tiger4 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Posted August 22, 2009 West Sabine 3 West Hardin 0 West Sabine's new offense is still sputtering at times but the defense was solid.
Joharr73 Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Posted August 22, 2009 West Sabine 3 West Hardin 0 West Sabine's new offense is still sputtering at times but the defense was solid. I wasn't there, but 2 different people told me that it was 2-0.
tiger4 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Posted August 22, 2009 Call it what you want, but I stood at the fence and watch West Sabine score three times. Once in the 20 play scrimage and one each in the two 8 minute quarters. But at this point in the season it doesn't really matter both teams need alot of work.
Joharr73 Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Posted August 22, 2009 Got ya! ;D It sounds like I was just told about the game situation play. Thanks for the info! What can you tell me about West Hardin? I couldn't make the trip.
tiger4 Posted August 22, 2009 Report Posted August 22, 2009 West Hardin did something on offense well, the quarterback is a big kid and although he had a couple of picks he made some good throws. I dont know if the spread option they were in at times is the best offense for him. But I just got one game to make that assessment. He seems to see the field pretty good. West Sabine had some guys out against Evadale, and they seem to be getting things together a bit more against West Hardin. With that said district 23a should be pretty competitive with West Hardin,Evadale and Hull. West Sabine seem to have the personnel better suited to run the spread option. They rotate quarterbacks and seem to have more speed. But when you institute a new offense it takes time and the defense is usually ahead of the offense.
Joharr73 Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Posted August 22, 2009 Thanks for the info, I live in La Porte and couldn't see driving 3 hours for a half game scrimmage.
Recommended Posts