Jump to content

25-1A All District


Recommended Posts

MVP #30 felix Jones SP... he turned the sharks team around and was the best player on that team.

Offensive #5 T-cope WH... flat out scored the basketball from everywhere on the floor.

Defensive #12 George Wittaker Spurger...blocked alot of shots and changed even more. He held his own in the paint.

Hope this helps... its not all district but its what i know. :-\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While everyone has a different opinion on what the district MVP is I believe it is meant to be the best player in the district.That award should go to Tyler Copeland.While I don't have any scoring averages in front of me I think the offensive POY should be Daniel Blankenship.In the games I saw he scored both off the dribble and was a good 3-pt shooter as well.Whittacre was good defensive stopper and rebounder so I'll agree with the defensive nod.Jones should definitely be a unanimous first team pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How i see it...

Copeland is a great player but not the MVP.

When do the mvp ever come from the 5th place team out of 6?

He is the best Offensive of player no doubt.

You take Copeland away from west hardin, they are still in 5th place

If you take Jones from Sabine would they have did what they did this year?

Guess me and jones better get ready for aau now...

Great season to every one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While everyone has a different opinion on what the district MVP is I believe it is meant to be the best player in the district.That award should go to Tyler Copeland.While I don't have any scoring averages in front of me I think the offensive POY should be Daniel Blankenship.In the games I saw he scored both off the dribble and was a good 3-pt shooter as well.Whittacre was good defensive stopper and rebounder so I'll agree with the defensive nod.Jones should definitely be a unanimous first team pick.

IMO I think they got it right.The mvp should have been between felix or daniel cant go wrong with either

one.I think whittaker and copeland got what they deserved.(def & off poy).Im not sure but i hear the spurger coach

was the front runner for coach of the year in 25a. congrats to all the young men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't argue with the young guy from Spurger being the coach of the year,he did a great job.I think SP would have been the runner up with or without #30.He was a solid player but they had more depth than the folks behind them in the race.I think the MVP should be the best overall player in the district regardless of where his club finishes.If you would have a mock draft out of the players in this district Copeland would be the first player picked.While AAU clubs may help with individual skills,SP needs to get involved in a good league as a team if they want to improve as a club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't argue with the young guy from Spurger being the coach of the year,he did a great job.I think SP would have been the runner up with or without #30.He was a solid player but they had more depth than the folks behind them in the race.I think the MVP should be the best overall player in the district regardless of where his club finishes.If you would have a mock draft out of the players in this district Copeland would be the first player picked.While AAU clubs may help with individual skills,SP needs to get involved in a good league as a team if they want to improve as a club.

I agree to a point, Out of the 5 or so games i watch copeland play he was awsome on offense but didnt

play much def at all.To me the MVP should play both ends of the court and help his club win. I think it was said on this thread that if you took copeland away from WH they would have still been in 5th place. I allso agree with you

on SP, they need to play together all summer it will make a difference on team play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

felix jones did what he had to make his team better... defense and offense. Copeland was an offensive monster but if he was so good then why did his team get 5th and dont tell me that he did not have anyone around him because he did. HI beat them and they ended up 1-9. Copeland was the best offensive player in the district but not the best overall player.

When does the team record come into play win choseing MVP.???

If SP ended up 5th and WH ended up 2nd who would have got MVP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest THE SCOUTER

MVP #30 felix Jones SP... he turned the sharks team around and was the best player on that team.

Offensive #5 T-cope WH... flat out scored the basketball from everywhere on the floor.

Defensive #12 George Wittaker Spurger...blocked alot of shots and changed even more. He held his own in the paint.

Hope this helps... its not all district but its what i know. :-\

Thats a nice list. Good group of young men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest THE SCOUTER

While everyone has a different opinion on what the district MVP is I believe it is meant to be the best player in the district.That award should go to Tyler Copeland.While I don't have any scoring averages in front of me I think the offensive POY should be Daniel Blankenship.In the games I saw he scored both off the dribble and was a good 3-pt shooter as well.Whittacre was good defensive stopper and rebounder so I'll agree with the defensive nod.Jones should definitely be a unanimous first team pick.

IMO I think they got it right.The mvp should have been between felix or daniel cant go wrong with either

one.I think whittaker and copeland got what they deserved.(def & off poy).Im not sure but i hear the spurger coach

was the front runner for coach of the year in 25a. congrats to all the young men.

Daniel and Felix, that must have been a hard decision. I think it could have went either way. Daniel's three ball is more consistent. Felix is alot quicker IMO. They both play well on the defensive side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest THE SCOUTER

While everyone has a different opinion on what the district MVP is I believe it is meant to be the best player in the district.That award should go to Tyler Copeland.While I don't have any scoring averages in front of me I think the offensive POY should be Daniel Blankenship.In the games I saw he scored both off the dribble and was a good 3-pt shooter as well.Whittacre was good defensive stopper and rebounder so I'll agree with the defensive nod.Jones should definitely be a unanimous first team pick.

IMO I think they got it right.The mvp should have been between felix or daniel cant go wrong with either

one.I think whittaker and copeland got what they deserved.(def & off poy).Im not sure but i hear the spurger coach

was the front runner for coach of the year in 25a. congrats to all the young men.

Congratulations Coach Issac, you definitely deserved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

copeland might not have played great D but i think SP had two guys that played better D than Jones and Copeland other than the big kid from spurger probably was the 2nd best rebounder in the district and wasn't he District MVP last year?

I believe that was his brother.

Last year...

His brother got Offensive POY and copeland got MVP. This must have been another hard choice becuse Philip had a moster season as a Senior and Copeland great offensively couldnt get his team in the playoffs. Wow I wonder how it will turn out next year without Copeland in the mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How i see it...

Copeland is a great player but not the MVP.

When do the mvp ever come from the 5th place team out of 6?

He is the best Offensive of player no doubt.

You take Copeland away from west hardin, they are still in 5th place

If you take Jones from Sabine would they have did what they did this year?

Guess me and jones better get ready for aau now...

Great season to every one

What AAU team do you guys play with during the summer?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest THE SCOUTER

Our team name is Top Flight Port Arthur

We had our 1st game last night and came out on top in the last 2mins

Our leading scorer was Diontae Forney(nederland) and Felix Jones(Sabine Pass)

Can we have stats if you don't mind. I like to hear how these young men are doing outside of school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would urge anyone to get some tape of Copeland in his sophomore season and watch his defense.He didn't have any help this year on the offensive end.I'm sure he was probably instructed not to be to aggressive on "D" because if he gets in foul trouble the Oilers weren't going to score.If your MVP is the player who helped his team finish high in the standings then Jones is a good choice.If it's the best player then Copeland is your man.Did they ever put out a complete list??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...