Jump to content

Central 56 LC-M 35 Final


Recommended Posts

WAY TO PLAY LADY JAGS. THIS WAS DEFINITELY A CAT FIGHT, EVEN THOUGH THE SCORE DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT.

I wouldn't call it a cat fight. LCM looked very, very bad. Probably one of the worse games they have played all year. Of course. Central probably had allot to do with them playing bad. Central is definitely the cream of the crop in this district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the first meeting between these two teams Central led at the half by 4 or 5 points and LCM played tough the whole game.  This time it was obvious that the Jags had talked about that slow start in game one and exploded and attacked from the opening tip.  LCM was on their heels the whole first half.  The second half LCM played better, but Central is WAY to good to make up that kind of a deficit. 

Central is strong and well coached...they could make a pretty good run in the playoffs.  I know Ozen is loaded with athletes, but IMO, Central has proven themselves to stand out as absolutely the best team in 20-4A. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WAY TO PLAY LADY JAGS. THIS WAS DEFINITELY A CAT FIGHT, EVEN THOUGH THE SCORE DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT.

I wouldn't call it a cat fight. LCM looked very, very bad. Probably one of the worse games they have played all year. Of course. Central probably had allot to do with them playing bad. Central is definitely the cream of the crop in this district.

BY SAYING "CAT FIGHT", I MEANT THAT THERE WAS ALOT OF HARD FOULS, WHERE SOME WERE CALLED AND SOME WEREN'T. AND ABOUT THE SCORE, I BELEIVE BOTH TEAMS SHOULD'VE SCORED MORE, THAN THE DID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WAY TO PLAY LADY JAGS. THIS WAS DEFINITELY A CAT FIGHT, EVEN THOUGH THE SCORE DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT.

I wouldn't call it a cat fight. LCM looked very, very bad. Probably one of the worse games they have played all year. Of course. Central probably had allot to do with them playing bad. Central is definitely the cream of the crop in this district.

BY SAYING "CAT FIGHT", I MEANT THAT THERE WAS ALOT OF HARD FOULS, WHERE SOME WERE CALLED AND SOME WEREN'T. AND ABOUT THE SCORE, I BELEIVE BOTH TEAMS SHOULD'VE SCORED MORE, THAN THE DID.

You are right about the hard fouls throughout this game.  I've given up on trying to figure out some officiating crews "style or reasoning".  In this game there were several "no calls" on what looked like almost intentional fouls where more than one player was left layed out on the court, and then the next time down the floor they would blow the whistle on a token hand check. No rhyme or reason sometimes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,164
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TornadoesFan
    Newest Member
    TornadoesFan
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...