Jump to content

20-4A Team Statistics.


smitty

Recommended Posts

;D

The Houston Chronicle shows Vidor offense @ 967 yds through 2 games and Lumberton's @ 718 yds.  Didn't look up the other teams but they should be different as well.  Couldn't find the defensive stats.

its correct, u are looking at total in the Houston chronicle, compared to ave in the pa news

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TenaciousK do you really think Vidor will gain 500 yards against anyone in 20-4A?

Vidor has a good team that's not being challanged. As I have said before Vidor has weaknesses (every team does), but they won't find them out unitl District play because none of their pre-district opponents are strong enough to expose them and it may be too late to fix them by then.

I will go out on a limb and say Vidor will have over 400 yards of offense in at least three games in district!  :o
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I HOPE THAT IS A REALLY THICK LIMB YOU ARE SITTING ON! ::)

Tough business to predict your stats before you play any of your tougher games! ???

As good as any other prediction on this board tonight! ::)

I do have to say it is. I have seen some outrageous prediction from alot of people on this site this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats will change tonight!  ;D

            Offense Leaders:

                   AVG:

Vidor             504 yds.

Lumberton      359

PN-G             313

Central          256

Livingston      239

LC-M            193

Nederland      173

Ozen            111

           Defense Leaders:

                  AVG:

Vidor            201 Yds.

Livingston     237

Lumberton    248.5

Central        253.5

PN-G           269

Ozen           317.5

LC-M           350

Nederland     413

Any "suprises" or "that's about normal?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smitty: Are you getting your stats from ipreps?  I noticed in Ipreps that some of the stats are incorrect.  For example; Lumberton RB Asher's rushing yards - season total is incorrect, they do not include last weeks yards. The scoring summary is incorrect.  Lumberton's Mark Purks was listed for a TD and he didn't even dress out.  The PNG/Crosby game stats have or did have errors.  Silsbee's stats in Ipreps for last week were different from Aggies Are We.  The majority of the Iprep stats may be close, but the inaccuracies I know about do create a doubt in my mind about all the stats in Ipreps.  I will say this, the Bmt Enterprise was good about correcting the inaccurate stats I reported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good Luck to 20-4A lets all live up to our billing of being one of the toughest districts in the State. Its great to be in such a competetive district. There are some districts in the State who the same teams go every year. Im glad we have a tough one it really prepares us for the playoffs!  Lets show em tonight our district isnt one to mess with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got these numbers from the PA News.  I think there may be a few yards difference between the local papers.  But overall, I think they all basically reflect the truth.  I will try to stay with the PA News to stay consistant.

Smitty: Are you getting your stats from ipreps?  I noticed in Ipreps that some of the stats are incorrect.  For example; Lumberton RB Asher's rushing yards - season total is incorrect, they do not include last weeks yards. The scoring summary is incorrect.  Lumberton's Mark Purks was listed for a TD and he didn't even dress out.  The PNG/Crosby game stats have or did have errors.  Silsbee's stats in Ipreps for last week were different from Aggies Are We.  The majority of the Iprep stats may be close, but the inaccuracies I know about do create a doubt in my mind about all the stats in Ipreps.  I will say this, the Bmt Enterprise was good about correcting the inaccurate stats I reported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,115
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ashworth32
    Newest Member
    ashworth32
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Hutch and the Cardinals by 40 BC is BACK!!!
    • Regardless of the offense, kids need a reason or purpose to play football. Normally, for most kids, football is something they genuinely enjoy playing, because most players won’t be suiting up on Saturdays. At the end of the day, the most successful teams have kids and coaches that genuinely love the game and get joy and fulfillment playing it.  Vidor’s two current biggest issues are the lack of appeal to play the game and a lack of community support. The offense has been the same for years, and Mathews did a great job of getting the kids and community behind his teams year in and year out. Vidor’s whole identity was being a team you hated to play because you knew you were in for a long physical night. That made the game fun for the kids who played, and they took a lot of pride in it. Currently, I would argue that the toxic attitude of the community towards the offense and Dubois in general is the biggest thorn in the team’s side. The need for instant gratification from fans is what is fueling it all. When the players go home or out in the community and hear: how bad the offense is, how bad the defense is, or how bad the coaching is, the players will begin to lose pride in the program, and the game is no longer fun. This leads to discipline issues and players quitting. Vidor has lost their identity and Dubois and the offensive scheme isn’t the culprit. The Vidor community needs to leave their objections of who they hired at the door and let the man work if they wanna be successful in the future. 
    • We will see i heard they pretty dam good 3 losses but all to great teams
    • Yes. May have been Jimmies. What I’m seeing is a lot more teams going back to more ‘traditional style’ offenses. These things go in cycles, and it’s very difficult for all but mega schools to consistently find QB’s who can really be effective with a true spread type offense year in and year out. I’d venture to guess most schools have an outstanding QB that can win a game almost on their own only every few years if that, and that’s what you need for the ‘high flying’ spreads. So coaches go for the O’s that they can groom the majority of kids to be successful running, and take advantage of the superstar’s skills more within that O when they get them.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...