westendfirst Posted December 13, 2008 Report Posted December 13, 2008 lamar 84 tech 79.i see this as a winnable game. Man, you were WAY off!!!
lu cards Posted December 13, 2008 Report Posted December 13, 2008 lamar 84 tech 79.i see this as a winnable game. Man, you were WAY off!!! damn im good.got another one texans 27 titans 17.
westendfirst Posted December 13, 2008 Report Posted December 13, 2008 lamar 84 tech 79.i see this as a winnable game. Man, you were WAY off!!! dang im good.got another one texans 27 titans 17. I hope that one is right as well. As a matter of fact, I see a texans win as well...but I'm saying 24-20.
Guest mffl Posted December 13, 2008 Report Posted December 13, 2008 via Tech forum "Lamar is NOT a good team and I do not want to hear how hard it is to win on the road. We let them shoot 68% in the 2nd 1/2. That is NOT Defense. This is a BIG step back for this team and does not bode well for the upcoming games vs Big 12 teams. Time for Pat Knight to step up! " Oh please... do they know we almost beat them on the their home court last year, and we got knocked out in the first round of the SLC tournament.. maybe Tech's not the good team.
Ruckdad Posted December 13, 2008 Report Posted December 13, 2008 Admittedly, I have not watched a lot of Tech bball this year, but I know that last year's squad did not match up well with teams that ran the floor. This Tech team could still surprise some people this year. Voskuil can fill it up, Singletary is still developing and Rizvic can't play until the second half of the season. That said, I am excited for the big win tonight.
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 15, 2008 Report Posted December 15, 2008 via Tech forum "Lamar is NOT a good team and I do not want to hear how hard it is to win on the road. We let them shoot 68% in the 2nd 1/2. That is NOT Defense. This is a BIG step back for this team and does not bode well for the upcoming games vs Big 12 teams. Time for Pat Knight to step up! " Oh please... do they know we almost beat them on the their home court last year, and we got knocked out in the first round of the SLC tournament.. maybe Tech's not the good team. At this point of the season, Tech isn't a very good team representing their conference.
UNLV Posted December 15, 2008 Report Posted December 15, 2008 via Tech forum "Lamar is NOT a good team and I do not want to hear how hard it is to win on the road. We let them shoot 68% in the 2nd 1/2. That is NOT Defense. This is a BIG step back for this team and does not bode well for the upcoming games vs Big 12 teams. Time for Pat Knight to step up! " Oh please... do they know we almost beat them on the their home court last year, and we got knocked out in the first round of the SLC tournament.. maybe Tech's not the good team. At this point of the season, Tech isn't a very good team representing their conference. If Lamar would have lost, you would say its proof Lamar can't hang with the big boys.
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 15, 2008 Report Posted December 15, 2008 I've never considers Tech a part of the big boys. They never got any credibility until Bob Knight took over the program. It's all in perception as far as Tech goes. They are getting tons of promotion this year from their football program, and Knight's presence
westendfirst Posted December 21, 2008 Report Posted December 21, 2008 via Tech forum "Lamar is NOT a good team and I do not want to hear how hard it is to win on the road. We let them shoot 68% in the 2nd 1/2. That is NOT Defense. This is a BIG step back for this team and does not bode well for the upcoming games vs Big 12 teams. Time for Pat Knight to step up! " Oh please... do they know we almost beat them on the their home court last year, and we got knocked out in the first round of the SLC tournament.. maybe Tech's not the good team. At this point of the season, Tech isn't a very good team representing their conference. If Lamar would have lost, you would say its proof Lamar can't hang with the big boys. UNLV...you are dead on!!!!
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 22, 2008 Report Posted December 22, 2008 Tech IS NOT a part of the big boys. They are in a major conference but one of the weaker teams in the conference. Tech has name recognition but don't get it confused they are one of the big boys, unless you are referring to football.
Ruckdad Posted December 23, 2008 Report Posted December 23, 2008 Blue Dove - How long do you think Tech gives Pat Knight? I don't think he is the answer. It was a nice story to have Bob pass the torch, but for your first head job to be in one of the best basketball conferences in the county is a little overwhelming.
BLUEDOVE3 Posted December 24, 2008 Report Posted December 24, 2008 Blue Dove - How long do you think Tech gives Pat Knight? I don't think he is the answer. It was a nice story to have Bob pass the torch, but for your first head job to be in one of the best basketball conferences in the county is a little overwhelming. I was watching Knight's program today and he was harping on not being in touch with his old employer because he was fired. It made sense. But anyway,it's hard to tell right now because he inherited his dad's team. There are some Tech fans who are not satisfied and there are others who feel he needs to recruit his own players to be competitive. making a guess, I would say 3 years or he's gone.
Recommended Posts