Jump to content

Beaumont Enterprise


Recommended Posts

Guest nostradamus

well....really it's understandable....i mean two teams that have played 8 times now over the last two years with a perfect split of 4-4 and have played the last two years to go to Austin...and who are both undefeated in district....and who have to turn away hundreds of people trying to come to the games ........why would anyone want to cover that type of game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing suprises me about the coverage or "lack of" from the Beaumont "Suprise". You have two state ranked teams, both of which are the last 2 years Regional champ, one being a state champion, and you choose Ned/PNG???? These teams can't hold Silsbee's and HJ's jock strap when it comes to basketball. I can understand the Livingston/Ozen coverage, but you have to cover THE BEST GAME in Southeast Texas!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now don't get me wrong, they should've covered the HJ Silsbee game but there are more subscribers in Ned PNG and that helps them sell papers. Its a business that a lot of people think is slowly dying so anything to sell more papers. And I dunno about Silsbee but Nederland did beat HJ by 16 already this year so how could we not hold HJ's jock? Shouldn't they be holding ours then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nostradamus

when AAW used the term "holding their jock strap" I think he was referring to the game as a whole.....not an individual team.  Believe me, he knows that Nederland beat HJ. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now don't get me wrong, they should've covered the HJ Silsbee game but there are more subscribers in Ned PNG and that helps them sell papers. Its a business that a lot of people think is slowly dying so anything to sell more papers. And I dunno about Silsbee but Nederland did beat HJ by 16 already this year so how could we not hold HJ's jock? Shouldn't they be holding ours then?

There may be more subscribers in ned png area, but more subscribers all over Southeast Texas would have loved to read about Silsbee HJ game on the front page where the most important news is suppose to go. ned png can go in the third or fourth page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when AAW used the term "holding their jock strap" I think he was referring to the game as a whole.....not an individual team.  Believe me, he knows that Nederland beat HJ. 

Thanks Nos. Yes I do know that Ned beat HJ. The use of the term was not only meant for the bigness of the game but also it was intended to mean that Ned and PNG basketball history cannot compare to Silsbee and HJ. I can't remember when Ned and PNG went to the playoffs but we all know about Silsbee and HJ's prowess in the playoffs. I felt the Silsbee/HJ game was way bigger in all aspects compared to Ned/PNG. Therefore, it should have been covered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not the same as having the game covered in the local daily paper, but we run a weekly story on the Silsbee Tigers in The Bee. We don't miss a game ... boys or girls. I don't know if we were able to get in the door to take pictures or not, but we'll have a story for sure. The Enterprise has cut staff to the point of almost killing any possibility of community coverage outside of Beaumont. Why do they cover games in Nederland or Port Neches? Because that's where the money is. When I was a sportswriter for The Enterprise, they used to have a writer who did nothing but cover MidCounty sports. The advertising base is stronger in MidCounty than in another other "suburb" of Beaumont. Why would they cover games for Silsbee or Sour Lake when all those towns offer as far as advertising is small mom and pop stores? WalMart doesn't advertise beyond sales inserts ... It's a monetary thing ... and it's sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not the same as having the game covered in the local daily paper, but we run a weekly story on the Silsbee Tigers in The Bee. We don't miss a game ... boys or girls. I don't know if we were able to get in the door to take pictures or not, but we'll have a story for sure. The Enterprise has cut staff to the point of almost killing any possibility of community coverage outside of Beaumont. Why do they cover games in Nederland or Port Neches? Because that's where the money is. When I was a sportswriter for The Enterprise, they used to have a writer who did nothing but cover MidCounty sports. The advertising base is stronger in MidCounty than in another other "suburb" of Beaumont. Why would they cover games for Silsbee or Sour Lake when all those towns offer as far as advertising is small mom and pop stores? WalMart doesn't advertise beyond sales inserts ... It's a monetary thing ... and it's sad.

Gerry, first let me say I do appreciate what the Silsbee Bee does for Silsbee athletics. You guys cover the Tigers very well and I am grateful for what you and Danny do there at our hometown paper.

I do understand the monetary aspect of it all. I have to deal with it here at this site when doing our broadcasts. But I felt that this game was big enough to be above that, and I think should have been covered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...