WO-S 89 Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Voted against Harry Barclay Eric Mitchell Vince Bottley No more after school transportation for the kids.
KDOSullivan Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Voted against Harry Barclay Eric Mitchell Vince Bottley I am confused, does this mean they have done away with after school transportation? ( For extra curricular? )
venom33 Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Voted against Harry Barclay Eric Mitchell Vince Bottley Very confusing.... so do we keep the buses running or not?
skipper Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 is there six board members there at wo-s
Guest wos grad Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 For Heaven's Sake Get rid of this School board!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
KFDM COOP Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Voted against Harry Barclay Eric Mitchell Vince Bottley Very confusing.... so do we keep the buses running or not? No! You surpised?
KDOSullivan Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Voted against Harry Barclay Eric Mitchell Vince Bottley Very confusing.... so do we keep the buses running or not? No! You surpised? How many patrons turned out? What was said in the meeting?
adminbaberuth Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Voted against Harry Barclay Eric Mitchell Vince Bottley Trustees Pete Amy, President Eric Mitchell, Vice-President Ricky Jacobs, Secretary Nancy Byers Harry Barclay Dr. Mary Fontenot Hardin Vincent Bottley
77 Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 How can just 3 votes out of 7 get it voted down?
Gabe Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 How can just 3 votes out of 7 get it voted down? Only 6 showed up. Story soon.
77 Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 it was planed that way easy way out Thats to bad.
skipper Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 the almighty $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ WINS be proud of yourself wo-s school board ,now we cAN SEE WHAT YOU RELLY THINK ABOUT AND ITSÂ NOT THE KIDS
Gabe Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 It was the board member who asked for the issue to be voted on again.
KDOSullivan Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 the almighty $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ WINS be proud of yourself wo-s school board ,now we cAN SEE WHAT YOU RELLY THINK ABOUT AND ITSÂ NOT THE KIDS What a mess in WOS....
KDOSullivan Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 It was the board member who asked for the issue to be voted on again. And they didn't show......What's the scoop OLGabe????? ???
td Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Dr. Hardin made a motion to rescind the November vote until school was out and then try to find a way to either fund it or do something different and Ricky Jacobs seconded it. There was discussion that didn't amount to much and then they voted. This is where it got strange for me. Nancy Byers wasn't there. So we have 5 voting board members and a president who votes only in ties. Now I hope I'm wrong about my knowledge of Robert's Rules of Order. As soon as the vote was called for the president immediately voted to rescind along with Dr. Hardin and Ricky Jacobs. Then of course the other three (Mitchell, Botley and Barclay) voted against rescinding. We had a Superintendant, a board president, a school attorney and a whole school board. There is no way that I was the only one that knew the president doesn't vote. That's what makes me think they knew the outcome before they voted. It looked alot better to finish in a tie than to say it was voted down. Now it just didn't pass to rescind because there wasn't a majority. I really hope I'm wrong about the president voting. Someone there had to know more about how to run a meeting than I do.
td Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 the almighty $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ WINS be proud of yourself wo-s school board ,now we cAN SEE WHAT YOU RELLY THINK ABOUT AND ITSÂ NOT THE KIDS Skipper were you there?
Gabe Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 I don't know the scoop. Just know that is what took place.
Guest wos grad Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 the almighty $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ WINS be proud of yourself wo-s school board ,now we cAN SEE WHAT YOU RELLY THINK ABOUT AND ITSÂ NOT THE KIDS Your right, those 3 sure don't care about the kids!
td Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 It was the board member who asked for the issue to be voted on again. Not real sure where she was tonight. My guess is had she been there the outcome would have been the same. In my opinion. However the president would have had to vote then.
KDOSullivan Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Being a conspiracy nut anyway, will the 3 who voted to keep the buses come up for re-election sooner than the other members?
td Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 Being a conspiracy nut anyway, will the 3 who voted to keep the buses come up for re-election sooner than the other members? I'm not real sure.
Recommended Posts