Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest bucwheat
Posted

The question of the night!!! should they have went for two????

Posted

The question of the night!!! should they have went for two????

Yes, you gotta be in it to win it.

Guest bucwheat
Posted

I say go for two also..they are lucky they scored that last one and I believe they should have went for two also...Just my opinion..

Posted

Didn't that happen several years ago in this game and Vidor didn't convert.  Maybe I'm wrong but for some reason I thought they had a situation like that and everybody said thay should've kicked a PAT.  That's a tough one no matter how you look at it.

Posted

The question of the night!!! should they have went for two????

Yes, you gotta be in it to win it.

Yea, and stowers should have went for that first down at the end too. A well fought game. Hats off to the PIRATES, much respect.
Guest bucwheat
Posted

wasnt there but listened to it on here..sounded like great game..central started getting there running game cranked up in the second half..Hard fought game..BUT too many penalties and turnovers and you wont be beating anyone

Posted

I say go for two also..they are lucky they scored that last one and I believe they should have went for two also...Just my opinion..

dont even start wuith the luck, i heard it throughout the first 2 games

of course you would say go for 2 cuz the pat was blocked, but would you rather tie the game and go into ot knowing that your team has all the momentum and are playing at home or risk losing on a 2 point conversion

Posted

Didn't that happen several years ago in this game and Vidor didn't convert.  Maybe I'm wrong but for some reason I thought they had a situation like that and everybody said thay should've kicked a PAT.  That's a tough one no matter how you look at it.

Im just thinking that in this district, a win with a statement beats a tie, or a win in OT.  I think Vidor had the momentum and should have went for it.  BUT.... if they wouldn't have made the 2 point conversion, then everyone would be coming out of the woodwork saying they should have went for the tie.

Posted

wasnt there but listened to it on here..sounded like great game..central started getting there running game cranked up in the second half..Hard fought game..BUT too many penalties and turnovers and you wont be beating anyone

ohhh the penalties... dont even start on the nonexisting penalties... 1 of which took away a fumble recovery for us on centrals 30 yard line, and another that took away an onside kick...

Guest bucwheat
Posted

I say go for two also..they are lucky they scored that last one and I believe they should have went for two also...Just my opinion..

dont even start wuith the luck, i heard it throughout the first 2 games

of course you would say go for 2 cuz the pat was blocked, but would you rather tie the game and go into ot knowing that your team has all the momentum and are playing at home or risk losing on a 2 point conversion

I shouldnt have said luck..BUT they didnt complete many passes all night(didnt attempt alot either)BUT they completed a long pass down the sideline..the guy was wide open...In my opinion and thats all it is,  I say go for two..I wouldnt want to bring  a team like Central with alot of speed into Overtime..
Guest bucwheat
Posted

too many penalties.,and too many turnovers..I dont know Pirate if you are agreeing with me or not ,but there sounded to me like too many penalties..

  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined



×
×
  • Create New...