KFDM COOP Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 UIL may let football coaches run 7-on-7, select sports teams The time could be approaching for high school coaches to decide just how much time they want to spend with their athletes. As part of the annual UIL press conference at the Texas High School Coaches Association Coaches’ School, UIL executive director Dr. Charles Breithaupt said the organization is studying the possibility of allowing high school coaches to coach non-school teams. That would mean, for example, a high school football coach could coach a seven-on-seven team of his players, or a girls’ basketball coach could coach a select team of players from her program. Breithaupt, who spoke to the media at the Hilton Austin in connection with the conference that brought together more than 12,000 of the state’s high school coaches, said he believes the coaches fall into three categories on the issue of coaching non-school teams. “I think 40 percent would tell you, ‘Let us coach, we’re already having to be there anyway,’ †Breithaupt said. “Some are saying, ‘Enough is enough.’ There’s another group saying, ‘I’d rather us be coaching them than somebody else.’ †High school coaches are allowed to open school facilities for athletes to work out during the summer, as well as coach athletes for up to an hour per school day during the off-season. But Breithaupt pointed out that high school athletes’ participation on teams not associated with the school has increased to the point that events take place just about every day of the year. If high school coaches vote to approve coaching non-school teams, they could be signing up for a never-ending gig. Breithaupt said there are far more questions than answers at this point. “So how far do you go?,†he said. “Should coaches be allowed to coach 12 months? Where does it pick back up? What does that do to the sport?†Though he spoke specifically about the possibility, Breithaupt didn’t offer a target date for athletic directors to vote on a proposal. “It may be a long study,†he said. “We’re not going to get in a hurry. We’re going to spend some time and get this right.†Breithaupt and UIL athletic director Cliff Odenwald addressed a variety of issues during the press conference, including: * A review of the steps the UIL took in reaction to the outbreak of the swine flu in Texas in May. * The results of steroid testing during the last two years. The UIL has revealed that, of 45,000 athletes tested, there have been 19 positive tests and three unresolved cases. Also, the UIL’s steroid testing budget has been cut from $6 million to $2 million, meaning the organization will test fewer students in the next two years. * The decision made by 1A athletic directors to align in two divisions at the next realignment in February. A referendum item is up for vote by 2A athletic directors and 4A athletic directors are set to “revisit†the possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kelly Football Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Might as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdog Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 The coaches are not required to do the offseason coaching its optional. I don't see the problem there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the sports guy Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Let them coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holdup Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 they gonna coach a real game why not this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HillGuy Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 The real impact of this would not be felt so much in football (7 on 7) as it would be in select sports, such as basketball, volleyball and softball. These are "year round" and having HS coaches get involved would cause a lot of problems and frustration among travel ball coaches, parents and players. Just think about the ramifications...could be some ugly situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PANTHERMAN Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 I suspect this may be as a result of some of the scandals associated with NCAA recruiting. Most of the select team coaches are respectable folks, but not all. I suppose that some of the most notorious incidents have been with select basketball. There have been many situations where the select team coaches, or "handlers", have sold their player to the college coach that offered the most money. I guess the UIL is thinking that by allowing the UIL coaches to coach the teams during the summer and funneling the recruitment of the players through the UIL coaches, the chances of recruiting violations will be lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts