bobcatfan Posted October 29, 2008 Report Share Posted October 29, 2008 I play in the beaumont softball league, and i've enjoyed playing in it the past couple years. There are many things i like about it, but it has its flaws. I've heard many players complain some stuff, and some of it is legit. What happened last night in the playoffs may be the worst i've seen though. In the beaumont upper playoffs last night, there was a big controversy over the bracket, for good reason. The bracket had 4 teams in it, seeds 1 through 4. There are 3 really good teams that could've won it all last night so the 4 seed wasnt really a factor. Instead of doing #1 vs #4 and #2 vs #3, they did #1 vs #2 and #3 vs #4 as the first round matchups. So basically the #3 team had an easy game and got in the championship game while the #1 and #2 teams had to fight it out to get to the championship game. I have a hard time believing this was done on accident and its a shame. These teams show up and play all season to have a good record to get a good seed in the playoffs and they have to mess it up and penalize the top 2 teams. If people want to make a statement to beaumont softball, they should not sign up there next season and maybe beaumont will start doing everything right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LR1969 Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 I was involved for about three years and I found it too unorganized for my taste. Like you, I enjoyed it but a little more organization and concern about issues (like the one you brought up) would make it much smoother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 87CRU79 Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 The Beaumont Softball League is garbage! The lady that runs it is very unorganized, and doesnt do a very good job when it comes to contacting the managers. I played in the Port Arthur league last year, and had a ton of fun. Definitely goin back in the spring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shsu87 Posted November 17, 2008 Report Share Posted November 17, 2008 Beeninnikes, I must correct you on your post. The #1 seed played the #3 team, #2 had a bye because the #4 team forfieted. It was Aces, West Cont, Outsiders, Clown Punchers, then BallBusters(not on playoff bracket) therefore only a four team bracket. So #1 played #3, and #2 was supposed to play #4. Yea #3 basically had an easy game due to a forfiet. The bracket was correct, but the ego's of a few Ump's was what caused all the controversy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobcatfan Posted November 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2008 Beeninnikes, I must correct you on your post. The #1 seed played the #3 team, #2 had a bye because the #4 team forfieted. It was Aces, West Cont, Outsiders, Clown Punchers, then BallBusters(not on playoff bracket) therefore only a four team bracket. So #1 played #3, and #2 was supposed to play #4. Yea #3 basically had an easy game due to a forfiet. The bracket was correct, but the ego's of a few Ump's was what caused all the controversy. I'm not sure who was the #2 and who was the #3 seeds(it doesnt matter), but the bottom line is they shouldve played each other and #1 shouldve played #4 and that didnt happen. I dont think someone forgot how to do a bracket also, i think someone decided how the bracket was gonna be done, regardless of it was right or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigWolf10 Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 Beeninnikes, I must correct you on your post. The #1 seed played the #3 team, #2 had a bye because the #4 team forfieted. It was Aces, West Cont, Outsiders, Clown Punchers, then BallBusters(not on playoff bracket) therefore only a four team bracket. So #1 played #3, and #2 was supposed to play #4. Yea #3 basically had an easy game due to a forfiet. The bracket was correct, but the ego's of a few Ump's was what caused all the controversy. How do you give the #2 a bye over #1 seed? The #1 seed should have been scheduled to play the #4 seed. So, therefore the #1 seed should have had the bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatelvis04 Posted December 6, 2008 Report Share Posted December 6, 2008 I didn't know they had playoffs... shows how much I know... and how good the teams I've been on have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Headed Stepchild Posted December 31, 2008 Report Share Posted December 31, 2008 Where are the Port Arthur League games played ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STiger85 Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Where the playoff brackets made up at the begaining of the season or was it at the end of the season? Playoffs brackets should be made and passed out with the season schedules so the teams know what there playing for. JMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatelvis04 Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 As for the title of this thread, I certainly wouldn't call it corruption. Incompetence, yes. Not corruption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazeek Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 This league used to be great and has gone down hill lately!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speveto Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 so who won the championship. #1, #2. #3 or #4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts