#10gwh Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 i didnt say anything about jarvis... no one stopped jarvis that wasnt nicks job he shut down trey... like literally shut down... lmao... i watch the game ive watched for 4 years... the nets may still be on fire in the montange to bad it didnt really matter... huntsville is where it mattered and you couldnt pull it out there
Lazeek Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 i didnt say anything about jarvis... no one stopped jarvis that wasnt nicks job he shut down trey... like literally shut down... lmao... i watch the game ive watched for 4 years... the nets may still be on fire in the montange to bad it didnt really matter... huntsville is where it mattered and you couldnt pull it out there true
Guest ST4life Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 i didnt say anything about jarvis... no one stopped jarvis that wasnt nicks job he shut down trey... like literally shut down... lmao... i watch the game ive watched for 4 years... the nets may still be on fire in the montange to bad it didnt really matter... huntsville is where it mattered and you couldnt pull it out there true very true......... give me SR and a longer road in the play-offs..... ;D
MWhizzie Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Jarvis can shoot better, play better defense, is faster, cooler cause he is not from silsbee, and smarter than SR face it Jarvis is a better human and athlete than SR
Master T Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 I pick Shannon over any guard in this area. And can someone please mention some other guards in this district cause it getting really annoying hearing just two guards when there are six teams in this district.
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 I pick Shannon over any guard in this area. And can someone please mention some other guards in this district cause it getting really annoying hearing just two guards when there are six teams in this district. There is not anyone as good in the district as SR or JB, so why mention them!!!!!
bobcatfan Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 I pick Shannon over any guard in this area. And can someone please mention some other guards in this district cause it getting really annoying hearing just two guards when there are six teams in this district. There is not anyone as good in the district as SR or JB, so why mention them!!!!! Come on Lazeek, i hope youre joking. I agree with Booker T, there is FOUR pages of this thread and only 2 guards have been talked about. I know Zach Hayes definitely deserves to be in the conversation and i cant believe he hasnt been brought up by someone. The Watson kid from WOS seems to be doing good for them, he always seems to be their high scorer. I've only seen WOS play a couple times though.
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Those other players may be good, but they are not as good as Robinson or Benard........PERIOD!!!!!
Master T Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 I actually agree with Laeek and Beeninikes. There aren't any other guards as good as Robinson and Benard, but there are four threads just talking about them too. There are other that can be mention to make this thread more intersting. WO-S #12 deserve some reconiction and so does Hayes too.
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 It is a message board. People post topics to discuss!!!!! 1 topic, 2 topics, who gives a shoot!!!!! ;D ;D ;D
bobcatfan Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Those other players may be good, but they are not as good as Robinson or Benard........PERIOD!!!!! Lazeek, i dont know how you can say that. I know we all have our biases on this board but i find it hard to believe that you or anyone can say its not even close. An UNBIASED observer, Hoopinsider Cooper, ranked Hayes ahead of Benard. So apparently, he thinks Hayes is either better or close to better for a reason.Â
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Those other players may be good, but they are not as good as Robinson or Benard........PERIOD!!!!! Lazeek, i dont know how you can say that. I know we all have our biases on this board but i find it hard to believe that you or anyone can say its not even close. An UNBIASED observer, Hoopinsider Cooper, ranked Hayes ahead of Benard. So apparently, he thinks Hayes is either better or close to better for a reason. He is being polite!!!!! Hates is no where near the player that Benard or Robinson are. I guess that playing against each other on Tuesday and we will see. I have seen Hayes play and he is a great player, but he is not a game changer as Benard is.
AggiesAreWe Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Those other players may be good, but they are not as good as Robinson or Benard........PERIOD!!!!! Lazeek, i dont know how you can say that. I know we all have our biases on this board but i find it hard to believe that you or anyone can say its not even close. An UNBIASED observer, Hoopinsider Cooper, ranked Hayes ahead of Benard. So apparently, he thinks Hayes is either better or close to better for a reason. He is being polite!!!!! Hates is no where near the player that Benard or Robinson are. I guess that playing against each other on Tuesday and we will see. I have seen Hayes play and he is a great player, but he is not a game changer as Benard is. He's being polite?? ??? Not Chad. ;D
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 C'mon AAW are you telling me that Coop really believes that Hayes is better than Benard?? I know that you do not feel that way!!!!!
AggiesAreWe Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 C'mon AAW are you telling me that Coop really believes that Hayes is better than Benard?? I know that you do not feel that way!!!!! But, I am not Chad. I think Chad takes his list seriously. I don't think he put Hayes where he is listed out of kindness. I would have Benard ahead of him, but not Shannon. ;D
WOS91 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Jarvis can shoot better, play better defense, is faster, cooler cause he is not from silsbee, and smarter than SR face it Jarvis is a better human and athlete than SR Not to mention he is a couple of years older too.
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Of course not!!!! :D I guess Tuesday night we will see who is better than Benard and Hayes. Â Although I already know!!!
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Jarvis can shoot better, play better defense, is faster, cooler cause he is not from silsbee, and smarter than SR face it Jarvis is a better human and athlete than SR Not to mention he is a couple of years older too. Imagine that some smartazz kid from WOS on here talking about a players age in his first post on the board!!!!!
AggiesAreWe Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Jarvis can shoot better, play better defense, is faster, cooler cause he is not from silsbee, and smarter than SR face it Jarvis is a better human and athlete than SR Not to mention he is a couple of years older too. Imagine that some smartazz kid from WOS on here talking about a players age in his first post on the board!!!!! If the 91 represents the year he or she graduated, then that person isn't a kid any longer.
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Kid or adult is irrelevant at this point. JB age has been addressed and was approved by the district. Enough said!!!!!
WOS91 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Kid or adult is irrelevant at this point. JB age has been addressed and was approved by the district. Enough said!!!!! Still doesnt deny the fact that he is 2 years older than everybody playing.
Lazeek Posted January 17, 2009 Report Posted January 17, 2009 Then maybe you should complain to your AD who approved him to play this season. Know the facts and reason before spouting off!!!!!
BLUEDOVE3 Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Kid or adult is irrelevant at this point. JB age has been addressed and was approved by the district. Enough said!!!!! Still doesnt deny the fact that he is 2 years older than everybody playing. I'd like to address this person's statement. In some circles, it is called an "age exception." Age exceptions at the younger levels of basketball will start an argument in a minute because a 9 or 13 month age difference does make a huge difference in skills. But it's common knowledge among basketball gurus that by the 10 or 11th grade, the cream begins to rise to the crop and age is less of a factor comparing basketball skills. Sure the player in question probably has a slight advantage based on maturity. But this is also why some parents hold their kids back, in order to give them a competitive advantage in athletics by the time they reach high school.The person from WOS brings up a valid point. One that should not be dismissed, but at least discuss the pros and cons about the situation. It's like a college freshman or sophmore playing in high school. See, I've never had a problem with age exceptions. I'm a firm believer you get better by playing older players, especially in basketball. So it's really helping the younger players develop. So, the other question is this: Is it helping the player in high school who is 19?
bbwmf Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 "a valid point" that was NOT dismissed, rather handled according to uil rules and therefore, no longer an issue. If you need excuses perhaps look closer to home!!!
Recommended Posts