Jump to content

Make the Call


Recommended Posts

Guest DickVitale

Go man, get one solid trap, and make sure you are able to rotate on the pass, that will run the clock down, force a bad shot, ball game....If they make a lucky one, the worst that happens is OT....Some would foul here, but up three with only five seconds left, I dont know.....Especially in HS, you dont want a kid to get an intentional foul called on him...But...Its all about feel at that point too....Good scenario, no-look... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nostradamus

I used to be the "play defense" guy.......had it happen too many times in the last couple of seasons......up 3, 5 seconds left....foul immediately.  In HS they can't advance the inbound to half court.......they're gonna have to go the full length.  If you foul they have to have FOUR things go right for them.

1.  Make the first FT

2.  Miss the second FT

3.  Get the offensive rebound

4.  Make the shot to tie

You don't foul......only one thing has to happen and that is make the 3........

no way in the world I would trap anything....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nostradamus

I love going junk defense in this situation if you choose not to foul......pick out the team's best shooters.......go triangle and two.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DickVitale

Trapping makes your opponent waste valuable time, especially up three points...I WAS thinking the other team had the ball at half court though, AND like I said it is ALWAYS about feel...Of course if you dont teach or use trapping defenses, this would not apply..."defensive guy" ::)...I like the idea of going to a junk defense, but if thats not what you have done before, I would stay away from that in that type of situation. I really dont want them on the FT line either....Too many things CAN happen...Up three, I take my chances on my defense doing the job to close out the game. If they hit a lucky, contested three to tie it up, so be it...Win it in OT. But with only five seconds left, a really good trap will disrupt whatever they are trying to do, because 9 times out of 10, the BEST player will get the initial pass in that scenario. Trap, be ready to rotate out of it, they take a bad shot by a 2nd or 3rd option player...game over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DickVitale

I would say no...It depends on your personnel, though, too.....If you have really good, quick man defenders, then I would NOT guard the inbounds and play 5 on 4 with them getting it in the full court...If they get it at half, then I would guard the ball, basket side and have your guy just step in the inbounders path, then guard him in help after it is thrown in to prevent a quick hitter play back to the inbounder.  5 seconds can seem like an eternity, but you have to do the little things to make that clock tick away! Be smart, defend and dont do anything crazy, and you should come out on top in the end... ;)...For some HS kids, though, that can be a TALL order! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nostradamus

I wouldn't trap in the half or the full.......and I have seen a few trapping defenses in my day.....why would you even give the team the numbers advantage......in 5 seconds they can get rid of the ball before the trap comes and one or two more passes to a wide open shooter......no way I trap.....and I believe in trapping......heck it's all we do.

I would foul and make them execute the four things listed above perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DickVitale

Nos, how are you giving up numbers advantage when its YOUR 5 against their 4?  ???  On the inbounds, if they get it to their best guy, you BETTER do something to stop him or make him pick up his dribble....I know!! How about a good TRAP? ::) ::)...THEN rotate..How many passes can they get off after a dribble, pick up, then pass out of the trap...maybe one? Foul for what? stop the clock and let them shoot at you uncontested? ANYTHING could happen then... ::)...I MIGHT foul if they are not in the bonus yet...Otherwise, no way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nostradamus

Did you watch the Magic/Celtics game in Orlando when the Magic trapped Paul Pierce on the pick and roll with 5 seconds left?  What happened.....the best player found the open player and Big Baby Davis drained the jumper for the win.

First of all....if you trap someone how is your 5 on their 4?  If you trap someone you have 2 defenders on 1 of their offensive players which means it is their 4 on your 3.  Second....you insist that they are inbounding it to their best player....if that is the case, my guess is their best player has been trapped before and instead of putting his head down and dribbling like you think he would.......he will have his head up scanning the floor (since he is their best player) and easily find an open man as he sees the trap coming.....and a team can easily make two passes and get a shot off in 5 seconds.  I used to be a proponent of not fouling......but seen it happen too many times.  They would be shooting a pressure free throw that is worth one point....and then have to purposely miss the second one and get the offensive rebound with outside position and then put it back for a tie.......a lot more things have to happen just right for that to work out.

Bobcat,

As for just doing what you do.....that is fine and all but every end of game situation requires different things.  This situation shouldn't be new to either team as any and every coach should spend valuable time working on end of game situations which mean they will have run different defensive and offensive looks in practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I am still on the fence about this. After reading and hearing Nos explain why to foul, he makes great sense. Nos and I had this discussion at the East Chambers tourney when the Orangfield kid hit the three at the buzzer to send their game with Liberty Hill into overtime. Nos was for fouling, Todd and I said not to foul. In that particular instance, Nos was right.

I would be more inclined to foul knowing that the opposing five on the court were not great freethrow shooters. Even if they were, I have seen too many a good high school player feel the pressure at the line to come through with that first freethrow. But, it is a game of percentages. Do you take your chances on a 30% shot, or make them hit one freethrow and then get an offensive rebound. IMO, those percentages are pretty fairly equal, but a little worse for the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DickVitale

Well it does not mean that his philosophy will work everytime, neither does it indicate that mine will...They could BOTH work, they could BOTH fail...Its just a difference in philosophy...I would not foul, he would...we both have valid reasons, and you could win or lose in both instances....Its about a feel when you are coaching...Common sense works too, but I may get in a game next season and decide to foul, even though, I am against it as a strategy today...Thats what makes this game so great.. 8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...