Jump to content

*Nederland vs. Magnolia Series Updates...Nederland Advances!!!!!*


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dean was outstanding and the defense behind him was the best I've seen all year.  Sonnier, Pitts, Schlett, Bellow, Laird, Cardenas, Vidrine, Dean, and Babino all made great plays.  Just a spectacular all around game.

Big win but need to stay focused to finish it off in one on Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote author=NHS83LU87 link=topic=55643.msg590889#msg590889 date=1242925852]

Dean was outstanding and the defense behind him was the best I've seen all year.  Sonnier, Pitts, Schlett, Bellow, Laird, Cardenas, Vidrine, Dean, and Babino all made great plays.  Just a spectacular all around game.

Big win but need to stay focused to finish it off in one on Saturday.

Ditto that, that was a great team win, our Dogs never gave up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Box Score and score by inning

Nederland Bulldogs at 2009 Magnolia

Score By Innings    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 R H E

Nederland Bulldogs  0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 0

Magnolia Bulldogs  1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 6 3

Nederland Bulldogs 6, Magnolia Bulldogs 2

Nederland Bulldogs                  Magnolia Bulldogs

                    ab r h bi                                  ab r h bi

Jordan Pitts ss  3 1 1 0            Kenny Frelow cf  3 1 1 0

Kirby Bellow 1b  4 1 1 0            Ryno Garza 2b  2 0 0 0

Nick Cardenas cf  3 1 1 1        Brett Thornell ss  3 0 1 0

Trey Terrancia dh  3 0 0 0      Derek Barosh p  3 0 1 1

Cody Laird rf  4 1 2 2 (b1)        Jody Blacklock pr  0 0 0 0

Jude Vidrine lf  2 1 1 0            Jake Downey c  3 0 0 0

Trevin Sonnier 3b  2 1 0 0        Rene Moreda lf  3 0 1 0

Josh Dean p  2 0 0 1              Ryan Welch 1b  3 1 1 0

Stephen Schlett 2b  2 0 0 1    Jarred Greene 3b  3 0 1 1

Anthony Babino c  0 0 0 0        Sam Posas dh  3 0 0 0

                                          Nicholas Johnson rf  0 0 0 0

TEAM TOTALS  25 6 6 5              TEAM TOTALS  26 2 6 2

E: Ryno Garza, Derek Barosh, Jake Downey. DP: Nederland Bulldogs 1. LOB: 2009 MHS

Playoff Team 4, Nederland Bulldogs 5. 2B: Derek Barosh, Kenny Frelow, Jarred Greene,

Ryan Welch. SB: Nick Cardenas(2), Jude Vidrine, Trevin Sonnier. S: Trevin Sonnier,

Stephen Schlett. SF: Josh Dean.

Nederland Bulldogs  IP  H R ER BB SO

Josh Dean W  7.00 6 2 2 1 3

Magnolia Bulldogs         

Derek Barosh L  7.00 6 6 2 3 7

HBP: by Derek Barosh (Jude Vidrine). . . . WP: Josh Dean, Derek Barosh(2). T: 2:00.

A: 0.

Nederland Bulldogs - Top of the 1st:

Jordan Pitts walked, forced out at 2nd.

Kirby Bellow flied out.

Nick Cardenas reached on fielder's choice.

Trey Terrancia struck out swinging.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 1 lob.

Magnolia - Bottom of the 1st:

Kenny Frelow doubled, batted forward to home.

Ryno Garza grounded out.

Brett Thornell grounded out.

Derek Barosh doubled, Jody Blacklock ran for batter, 1 RBI.

Jake Downey grounded out.

1 run, 2 hit, 0 error, 1 lob.

Nederland Bulldogs - Top of the 2nd:

Cody Laird reached on error, picked off.

Jude Vidrine grounded out.

Trevin Sonnier struck out swinging.

0 run, 0 hit, 1 error, 0 lob.

Magnolia - Bottom of the 2nd:

Rene Moreda grounded out.

Ryan Welch struck out swinging.

Jarred Greene struck out swinging.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 0 lob.

Nederland Bulldogs - Top of the 3rd:

Josh Dean grounded out.

Stephen Schlett struck out looking.

Jordan Pitts grounded out.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 0 lob.

Magnolia- Bottom of the 3rd:

Sam Posas grounded out.

Kenny Frelow flied out.

Ryno Garza grounded out.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 0 lob.

Nederland Bulldogs - Top of the 4th:

Kirby Bellow grounded out.

Nick Cardenas struck out swinging.

Trey Terrancia flied out.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 0 lob.

Magnolia - Bottom of the 4th:

Brett Thornell singled, forced out at 2nd.

Catchers Interference

Derek Barosh hit into double play.

Jake Downey flied out foul.

0 run, 1 hit, 0 error, 0 lob.

Nederland Bulldogs - Top of the 5th:

Cody Laird singled, batted forward to 2nd, advanced to 3rd on error, batted forward

to home.

Jude Vidrine reached base on bunt, advanced to 2nd on error, stole 3rd, advanced to

home on error.

Trevin Sonnier reached on error, stole 2nd, advanced to 3rd on wild pitch, batted

forward to home.

Josh Dean sacrifice flied, 1 RBI.

Stephen Schlett sacrificed, 1 RBI.

Jordan Pitts singled, batted forward to 2nd, advanced to 3rd on wild pitch, advanced

to home on error.

Kirby Bellow singled, advanced to 2nd on wild pitch, batted forward to home.

Nick Cardenas singled, stole 2nd, batted forward to home, 1 RBI.

Trey Terrancia walked, batted forward to 3rd.

Cody Laird singled, advanced to 2nd on throw, 2 RBI.

Jude Vidrine hit by pitch.

Trevin Sonnier struck out looking.

6 runs, 6 hits, 2 errors, 3 lob.

Magnolia - Bottom of the 5th:

Rene Moreda singled, forced out at 2nd.

Ryan Welch reached on fielder's choice.

Jarred Greene struck out looking.

Sam Posas grounded out.

0 runs, 1 hits, 0 errors, 1 lob.

Nederland Bulldogs - Top of the 6th:

Josh Dean struck out swinging.

Stephen Schlett lined out.

Jordan Pitts struck out swinging.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 0 lob.

Magnolia - Bottom of the 6th:

Kenny Frelow flied out.

Ryno Garza walked, advanced to 2nd on wild pitch.

Brett Thornell grounded out.

Derek Barosh lined out.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 1 lob.

Nederland Bulldogs - Top of the 7th:

Kirby Bellow lined out.

Nick Cardenas walked, stole 2nd.

Trey Terrancia flied out.

Cody Laird flied out.

0 run, 0 hit, 0 error, 1 lob.

Magnolia - Bottom of the 7th:

Jake Downey grounded out.

Rene Moreda flied out.

Ryan Welch doubled, batted forward to home.

Jarred Greene doubled, 1 RBI.

Sam Posas flied out.

1 run, 2 hit, 0 error, 1 lob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,994
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    janaxad4
    Newest Member
    janaxad4
    Joined



  • Posts

    • If your point was to lie about me, you succeeded. Congratulations. You must feel like a winner, aka Harry Reid.
    • Read it all - good info - thanks
    • Two political opponents pointing to each other and calling each other a liar…..  Is like two roosters fighting  and then pointing to the other and calling him a chicken. 
    • Trump was indicted for his activities on January 6. He appealed the indictment to the District Court (trial court) and the way I read it, they pretty much said he has no immunity, period. So he appealed to the Circuit Court which is not a trial court, but is a constitutional court one step below the US Supreme Court. Both the District Court and the Circuit Court denied even reviewing the case. I believe they simply said that a former president has no such immunity. The US Supreme Court then took up the case on a constitutional basis. Remember at this point there has been no trial so no facts of the case have come out. It has been only appeals on the constitutionality of immunity. The Supreme Court ruling today said that the president has absolute immunity for constitutional authority (conclusive and preclusive).  What that means to me is, if it’s something the Constitution gives him the authority to do, he absolutely cannot have charges filed against him. An easy example that I can think of is the Constitution makes him the commander-in-chief of the military. So if a president authorizes the military to do something such as Reagan authorizing the bombing of Libya in retaliation for terrorist attacks, the president cannot be sued or held to criminal charges because some civilians in Libya got killed. That is his authority as commander-in-chief and protection of the country. The Supreme Court then ruled that the president has presumed official acts immunity. A presumption under law in a case such as this means that it is assumed that the person accused, such as a president, is not guilty. The presumption is that he followed the law. The presumption does allow however for the prosecution to try and prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the presumption does not exist. The person accused does not have to prove anything. The president does not have to prove that he had immunity. The prosecution has to prove that more likely yes than no that he didn’t have immunity. So technically there’s an opening to prosecute but you start out with the presumption that the person accused is not guilty with nothing to prove. As an example, the president has wide authority in many areas including issuing some executive orders. Those are authorities as official acts. If the president was to do something like order the unjustified jailing of a political opponent in an upcoming election and order the opponent held in Gitmo to keep from campaigning, that would not be included under an official act immunity. So it is possible to overcome the presumption of immunity but it will take quite a bit of work.  The president has no immunity whatsoever that is outside of constitutional authority or an official act. As an example of the president gets drunk and manages to sneak past his Secret Service bodyguard. He gets in the car and drives DWI and kills someone. That is not covered under an official act so he could be held accountable for a homicide. So…. For constitutional authorities, the president has absolute immunity. For an official act, he has presumed immunity. Anything outside of a constitutional or official act, such as driving DWI, has no immunity. In this ruling the Supreme Court vacated the indictment because the District Court, and the Circuit Court did not even consider immunity. The Supreme Court did not clear Trump because at this point they have not even heard the evidence. All they issued was a constitutional ruling that the lower courts have to at least consider immunity under the rule that they just established. Therefore the case goes back to the prosecution to bring a case at the trial court level and try to prove that whatever Trump is accused of, it was not an official act. Certainly the DOJ could read this Supreme Court ruling and drop the case, saying that they cannot overcome immunity. I’m not going to hold my breath, waiting for the DOJ to come to that conclusion. Simply disagreeing with a president actions does not disprove immunity. I disagreed with some of the things that Biden did such as ordering vaccines for some workers. Some of that was appealed and the courts threw out some of those mandates, especially under OSHSA. I don’t think Biden could be prosecuted however for issuing an executive order to one of his federal agencies because that is probably covered under an official act immunity. Not liking it does not automatically qualified as a crime. Therefore…. Can the DOJ try to again get an indictment against Trump and try to prove in court that he is not covered by one of the immunities listed? Yes. The Supreme Court  has stated that under their ruling absolute immunity must be taken into consideration for a constitutional act and presumed immunity must be taken into consideration for an official act. Let’s just say that the DOJ pushed this case again and convince the trial court and the appeals court that Trump has no immunity and they get a criminal conviction. At their discretion, the Supreme Court can take this case up again since the trial would have been held and the Supreme Court could see how the lower courts came to their conclusion. The Supreme Court could agree that with the lower courts that there was no immunity and a conviction stands or they could say, y'all weren't paying attention to our ruling and they can throw the whole case out. If you don’t want to read all of that……  To date the ruling is, yes a former president has immunity from what he did in office and by law that must be taken into consideration under the rules that the Supreme Court just set. The rest will play out in the future. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...