Just for giggles since there will be no football this week who would win between these two teams.

[hjhawks]

west brook.................................

nothing against wos, but size, strength, DEPTH.....    really?

[WOS95]

i'd have to say west brook.  wos has as much talent as anyone who steps on the field with them.  in this case, however, i think west brook would just be too much to handle.  i will say though, it would be fun to see how christian michael would do against a cornel thompson chain gang defense.  8)

[82 5A State Champs]

West Brook!

[Guest gladiator2]

Yes, this is very funny. West Brook 56 WOS 13. Stump has the best offense around with a powerful RB. WB too much to handle!!

[BigWolf10]

Yes, this is very funny. West Brook 56 WOS 13. Stump has the best offense around with a powerful RB. WB too much to handle!!

WB TOO much debt

[Serpentor]

WB, but it wouldnt be a blow out

[WOS87]

WOS 10, WB 7 in a repeat of the classic 1984 upset

[KFDM COOP]

Closer than people think!

[westend1]

Brook scores in the 40's against WOS, before they pull the starters.

[katdaddy]

Close first half, WB pulls away in 2nd.....42-14

[Bruin4Life]

Close first half, WB pulls away in 2nd.....42-14

katdaddy knows west brook football ;D

[griff]

No 3A school, even one as good as WO-S, has any business playing a strong 5A school.  WO-S would make a respectable showing, but would lose it in the 2nd half.  WB has too much size and depth. 

[82 5A State Champs]

No 3A school, even one as good as WO-S, has any business playing a strong 5A school.  WO-S would make a respectable showing, but would lose it in the 2nd half.  WB has too much size and depth. 

Size? yes! Team speed? Yes! Depth? Not yet! GIve us about two more years, and we'll have some depth. We currently only have around 46 players on the varsity roster on Friday nights. I'd like to see somewhere in the mid 60's in a couple of years. But no, WO-S shouldn't be much of a problem!

[griff]

No 3A school, even one as good as WO-S, has any business playing a strong 5A school.  WO-S would make a respectable showing, but would lose it in the 2nd half.  WB has too much size and depth. 

Size? yes! Team speed? Yes! Depth? Not yet! GIve us about two more years, and we'll have some depth. We currently only have around 46 players on the varsity roster on Friday nights. I'd like to see somewhere in the mid 60's in a couple of years. But no, WO-S shouldn't be much of a problem!

Only 46, huh?  Still, on average, a successful 5A program will typically have more depth than WO-S who suits out between 25 - 30 players every year.  WO-S coaches traditionally get the most out of the numbers they have, which keeps them a stout 3A team that would also be very competitive in any 4A district, but a 5A district would be too much to keep up with in a 10-week season.     

[82 5A State Champs]

I agree.

[WOSHIGHc/o2001]

I hate hearing this.  LOL  Its hard for Mustang fans to hear this.  Although its logical.  How many players does WOS have?  I'd say around 25-30.  What if this same game was played with both teams having the same number of kids allowed to play?? (Since this is all for fun)  Would the outcome be different?

[Gasilla]

I think The Brook would probably win, but it would not be a blow out. Probably more like 24-14.

[Majestyk]

West Brook should win because they have to, they would never live down losing to a 3A school as a powerhouse 5A school even if it is WO-S.  But should aint got nothing to do with it, I'd take WO-S  48-16.

[westend1]

West Brook should win because they have to, they would never live down losing to a 3A school as a powerhouse 5A school even if it is WO-S.  But should aint got nothing to do with it, I'd take WO-S  48-16.

Ha ha ha ha ha.  Are you clueless or just stirring?

[WOS92]

Depth makes it impossible for a team of 25 like WO-S to beat WB. But if you presented some fantasy situation in which the teams were equalized - like starters only - WO-S handily. WB has been reasonably good in recent years, but has had horrifically awful years. WO-S always finds a way to field a winning team - usually dominant.

[Guest abovetherim]

My sister lives down from WO-S stadium, I played against those guys and they are ALWAYS good. However, I'm not sure the starters this year versus WB would win "handily".

Heck, they (WB) may have the best RB in the country. Their O-line and D-line is better than WO-S. The skilled positions outside WB RB would be a wash. I'd give the nod to WO-S coaching staff because Coach Hooks has multiple state championships.

[westend1]

Brook top 22 against WOS top 22 is still a blowout for WB.  WOS way too small to stop the running game.  Dayton should have taught you guys something.  Your own posters said Dayton was too big and athletic.  It would only be worse against the Brook this year.

[Guest Dirk Diggler]

That was a dam scrimmage with 2 starters missing. Sorry, wouldn't happen now. Close game.

[Guest tigersvoice]

I'm not sure whose "rooster" would win, only the hens can say that, but Westbrook would outlast WO-S in this matchup on the football field.  Sure would be fun to see.