KFDM COOP Posted January 30, 2009 Report Share Posted January 30, 2009 Central 56 LC-M 35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1979 Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 WAY TO PLAY LADY JAGS. THIS WAS DEFINITELY A CAT FIGHT, EVEN THOUGH THE SCORE DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRUSHCOACH Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 WAY TO PLAY LADY JAGS. THIS WAS DEFINITELY A CAT FIGHT, EVEN THOUGH THE SCORE DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT. I wouldn't call it a cat fight. LCM looked very, very bad. Probably one of the worse games they have played all year. Of course. Central probably had allot to do with them playing bad. Central is definitely the cream of the crop in this district. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slam14 Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 In the first meeting between these two teams Central led at the half by 4 or 5 points and LCM played tough the whole game. This time it was obvious that the Jags had talked about that slow start in game one and exploded and attacked from the opening tip. LCM was on their heels the whole first half. The second half LCM played better, but Central is WAY to good to make up that kind of a deficit. Central is strong and well coached...they could make a pretty good run in the playoffs. I know Ozen is loaded with athletes, but IMO, Central has proven themselves to stand out as absolutely the best team in 20-4A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1979 Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 WAY TO PLAY LADY JAGS. THIS WAS DEFINITELY A CAT FIGHT, EVEN THOUGH THE SCORE DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT. I wouldn't call it a cat fight. LCM looked very, very bad. Probably one of the worse games they have played all year. Of course. Central probably had allot to do with them playing bad. Central is definitely the cream of the crop in this district. BY SAYING "CAT FIGHT", I MEANT THAT THERE WAS ALOT OF HARD FOULS, WHERE SOME WERE CALLED AND SOME WEREN'T. AND ABOUT THE SCORE, I BELEIVE BOTH TEAMS SHOULD'VE SCORED MORE, THAN THE DID. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slam14 Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 WAY TO PLAY LADY JAGS. THIS WAS DEFINITELY A CAT FIGHT, EVEN THOUGH THE SCORE DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT. I wouldn't call it a cat fight. LCM looked very, very bad. Probably one of the worse games they have played all year. Of course. Central probably had allot to do with them playing bad. Central is definitely the cream of the crop in this district. BY SAYING "CAT FIGHT", I MEANT THAT THERE WAS ALOT OF HARD FOULS, WHERE SOME WERE CALLED AND SOME WEREN'T. AND ABOUT THE SCORE, I BELEIVE BOTH TEAMS SHOULD'VE SCORED MORE, THAN THE DID. You are right about the hard fouls throughout this game. I've given up on trying to figure out some officiating crews "style or reasoning". In this game there were several "no calls" on what looked like almost intentional fouls where more than one player was left layed out on the court, and then the next time down the floor they would blow the whistle on a token hand check. No rhyme or reason sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts