Jump to content

5 out offense


no-look

Recommended Posts

Most teams that run it don't have a strong post player,that's why there in it to start with.They won't give up a ton of rebounds because they usually don't rebound real well anyway.Warren ran it some a few years back when Hand was down here.They shot the ball pretty well and won quite a few ball games running it.High school ball is all about match ups and personell and if your kids are good shooters it can work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most teams that run it don't have a strong post player,that's why there in it to start with.They won't give up a ton of rebounds because they usually don't rebound real well anyway.Warren ran it some a few years back when Hand was down here.They shot the ball pretty well and won quite a few ball games running it.High school ball is all about match ups and personell and if your kids are good shooters it can work well.

Spurger runs it at times and do a good job with it,but they have a few pretty good shooters.

If they wont come out of the zone they play some 4 out 1 in. With a good G you can break down their

zone and kick it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most teams that run it don't have a strong post player,that's why there in it to start with.They won't give up a ton of rebounds because they usually don't rebound real well anyway.Warren ran it some a few years back when Hand was down here.They shot the ball pretty well and won quite a few ball games running it.High school ball is all about match ups and personell and if your kids are good shooters it can work well.

Spurger runs it at times and do a good job with it,but they have a few pretty good shooters.

If they wont come out of the zone they play some 4 out 1 in. With a good G you can break down their

zone and kick it out.

On your 4 out 1 in where is most of your screening done?(to make room for cutters coming off screens?)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most teams that run it don't have a strong post player,that's why there in it to start with.They won't give up a ton of rebounds because they usually don't rebound real well anyway.Warren ran it some a few years back when Hand was down here.They shot the ball pretty well and won quite a few ball games running it.High school ball is all about match ups and personell and if your kids are good shooters it can work well.

Spurger runs it at times and do a good job with it,but they have a few pretty good shooters.

If they wont come out of the zone they play some 4 out 1 in. With a good G you can break down their

zone and kick it out.

On your 4 out 1 in where is most of your screening done?(to make room for cutters coming off screens?)

From my veiw point most screens are done around the elbow,and some screens on the back side

to help out your post are the back side shooter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nostradamus

Bob Huggins ran a lot of 5 out stuff when he was at Cincinatti.....although he called it the "open post" offense.....just because a team runs 5 out doesn't mean they are not set up to rebound or can't rebound.....5 out is simply the starting point for all the players.....it gives the offense freedom to decide who they want to post up based on matchups.....if 5 out is run effectively someone will post up at some point.....they just don't have a post player that is confined to the post area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DickVitale

My father used to run it in his later years coaching, when he did not have the bigs at Kashmere that he used to have at Madison...Called it 5 wide...It took me a minute to see the benefit of it, because I am such a huge believer in having solid post play, but in some cases it can be very effective if run right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest nostradamus

High school and lower offense....hmmmm.....lets see....the Princeton offense is based out of a 5 out look....and I can name a half dozen teams that have played in the NCAA tournament over the last few years that run versions of 5 out offenses.....

5 out is very effective now because so much of basketball is predicated off the dribble and 5 out helps spread the floor to create spacing and penetration lanes....heck the dribble drive offense is practically 5 out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

High school and lower offense....hmmmm.....lets see....the Princeton offense is based out of a 5 out look....and I can name a half dozen teams that have played in the NCAA tournament over the last few years that run versions of 5 out offenses.....

5 out is very effective now because so much of basketball is predicated off the dribble and 5 out helps spread the floor to create spacing and penetration lanes....heck the dribble drive offense is practically 5 out

The princeton offense was created for the little guy and that is true, but it is most effective with a post presence.  Most college programs that run a similar variation of a five out has somewhat of a post presence and it is more like a four out!!!  The up screen, pick and roll, and the back screen is not to effective without a big... And that is what the princton offense is really all about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is what i prefer to run. I think it is easier to rebound out of it, you don't necessarily have to have great shooters, and it can be ran with true post players. Someone said it is about matchups and when you find that mismatch you post that person up. Nos is correct in all of his comments. I think it is becoming more and more popular. However, it is not easy to teach. It is very similiar to Princeton in that the fundamentals of it consists of backdoor cuts and reading your defender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are doing our best. My best player has chrones disease and it is wearing him out. He needs surgery but can't get it. Probably won't play this season. Right now we are focused on his health and not his basketball. Probably the best kid I have ever coached. Those boys in Htown this year would kill people with the five out. I hope TB is considering it, but he knows best what to run. Not the Woden of old, but they are the kind of kids I like to coach. Come see us play some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...