skipper Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 thats what you call hard work TD-------------thanks
thetragichippy Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 INPEACH them Nice abs skipper. Â Â
td Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 thats what you call hard work TD-------------thanks They don't really go with that mug shot you have been having sporting. I don't know for sure but I'm guessing that wasn't your mug shot nor are those your abs. Just a guess. ;D
skipper Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 :) TD,no my friend the mug shot was taken by connie , of a drunk at the orange police station .but the abs are mine. took 2 years to get those sort of proud of them
AggiesAreWe Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 I have a prediction, the talent and enrollment of LCM is fixing to go WAY up!! They don't bus over there either. I was not intending that statement as a result of the busing, but as a result of the taks issue! I GAURANTEE you can't find five school districts in the entire state that have this requirement! I don't think you can find one. Someone looked into it and unless they are wrong it's unconstitutional. Unconstitutional to set school policy? I'm only passing along information. That was the opinion. We didn't just get the information from a guy off the street either. Some policies are made by people that are in higher positions than the school board. TD,   I've googled all morning and cannot find anywhere that states anything unconstitutional about TAKS testing and UIL competition. I know people think this is a non-issue, but why would the board bring this up if not serious? Are they that ignorant to know it would add insult to injury after the buss ordeal? I wanted to give some clarification about the TAKS testing issue and the Constitution...I'm Aggies wife and was the sponsor of an extracurricular group that had academic restrictions that must be met prior to being accepted in to the group. In our national organization, there were a couple of cases that reached the Supreme Court relating to this subject. In one case, a student had not been selected to be in Honor Society because he had a questionable conduct record throughout high school. The attorneys for the student held the position that the student was academically qualified and therefore had a right to be a part of the group. The court found in favor of the district saying that exclusion from an extra-curricular activity was not a violation of the student's civil rights. In a similar case, a student was dismissed from the organization due to an inability to maintain academic standards held by the national and/or local constitution and bylaws of the organization. The courts again ruled in favor of the district in this case stating that belonging to an extracurricular activity is a choice and had no bearing on the public funded education of the student, and although it was a privilege to hold a part in such activities, it was not an "unalienable (constitutional/God given) right" to be excluded from such an organization, nor was it an entitlement. Summing up, I would think that athletics is also considered an extracurricular activity. It is not a required part of the curriculum. State education code and graduation standards do mandate a certain number of p.e. credits. It's just that some students choose to fulfill that part of their requirement by the choice to par ticpate in an athletic (or band, or cheerleader, or drill team) organization. I cannot speak on the validity of local policies put into effect related to TAKS or any other district or state requirements. I just wanted to comment that the courts had ruled that not being a part or excluded from of an extracurricular activity was not a violation of a student's Constitutional, civil, or unalienable rights or entitlements. I'm no legal expert of course, just a lowly teacher passing on what I hope is helpful.
Gabe Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 the biggest part of the word extracurricular activities is the 'extra'
KDOSullivan Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 the biggest part of the word extracurricular activities is the 'extra' I did a little research and academic concerns always will outweigh any other activities. So, if they want to tie playing ball, or NHS, or drama to passing TAKS, they can. I don't agree with it, but it can be done.
Gabe Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 There are places in the state that have done it. I've heard of it, not sure of any in our area, but it has been done before.
td Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 I guess they can do it then. I think it would be a good way to close the school.
Guest GoStangs Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 I wasn't sure what to think about the whole thing, but in the end, I believe the school board got this one right. Just ask yourself this question: If they didn't have after school transportation and wanted to add it, despite being $2,000,000 in the red, would people be this gung-ho to support adding a $16,000 per annum debt to the defecit? I know I would be against that, and I believe most everyone would think the board would be insane for going that direction. It took me a while to realize this, but the major issue here is not the program itself, it's the pain of change, and people don't like getting something taken away, especially when they've grown accustomed to having it. Unfortunately, in the situation the district is in now, they have to start slashing things out of the budget, and nothing is going to be easy or pleasing to everyone.
KFDM COOP Posted January 21, 2009 Author Report Posted January 21, 2009 Yea but their not going in that Direction.
AggiesAreWe Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 I wasn't sure what to think about the whole thing, but in the end, I believe the school board got this one right. Just ask yourself this question: If they didn't have after school transportation and wanted to add it, despite being $2,000,000 in the red, would people be this gung-ho to support adding a $16,000 per annum debt to the defecit? I know I would be against that, and I believe most everyone would think the board would be insane for going that direction. It took me a while to realize this, but the major issue here is not the program itself, it's the pain of change, and people don't like getting something taken away, especially when they've grown accustomed to having it. Unfortunately, in the situation the district is in now, they have to start slashing things out of the budget, and nothing is going to be easy or pleasing to everyone. Finally, someone from WOS makes a sensible statement regarding this issue. I was really beginning to wonder if there was any realistic folks over there. The fact is, if the school district doesn't start cutting some costs, there will be no school for you Stang football fans to cheer for.
KFDM COOP Posted January 21, 2009 Author Report Posted January 21, 2009 That made no dent (16,000) at all and this will most likely be voted back in anyway.
Guest GoStangs Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 Yea but their not going in that Direction. Well, if you agree that it wouldn't be worth adding the cost in this situation, you must agree it doesn't make much sense for a district in financial turmoil to keep it, either. Â There are some good things that are going to get lost in the shuffle and maybe later, when the district has an extra $2,000,000 in their pocket, they can bring it back, but overall, getting rid of the program is needed right now. Coop, they're going in the right direction here, like it or not. Â They can't keep spending money on things that can be cut back a bit. Â People have argued it's only $16,000 per year they're saving, but that's a good chunk of change, and they are going to have to chip away at the massive defecit. Â I don't think there's a $2,000,000 worthless program that they can cut to get back on track, but there are a lot of little things they can do to save money, and this is one of them.
KFDM COOP Posted January 21, 2009 Author Report Posted January 21, 2009 Right Direction???????????? Do you know everything 3 board members are wanting and trying to do? Man you been gone to long. Check your PM.
Guest GoStangs Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 That made no dent (16,000) at all and this will most likely be voted back in anyway. They made a $16,000 dent, which is pretty good.  When you're in debt like the district is, every penny counts, especially when you consider the cumulative savings.  In 5 years, assuming the cost would not have increased, they would have saved nearly $100,000 from that program alone.  Like I posted earlier, there's no quick and easy fix; you just have to start working away at it. As for the issue being voted back, so be it.  I see all the positives to it, as well.  I do think the board members need to do what's right for now and the future and not what's popular among a handful of people, several of whom don't even have a dog in the fight.
AggiesAreWe Posted January 21, 2009 Report Posted January 21, 2009 Yea but their not going in that Direction. Well, if you agree that it wouldn't be worth adding the cost in this situation, you must agree it doesn't make much sense for a district in financial turmoil to keep it, either. Â There are some good things that are going to get lost in the shuffle and maybe later, when the district has an extra $2,000,000 in their pocket, they can bring it back, but overall, getting rid of the program is needed right now. Coop, they're going in the right direction here, like it or not. Â They can't keep spending money on things that can be cut back a bit. Â People have argued it's only $16,000 per year they're saving, but that's a good chunk of change, and they are going to have to chip away at the massive deficit. Â I don't think there's a $2,000,000 worthless program that they can cut to get back on track, but there are a lot of little things they can do to save money, and this is one of them. GoStangs, you are rapidly becoming one of my favorite WOS fans. Another sensible and well directed post. I totally agree, they have to start somewhere. Like you said, there is no 2 million dollar program that they can cut to get them back in the black. They have to chip away at it. Another thing, the state is expects a school district to cut costs when they are working in a deficit. They are watching. Every school district that I know of would consider this transportation program a luxury, not a necessity. Anyone trying to balance a budget always looks to cut a luxury first.
skipper Posted January 22, 2009 Report Posted January 22, 2009 what the school board at wo-s has started,its going to open the EYES at other schools around dont u think coop ,now everyone might just might jump on the train with the wo school board.this will open alot of schools eyes how to save money
skipper Posted January 22, 2009 Report Posted January 22, 2009 well like it was said yesterday ,wo cant be the only school in trouble yes we will see
td Posted January 22, 2009 Report Posted January 22, 2009 I wasn't sure what to think about the whole thing, but in the end, I believe the school board got this one right. Just ask yourself this question: If they didn't have after school transportation and wanted to add it, despite being $2,000,000 in the red, would people be this gung-ho to support adding a $16,000 per annum debt to the defecit? I know I would be against that, and I believe most everyone would think the board would be insane for going that direction. It took me a while to realize this, but the major issue here is not the program itself, it's the pain of change, and people don't like getting something taken away, especially when they've grown accustomed to having it. Unfortunately, in the situation the district is in now, they have to start slashing things out of the budget, and nothing is going to be easy or pleasing to everyone. Am I the only one that wants to know how we get 2 mill. deficit and then start worrying about how to cut? The whole thing is a mess and yes it is going to be ugly. My problem is how did it get this way. Who wasn't on watch when they were supposed to be. I know it isn't as easy as this but it just seems as though you would see it coming.
KFDM COOP Posted January 22, 2009 Author Report Posted January 22, 2009 I wasn't sure what to think about the whole thing, but in the end, I believe the school board got this one right. Just ask yourself this question: If they didn't have after school transportation and wanted to add it, despite being $2,000,000 in the red, would people be this gung-ho to support adding a $16,000 per annum debt to the defecit? I know I would be against that, and I believe most everyone would think the board would be insane for going that direction. It took me a while to realize this, but the major issue here is not the program itself, it's the pain of change, and people don't like getting something taken away, especially when they've grown accustomed to having it. Unfortunately, in the situation the district is in now, they have to start slashing things out of the budget, and nothing is going to be easy or pleasing to everyone. Am I the only one that wants to know how we get 2 mill. deficit and then start worrying about how to cut? The whole thing is a mess and yes it is going to be ugly. My problem is how did it get this way. Who wasn't on watch when they were supposed to be. I know it isn't as easy as this but it just seems as though you would see it coming. No kidding!!! :
td Posted January 22, 2009 Report Posted January 22, 2009 I wasn't sure what to think about the whole thing, but in the end, I believe the school board got this one right. Just ask yourself this question: If they didn't have after school transportation and wanted to add it, despite being $2,000,000 in the red, would people be this gung-ho to support adding a $16,000 per annum debt to the defecit? I know I would be against that, and I believe most everyone would think the board would be insane for going that direction. It took me a while to realize this, but the major issue here is not the program itself, it's the pain of change, and people don't like getting something taken away, especially when they've grown accustomed to having it. Unfortunately, in the situation the district is in now, they have to start slashing things out of the budget, and nothing is going to be easy or pleasing to everyone. Finally, someone from WOS makes a sensible statement regarding this issue. I was really beginning to wonder if there was any realistic folks over there. The fact is, if the school district doesn't start cutting some costs, there will be no school for you Stang football fans to cheer for. Speaking of realistic statement!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If they aren't watching over the financials and the school closes then we will still have another school to go to. Actually it won't take me that long. If things continue in this direction, there are 4 other schools in Orange county.
Recommended Posts